World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
84
Citations
21964
World Ranking
1238
National Ranking
751

Neuroscience

D-Index
85
Citations
22229
World Ranking
1354
National Ranking
681

H. Branch Coslett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Branch Coslett sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 233 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

H. Branch Coslett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Branch Coslett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

H. Branch Coslett is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States and conducts research primarily within the field of neuroscience. Their scholarly output encompasses a range of topics centered on cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and imaging techniques, with a focus on understanding brain function and motor control.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Neuroscience

The subfields of study covered by Coslett's research feature:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Several specific topics emerge repeatedly in Coslett's publications:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Olufunsho Faseyitan
  • Roy H. Hamilton
  • Jared Medina
  • Yuqi Liu
  • Elizabeth J. Halfen

Coslett's publications have appeared in several notable journals and venues, such as:

  • Cortex
  • NeuroImage
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface

A selection of recent papers authored or co-authored by H. Branch Coslett includes:

  • Can they touch? A novel mental motor imagery task for the assessment of back pain (2024), published in Frontiers in Pain Research
  • Efficacy of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in the Enhancement of Working Memory Performance in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Meta-Analysis (2023), published in Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • Glutamate-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (GluCEST) Detects Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Motor Cortex (2022), published in NeuroImage
  • Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection (2021), published in Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • Ever-ready for action: Spatial effects on motor system excitability (2020), published in Cortex

Best Publications

  • The image of time: a voxel-wise meta-analysis.

    Martin Wiener;Peter Turkeltaub;H.B. Coslett

  • Evidence for Multiple, Distinct Representations of the Human Body

    John Schwoebel;H. Branch Coslett

  • Frontotemporal dementia: clinicopathological correlations.

    Mark S. Forman;Jennifer Farmer;Julene K. Johnson;Christopher M. Clark

  • Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia

    Sarah D. Breedin;Eleanor M. Saffran;H. Branch Coslett

  • Directional hypokinesia Prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect

    K. M. Heilman;D. Bowers;H. B. Coslett;H. Whelan

  • Anterior temporal involvement in semantic word retrieval: voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping evidence from aphasia

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Daniel Y. Kimberg;Grant M. Walker;Olufunsho Faseyitan

  • Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area

    Tatiana T. Schnur;Myrna F. Schwartz;Daniel Y. Kimberg;Elizabeth Hirshorn

  • Comprehension of affective and nonaffective prosody

    K. M. Heilman;D. Bowers;L. Speedie;H. B. Coslett

  • Pain and the body schema: evidence for peripheral effects on mental representations of movement.

    John Schwoebel;Robert Friedman;Nanci Duda;H. Branch Coslett

  • Long-term corticosteroid treatment of myasthenia gravis: Report of 116 patients

    Robert M. Pascuzzi;H. Branch Coslett;T. R. Johns

  • Processing of faces by patients with unilateral hemisphere lesions. I. Dissociation between judgments of facial affect and facial identity.

    D Bowers;R M Bauer;H B Coslett;K M Heilman

  • Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Consuelo B. Boronat;Laurel J. Buxbaum;H. Branch Coslett;Kathy Tang

  • Power in Voxel-based Lesion-Symptom Mapping

    Daniel Y. Kimberg;H. Branch Coslett;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Daniel Y. Kimberg;Grant M. Walker;Adelyn Brecher

  • Neural organization of spoken language revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.

    Daniel Mirman;Qi Chen;Yongsheng Zhang;Ze Wang;Ze Wang

  • Multivariate lesion-symptom mapping using support vector regression.

    Yongsheng Zhang;Daniel Y. Kimberg;H. Branch Coslett;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Effects of methylphenidate on attention deficits after traumatic brain injury: a multidimensional, randomized, controlled trial.

    John Whyte;Tessa Hart;Monica Vaccaro;Patricia Grieb-Neff

  • Localization of sublexical speech perception components.

    Peter E Turkeltaub;H. Branch Coslett

  • Critical brain regions for action recognition: lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke

    Solène Kalénine;Laurel J. Buxbaum;Harry Branch Coslett

  • Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration.

    Laurel J. Buxbaum;Laurel J. Buxbaum;Kathleen Kyle;Murray Grossman;H. Branch Coslett;H. Branch Coslett

  • Specialised structural descriptions for human body parts: Evidence from autotopagnosia

    Laurel J. Buxbaum;H. Branch Coslett

Frequent Co-Authors

Roy H. Hamilton
Roy H. Hamilton University of Pennsylvania
Laurel J. Buxbaum
Laurel J. Buxbaum Thomas Jefferson University
Myrna F. Schwartz
Myrna F. Schwartz Temple University
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Anjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee University of Pennsylvania
Eleanor M. Saffran
Eleanor M. Saffran Temple University
Kenneth M. Heilman
Kenneth M. Heilman University of Florida
John Whyte
John Whyte Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience
Peter E. Turkeltaub
Peter E. Turkeltaub Georgetown University
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career options, particularly in the field of social work. Each state in the USA can have unique education requirements for social workers, which is an important consideration if you're planning your academic path.

For example, the social worker education requirements in Michigan emphasize earning either a Bachelor’s or Master’s in Social Work depending on the type of licensure pursued. In contrast, the social worker education requirements in Minnesota set specific degree and supervised experience requirements for various licensing levels.

Similarly, you will find that Mississippi education requirements for social workers and Missouri education requirements for social workers outline different steps and degree expectations for entry into this profession. Depending on your interests, online programs in social work or psychology can be tailored to meet state-specific criteria, helping you progress toward specialized roles in clinical, school, or community settings.

Best Scientists Citing H. Branch Coslett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles