World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
36511
World Ranking
12973
National Ranking
6630

James H. Shelhamer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Shelhamer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 264 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James H. Shelhamer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Shelhamer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

James H. Shelhamer is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a subfield specialization in Surgery. The main topics covered in their work include Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes.

They have contributed to research published in the venue Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.

One recent paper authored includes:

  • Immune Correlates from a Prospective Trial Suggest Leukotriene Signaling and Alternative Macrophage Activation in Clinical Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome, 2021, Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Frequent co-authors in their publications are:

  • Kirsten M. Williams
  • Steven Z. Pavletic
  • Stephanie J. Lee
  • Paul J. Martin
  • Haili Lang

James H. Shelhamer is a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Profound but Reversible Myocardial Depression in Patients with Septic Shock

    Margaret M. Parker;James H. Shelhamer;Stephen L. Bacharach;Michael V. Green

  • Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia: A Comparison Between Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and Patients with Other Immunodeficiencies

    Joseph A. Kovacs;John W. Hiemenz;Abe M. Macher;Diane Stover

  • Inflammation-promoting activity of HMGB1 on human microvascular endothelial cells

    Carmen Fiuza;Michael Bustin;Shefali Talwar;Margaret Tropea

  • A circulating myocardial depressant substance in humans with septic shock. Septic shock patients with a reduced ejection fraction have a circulating factor that depresses in vitro myocardial cell performance.

    J E Parrillo;C Burch;J H Shelhamer;M M Parker

  • CD4 counts as predictors of opportunistic pneumonias in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

    H Masur;F P Ognibene;R Yarchoan;J H Shelhamer

  • Serial cardiovascular variables in survivors and nonsurvivors of human septic shock: heart rate as an early predictor of prognosis.

    Margaret M. Parker;James H. Shelhamer;Charles Natanson;David W. Alling

  • Characterization of a monoclonal antibody (4F2) that binds to human monocytes and to a subset of activated lymphocytes.

    B F Haynes;M E Hemler;D L Mann;G S Eisenbarth

  • Role of circulating nitrite and S-nitrosohemoglobin in the regulation of regional blood flow in humans

    Mark T. Gladwin;James H. Shelhamer;Alan N. Schechter;Margaret E. Pease-Fye

  • Slow-Reacting Substances, Leukotrienes C4 and D4, Increase the Release of Mucus from Human Airways in vitro1,2

    Zvi Marom;J. H. Shelhamer;M. K. Bach;D. R. Morton

  • Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients with Severe Neutropenia

    F. Ognibene;S. Martin;M. Parker;T. Schlesinger

  • SARS-Coronavirus Open Reading Frame-9b Suppresses Innate Immunity by Targeting Mitochondria and the MAVS/TRAF3/TRAF6 Signalosome

    Chong Shan Shi;Hai Yan Qi;Cedric Boularan;Ning Na Huang

  • Diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: improved detection in sputum with use of monoclonal antibodies

    J A Kovacs;V L Ng;H Masur;G Leoung

  • Takayasu's Arteritis and Its Therapy

    James H. Shelhamer;David J. Volkman;Joseph E. Parrillo;Thomas J. Lawley

  • Effects of inhaled nitric oxide on regional blood flow are consistent with intravascular nitric oxidedelivery

    Richard O. Cannon;Alan N. Schechter;Julio A. Panza;Frederick P. Ognibene

  • Depressed left ventricular performance. Response to volume infusion in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

    Frederick P. Ognibene;Margaret M. Parker;Charles Natanson;James H. Shelhamer

  • Relative role of heme nitrosylation and beta-cysteine 93 nitrosation in the transport and metabolism of nitric oxide by hemoglobin in the human circulation.

    Mark T. Gladwin;Frederick P. Ognibene;Lewis K. Pannell;James S. Nichols

  • Effects of Arachidonic Acid, Monohydroxyeicosatetraenoic Acid and Prostaglandins on the Release of Mucous Glycoproteins from Human Airways In Vitro

    Zvi Marom;James H. Shelhamer;Michael Kaliner

  • Cardiorespiratory effects of immunotherapy with interleukin-2.

    R E Lee;M T Lotze;J M Skibber;E Tucker

  • Immunologic and Neuropharmacologic Stimulation of Mucous Glycoprotein Release from Human Airways In Vitro

    James H. Shelhamer;Zvi Marom;Michael Kaliner

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Kaliner
Michael A. Kaliner National Institutes of Health
Joseph E. Parrillo
Joseph E. Parrillo Hackensack University Medical Center
Jens D. Lundgren
Jens D. Lundgren Rigshospitalet
Henry Masur
Henry Masur National Institutes of Health
Tong Wu
Tong Wu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Stewart J. Levine
Stewart J. Levine Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
Mark T. Gladwin
Mark T. Gladwin University of Pittsburgh
Anthony S. Fauci
Anthony S. Fauci Georgetown University
H. Clifford Lane
H. Clifford Lane National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Vee J. Gill
Vee J. Gill National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a medical career but unsure about traditional medical school, online degrees can provide flexible, affordable options. Many U.S. universities now offer respected online nursing pathways for different career stages and goals.

For those seeking an advanced clinical role, the cheapest nurse practitioner programs can help you become a highly skilled provider with less financial burden. If you already have a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, cheapest online accelerated bsn programs offer an efficient route into nursing practice.

Registered Nurses looking to enhance qualifications can consider rn to bsn online programs, which are both convenient and affordable. For those interested in research or academic careers, online phd nursing programs allow advancement while maintaining work commitments.

Exploring these online programs can open diverse doors in healthcare, support career growth, and provide flexible learning tailored to your lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing James H. Shelhamer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles