World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
74
Citations
51418
World Ranking
1440
National Ranking
749

James C. Gee publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Gee sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 415 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

James C. Gee D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Gee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

James C. Gee is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with a focus on several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work encompasses a variety of topics including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Cell Image Analysis Techniques, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, and Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments.

Recent publications by James C. Gee include the following papers:

  • A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain, 2023, Nature
  • A multimodal cell census and atlas of the mammalian primary motor cortex, 2021, Nature
  • The ANTsX ecosystem for quantitative biological and medical imaging, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Cellular anatomy of the mouse primary motor cortex, 2021, Nature
  • A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Co-authors with whom James C. Gee has frequently collaborated include:

  • Jeffrey Duda (30 joint works)
  • Philip A. Cook (27 joint works)
  • Corey T. McMillan (22 joint works)
  • Walter R. Witschey (21 joint works)
  • David J. Irwin (20 joint works)

The most common publication venues for James C. Gee are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 22 publications
  • arXiv (Cornell University), 20 publications
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia, 9 publications
  • Scientific Reports, 5 publications
  • NeuroImage Clinical, 4 publications

Best Publications

  • User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability

    Paul A. Yushkevich;Joseph Piven;Heather Cody Hazlett;Rachel Gimpel Smith

  • N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction

    Nicholas J Tustison;Brian B Avants;Philip A Cook;Yuanjie Zheng

  • Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain.

    Brian B. Avants;Charles L. Epstein;Murray Grossman;James C. Gee

  • A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration.

    Brian B. Avants;Nicholas J. Tustison;Gang Song;Philip A. Cook

  • Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration.

    Arno Klein;Jesper L. R. Andersson;Babak A. Ardekani;Babak A. Ardekani;John Ashburner

  • Spatial transformations of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images

    D.C. Alexander;C. Pierpaoli;P.J. Basser;J.C. Gee

  • Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements.

    Nicholas J. Tustison;Philip A. Cook;Arno Klein;Gang Song

  • The optimal template effect in hippocampus studies of diseased populations

    Brian B. Avants;Paul A. Yushkevich;John Pluta;David Minkoff

  • The Insight ToolKit image registration framework

    Brian B. Avants;Nicholas J. Tustison;Michael Stauffer;Gang Song

  • An Open Source Multivariate Framework for n-Tissue Segmentation with Evaluation on Public Data

    Brian B. Avants;Nicholas J. Tustison;Jue Wu;Philip A. Cook

  • Deformable registration of diffusion tensor MR images with explicit orientation optimization.

    Hui Zhang;Paul A Yushkevich;Daniel C Alexander;James C Gee

  • Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge

    K. Murphy;B. van Ginneken;J. M. Reinhardt;S. Kabus

  • Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation

    Brian Avants;James C. Gee

  • Elastically deforming 3D atlas to match anatomical brain images.

    Jim C. Gee;Martin Reivich;Ruzena Bajcsy

  • Elastically Deforming a Three-Dimensional Atlas to Match Anatomical Brain Images

    James C Gee;Martin Reivich;Ruzena Bajcsy

  • On matching brain volumes

    James C. Gee

  • Neural basis for sentence comprehension: grammatical and short-term memory components.

    Ayanna Cooke;Edgar B. Zurif;Edgar B. Zurif;Christian DeVita;David Alsop

  • Evaluation of volume-based and surface-based brain image registration methods

    Arno Klein;Satrajit S. Ghosh;Brian Avants;B.T.T. Yeo

  • Optimal Symmetric Multimodal Templates and Concatenated Random Forests for Supervised Brain Tumor Segmentation (Simplified) with ANTsR

    Nicholas J. Tustison;K. L. Shrinidhi;Max Wintermark;Christopher R. Durst

  • Deformable registration of diffusion tensor MR images with explicit orientation optimization

    Hui Zhang;Paul A. Yushkevich;James C. Gee

  • A multimodal cell census and atlas of the mammalian primary motor cortex

    Ricky Adkins;Andrew Aldridge;Shona Allen

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian B. Avants
Brian B. Avants University of Virginia
Paul A. Yushkevich
Paul A. Yushkevich University of Pennsylvania
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Hui Zhang
Hui Zhang Johns Hopkins University
Yuanjie Zheng
Yuanjie Zheng Shandong Normal University
Philip A. Cook
Philip A. Cook University of Pennsylvania
Corey T. McMillan
Corey T. McMillan University of Pennsylvania
John A. Detre
John A. Detre University of Pennsylvania
Peachie Moore
Peachie Moore University of Pennsylvania
Daniel C. Alexander
Daniel C. Alexander University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related educational paths and career options. For those interested in technical specialties, an online master’s in electrical engineering degree is ideal, blending advanced engineering with digital innovation.

Not everyone needs or wants a full degree. There are short certificate programs that pay well, which can quickly boost your job prospects. These focused credentials are increasingly popular in fields like IT, cybersecurity, and data analysis.

For busy professionals or those eager to advance rapidly, choosing one of the quickest online masters degree options can accelerate your progress without compromising quality. Many programs offer flexible schedules and condensed timelines.

Still considering what’s most valuable? It’s worthwhile to explore what masters program should i do based on job market demand and personal interests. This ensures your educational investment leads to rewarding and stable career pathways in technology.

Best Scientists Citing James C. Gee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles