World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8313 4437 81 5598
Neuroscience 40 8158 3495 81 5598

Peachie Moore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peachie Moore between 2002 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peachie Moore published across 11 years, from 2002 to 2012, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2004. 10 of the 82 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2004. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications
2002 2012

82 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peachie Moore: publications per year, 2002 to 2012
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 7
2004 17
2005 10
2006 6
2007 16
2008 5
2009 5
2010 4
2011 4
2012 6
Total 82
Download as CSV

Peachie Moore publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peachie Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 81 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 81
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Peachie Moore D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peachie Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Peachie Moore is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research and scholarship within this institution.

The available data does not list any recent papers authored by Peachie Moore, nor does it provide information on frequent co-authors or common publication venues. There are also no recorded book publications associated with this researcher.

No specific main fields or subfields of study have been documented for Peachie Moore. Similarly, there is no information on the main topics covered in their work.

There are no awards or recognitions noted in the records concerning Peachie Moore. The researcher is currently active, as there is no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • What's in a Name: Voxel-Based Morphometric Analyses of MRI and Naming Difficulty in Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia and Corticobasal Degeneration.

    Murray Grossman;Corey McMillan;Peachie Moore;Lijun Ding

  • CSF biomarkers in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with known pathology

    H. Bian;J. C. Van Swieten;S. Leight;L. Massimo

  • Trying to tell a tale Discourse impairments in progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia

    S Ash;P Moore;S Antani;G McCawley

  • Cerebrospinal fluid profile in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

    Murray Grossman;Jennifer Farmer;Susan Leight;Melissa Work

  • Social cognition, executive functioning, and neuroimaging correlates of empathic deficits in frontotemporal dementia.

    Paul J. Eslinger;Peachie Moore;Chivon Anderson;Murray Grossman

  • Neural basis for semantic memory difficulty in Alzheimer’s disease: an fMRI study

    Murray Grossman;Phyllis Koenig;Guila Glosser;Chris DeVita

  • Metacognitive deficits in frontotemporal dementia

    P J Eslinger;K Dennis;P Moore;S Antani

  • Neuroanatomy of Apathy and Disinhibition in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Lauren Massimo;Chivon Powers;Peachie Moore;Luisa Vesely

  • Oops! Resolving social dilemmas in frontotemporal dementia

    Paul J Eslinger;Peachie Moore;Vanessa Troiani;Shweta Antani

  • Non-Fluent Speech in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Sharon Ash;Peachie Moore;Luisa Vesely;Delani Gunawardena

  • Reversal of the concreteness effect for verbs in patients with semantic dementia.

    Hyon-Ah Yi;Peachie Moore;Murray Grossman

  • Patterns of neuropsychological impairment in frontotemporal dementia

    D. J. Libon;S. X. Xie;P. Moore;J. Farmer

  • The neural basis for categorization in semantic memory.

    Murray Grossman;Edward E. Smith;Phyllis Koenig;Guila Glosser

  • Speech errors in progressive non-fluent aphasia.

    Sharon Ash;Corey McMillan;Delani Gunawardena;Brian Avants

  • Apathy in frontotemporal dementia: behavioral and neuroimaging correlates.

    Paul J. Eslinger;Peachie Moore;Shweta Antani;Chivon Anderson

  • Neurocognitive contributions to verbal fluency deficits in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

    D. J. Libon;C. McMillan;D. Gunawardena;C. Powers

  • Sentence comprehension and voxel-based morphometry in progressive nonfluent aphasia, semantic dementia, and nonaphasic frontotemporal dementia

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Vanessa Troiani;James Gee;Peachie Moore

  • Dissociable patterns of brain activity during comprehension of rapid and syntactically complex speech: evidence from fMRI.

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Corey McMillan;Peachie Moore;Murray Grossman

  • The neural basis for novel semantic categorization.

    Phyllis Koenig;Edward E. Smith;Guila Glosser;Chris DeVita

  • Neural basis for generalized quantifier comprehension.

    Corey T. McMillan;Robin Clark;Peachie Moore;Christian Devita

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Corey T. McMillan
Corey T. McMillan University of Pennsylvania
James C. Gee
James C. Gee University of Pennsylvania
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University
Anjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee University of Pennsylvania
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
Guila Glosser
Guila Glosser University of Pennsylvania
H. Branch Coslett
H. Branch Coslett University of Pennsylvania
Edward E. Smith
Edward E. Smith Columbia University
Virginia M.-Y. Lee
Virginia M.-Y. Lee University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities beyond traditional lab work and research. Many students consider advanced degrees in counseling, therapy, and psychology as related career paths where neuroscience knowledge is highly valuable.

For those interested in school settings, the university of the cumberlands school counseling program offers an affordable CACREP-accredited online path toward becoming a school counselor. If you’re looking for an online counseling degree accredited by reputable organizations, there are many flexible options that align neuroscience concepts with practical counseling skills.

Those driven by a passion for family mental health often pursue mft masters programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) available online, which provide a solid foundation in both psychological theory and therapy methods.

As for advancing your credentials, it’s worth understanding how much does a masters in psychology cost and exploring cost-effective programs in psychology, counseling, or therapy that can enhance your career prospects in neuroscience-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peachie Moore

Recently Published Articles