World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
5598
World Ranking
8313
National Ranking
4437

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
5598
World Ranking
8158
National Ranking
3495

Peachie Moore publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peachie Moore sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 81 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peachie Moore D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peachie Moore sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peachie Moore is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research and scholarship within this institution.

The available data does not list any recent papers authored by Peachie Moore, nor does it provide information on frequent co-authors or common publication venues. There are also no recorded book publications associated with this researcher.

No specific main fields or subfields of study have been documented for Peachie Moore. Similarly, there is no information on the main topics covered in their work.

There are no awards or recognitions noted in the records concerning Peachie Moore. The researcher is currently active, as there is no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • What's in a Name: Voxel-Based Morphometric Analyses of MRI and Naming Difficulty in Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia and Corticobasal Degeneration.

    Murray Grossman;Corey McMillan;Peachie Moore;Lijun Ding

  • CSF biomarkers in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with known pathology

    H. Bian;J. C. Van Swieten;S. Leight;L. Massimo

  • Trying to tell a tale Discourse impairments in progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia

    S Ash;P Moore;S Antani;G McCawley

  • Cerebrospinal fluid profile in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

    Murray Grossman;Jennifer Farmer;Susan Leight;Melissa Work

  • Social cognition, executive functioning, and neuroimaging correlates of empathic deficits in frontotemporal dementia.

    Paul J. Eslinger;Peachie Moore;Chivon Anderson;Murray Grossman

  • Neural basis for semantic memory difficulty in Alzheimer’s disease: an fMRI study

    Murray Grossman;Phyllis Koenig;Guila Glosser;Chris DeVita

  • Metacognitive deficits in frontotemporal dementia

    P J Eslinger;K Dennis;P Moore;S Antani

  • Neuroanatomy of Apathy and Disinhibition in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Lauren Massimo;Chivon Powers;Peachie Moore;Luisa Vesely

  • Oops! Resolving social dilemmas in frontotemporal dementia

    Paul J Eslinger;Peachie Moore;Vanessa Troiani;Shweta Antani

  • Non-Fluent Speech in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Sharon Ash;Peachie Moore;Luisa Vesely;Delani Gunawardena

  • Reversal of the concreteness effect for verbs in patients with semantic dementia.

    Hyon-Ah Yi;Peachie Moore;Murray Grossman

  • Patterns of neuropsychological impairment in frontotemporal dementia

    D. J. Libon;S. X. Xie;P. Moore;J. Farmer

  • The neural basis for categorization in semantic memory.

    Murray Grossman;Edward E. Smith;Phyllis Koenig;Guila Glosser

  • Speech errors in progressive non-fluent aphasia.

    Sharon Ash;Corey McMillan;Delani Gunawardena;Brian Avants

  • Apathy in frontotemporal dementia: behavioral and neuroimaging correlates.

    Paul J. Eslinger;Peachie Moore;Shweta Antani;Chivon Anderson

  • Neurocognitive contributions to verbal fluency deficits in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

    D. J. Libon;C. McMillan;D. Gunawardena;C. Powers

  • Sentence comprehension and voxel-based morphometry in progressive nonfluent aphasia, semantic dementia, and nonaphasic frontotemporal dementia

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Vanessa Troiani;James Gee;Peachie Moore

  • Dissociable patterns of brain activity during comprehension of rapid and syntactically complex speech: evidence from fMRI.

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Corey McMillan;Peachie Moore;Murray Grossman

  • The neural basis for novel semantic categorization.

    Phyllis Koenig;Edward E. Smith;Guila Glosser;Chris DeVita

  • Neural basis for generalized quantifier comprehension.

    Corey T. McMillan;Robin Clark;Peachie Moore;Christian Devita

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Corey T. McMillan
Corey T. McMillan University of Pennsylvania
James C. Gee
James C. Gee University of Pennsylvania
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University
Anjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee University of Pennsylvania
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
Guila Glosser
Guila Glosser University of Pennsylvania
H. Branch Coslett
H. Branch Coslett University of Pennsylvania
Edward E. Smith
Edward E. Smith Columbia University
Virginia M.-Y. Lee
Virginia M.-Y. Lee University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities beyond traditional lab work and research. Many students consider advanced degrees in counseling, therapy, and psychology as related career paths where neuroscience knowledge is highly valuable.

For those interested in school settings, the university of the cumberlands school counseling program offers an affordable CACREP-accredited online path toward becoming a school counselor. If you’re looking for an online counseling degree accredited by reputable organizations, there are many flexible options that align neuroscience concepts with practical counseling skills.

Those driven by a passion for family mental health often pursue mft masters programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) available online, which provide a solid foundation in both psychological theory and therapy methods.

As for advancing your credentials, it’s worth understanding how much does a masters in psychology cost and exploring cost-effective programs in psychology, counseling, or therapy that can enhance your career prospects in neuroscience-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peachie Moore

Recently Published Articles