World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
140
Citations
79893
World Ranking
1684
National Ranking
973

Mark T. Gladwin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark T. Gladwin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 907 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark T. Gladwin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark T. Gladwin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Distinguished Scientist Award, American Heart Association
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Mark T. Gladwin is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. The researcher's work spans a considerable number of publications primarily in the fields of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program (2021, Nature)
  • Research Priorities for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (2020, Circulation)
  • Donor sex, age and ethnicity impact stored red blood cell antioxidant metabolism through mechanisms in part explained by glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase levels and activity (2020, Haematologica)
  • Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Distinctive Clinical Features and Implications for Health Care and Public Responses: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021, Circulation)
  • Home Nitric Oxide Therapy for COVID-19 (2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with this researcher include:

  • Mehdi Nouraie
  • Victor R. Gordeuk
  • Jesús Tejero
  • Anthony W. DeMartino
  • Yingze Zhang

Common venues for publication reflect the breadth of their work and include:

  • Blood
  • Circulation
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • American Journal of Hematology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their primary research areas cover several main fields of study:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these, subfields of study are:

  • Genetics
  • Hematology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

The main topics of their work further specify interests and expertise as:

  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Hemoglobin Structure and Function
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
  • Blood Groups and Transfusion
  • Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology

Mark T. Gladwin has received recognition including the Distinguished Scientist Award from the American Heart Association in 2020 and is a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • The nitrate–nitrite–nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics

    Jon O. Lundberg;Eddie Weitzberg;Mark T. Gladwin

  • Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program.

    Daniel Taliun;Daniel N. Harris;Michael D. Kessler;Jedidiah Carlson;Jedidiah Carlson

  • Nitrite reduction to nitric oxide by deoxyhemoglobin vasodilates the human circulation.

    Kenyatta Cosby;Kristine S Partovi;Jack H Crawford;Rakesh P Patel

  • The clinical sequelae of intravascular hemolysis and extracellular plasma hemoglobin: a novel mechanism of human disease.

    Russell P. Rother;Leonard Bell;Peter Hillmen;Mark T. Gladwin

  • Pulmonary hypertension as a risk factor for death in patients with sickle cell disease

    Mark T. Gladwin;Vandana Sachdev;Maria L. Jison;Yukitaka Shizukuda

  • Sickle Cell Disease

    David C Rees;Thomas N Williams;Thomas N Williams;Mark T Gladwin

  • Right Ventricular Function and Failure Report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Right Heart Failure

    Norbert F. Voelkel;Robert A. Quaife;Leslie A. Leinwand;Robyn J. Barst

  • Cell-free hemoglobin limits nitric oxide bioavailability in sickle-cell disease.

    Christopher D Reiter;Xunde Wang;Jose E Tanus-Santos;Neil Hogg

  • Deconstructing sickle cell disease: Reappraisal of the role of hemolysis in the development of clinical subphenotypes

    Gregory J. Kato;Mark T. Gladwin;Martin H. Steinberg

  • Dysregulated arginine metabolism, hemolysis-associated pulmonary hypertension, and mortality in sickle cell disease.

    Claudia R. Morris;Gregory J. Kato;Mirjana Poljakovic;Xunde Wang

  • Lactate dehydrogenase as a biomarker of hemolysis-associated nitric oxide resistance, priapism, leg ulceration, pulmonary hypertension, and death in patients with sickle cell disease

    Gregory J Kato;Gregory J Kato;Gregory J Kato;Vicki R McGowan;Vicki R McGowan;Vicki R McGowan;Roberto F Machado;Roberto F Machado;Roberto F Machado;Jane A Little;Jane A Little;Jane A Little

  • Cytoprotective effects of nitrite during in vivo ischemia-reperfusion of the heart and liver

    Mark R. Duranski;James J.M. Greer;Andre Dejam;Sathya Jaganmohan

  • Nitrate and nitrite in biology, nutrition and therapeutics

    Jon O Lundberg;Mark T Gladwin;Amrita Ahluwalia;Nigel Benjamin

  • The emerging biology of the nitrite anion

    Mark T Gladwin;Alan N Schechter;Daniel B Kim-Shapiro;Rakesh P Patel

  • Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: Pathogenesis, Management, and Future Directions of Therapy

    Jason J. Rose;Ling Wang;Qinzi Xu;Charles F. McTiernan

  • Intravascular hemolysis and the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease

    Gregory J. Kato;Martin H. Steinberg;Mark T. Gladwin

  • Deoxymyoglobin is a Nitrite Reductase That Generates Nitric Oxide and Regulates Mitochondrial Respiration

    Sruti Shiva;Zhi Huang;Rozalina Grubina;Junhui Sun

  • Nitric oxide scavenging by red blood cell microparticles and cell-free hemoglobin as a mechanism for the red cell storage lesion.

    Chenell Donadee;Nicolaas J.H. Raat;Tamir Kanias;Jesús Tejero

  • Nitrite augments tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion injury via the modulation of mitochondrial electron transfer

    Sruti Shiva;Michael N. Sack;James J. Greer;Mark Duranski

  • Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program

    Daniel Taliun;Daniel N. Harris;Michael D. Kessler;Jedidiah Carlson;Jedidiah Carlson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory J. Kato
Gregory J. Kato CSL Behring
Victor R. Gordeuk
Victor R. Gordeuk University of Illinois at Chicago
Sruti Shiva
Sruti Shiva University of Pittsburgh
Alan N. Schechter
Alan N. Schechter National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Neil Hogg
Neil Hogg Medical College of Wisconsin
Martin H. Steinberg
Martin H. Steinberg Boston University
Janet S. Lee
Janet S. Lee University of Pittsburgh
Allison E. Ashley-Koch
Allison E. Ashley-Koch Duke University
James H. Shelhamer
James H. Shelhamer National Institutes of Health
Robyn J. Barst
Robyn J. Barst Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA has become more flexible thanks to a wide variety of online degree options. For registered nurses aiming to advance their credentials, best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements provide a convenient way to earn a BSN while still working. These programs remove the barrier of in-person clinicals, allowing students to juggle work and study more efficiently.

Aspiring leaders in nursing practice might consider dnp programs online, which are designed for those seeking the highest levels of practice-based education. Many programs are available in accelerated or part-time formats, making it easier to balance with professional responsibilities.

Cost is often a concern for advanced degrees. Fortunately, there are affordable dnp programs that maintain high educational standards while offering budget-friendly tuition rates. These options help reduce the financial burden and open the door to doctoral-level nursing education.

For those seeking an entry point into nursing, lpn fast track program options provide a way to start working in healthcare quickly. These programs are designed to get you into the workforce on an accelerated timeline, often through fully online coursework.

Best Scientists Citing Mark T. Gladwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles