World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eleanor M. Saffran

Eleanor M. Saffran

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
13678
World Ranking
4748
National Ranking
2634

Eleanor M. Saffran publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor M. Saffran sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eleanor M. Saffran D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor M. Saffran sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eleanor M. Saffran was affiliated with Temple University in the United States. Their academic career focused on various areas within their field, contributing to research and scholarship through different channels.

Although no specific recent papers or frequent co-authors are documented, their work was part of the broader academic community associated with Temple University.

No particular publication venues or book publishers have been recorded in association with Eleanor M. Saffran, nor are there details of awards received during their career.

The available data does not specify main or subfields of study, nor does it list particular topics of research pursued.

The absence of detailed information on publications and collaborations limits a more comprehensive overview, but the noted affiliation confirms their role within academic research in the United States.

Best Publications

  • Lexical Access in Aphasic and Nonaphasic Speakers

    Gary S. Dell;Myrna F. Schwartz;Nadine Martin;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics

    Marcia C. Linebarger;Myrna F. Schwartz;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedure and data.

    Eleanor M. Saffran;Rita Sloan Berndt;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Dissociations of language function in dementia: a case study.

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Oscar S.M. Marin;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • The word order problem in agrammatism ☆: I. Comprehension

    Myrna F Schwartz;Eleanor M Saffran;Oscar S.M Marin

  • Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia

    Sarah D. Breedin;Eleanor M. Saffran;H. Branch Coslett

  • Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects

    Laurel J Buxbaum;Eleanor M Saffran

  • Language and Auditory-verbal Short-term Memory Impairments: Evidence for Common Underlying Processes

    Nadine Martin;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • Immediate memory for word lists and sentences in a patient with deficient auditory short-term memory.

    Eleanor M. Saffran;Oscar S.M. Marin

  • Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Consuelo B. Boronat;Laurel J. Buxbaum;H. Branch Coslett;Kathy Tang

  • A computational account of deep dysphasia: evidence from a single case study.

    Nadine Martin;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • The word order problem in agrammatism. II. Production.

    Eleanor M Saffran;Myrna F Schwartz;Oscar S.M Marin

  • Quantitative Analysis of Aphasic Sentence Production: Further Development and New Data

    Elizabeth Rochon;Eleanor M. Saffran;Rita Sloan Berndt;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Semantic Factors in Verb Retrieval: An Effect of Complexity

    Sarah D. Breedin;Eleanor M. Saffran;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification: Evidence from a letter-by-letter Reader

    Tim Shallice;Eleanor Saffran

  • Origins of paraphasias in deep dysphasia : testing the consequences of a decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval

    Nadine Martin;Gary S. Dell;Eleanor M. Saffran;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Mapping therapy: A treatment programme for agrammatism

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Eleanor M. Saffran;Ruth B. Fink;Jessica L. Myers

  • Reading without phonology: evidence from aphasia.

    Eleanor M. Saffran;Oscar S. M. Marin

  • Recovery in deep dysphasia: Evidence for a relation between auditory–verbal STM capacity and lexical errors in repetition

    Nadine Martin;Eleanor M. Saffran;Gary S. Dell

  • Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia

    M. F. Schwartz;M. C. Linebarger;E. M. Saffran;D. S. Pate

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadine Martin
Nadine Martin Temple University
Myrna F. Schwartz
Myrna F. Schwartz Temple University
H. Branch Coslett
H. Branch Coslett University of Pennsylvania
Gary S. Dell
Gary S. Dell University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Laurel J. Buxbaum
Laurel J. Buxbaum Thomas Jefferson University
Rita Sloan Berndt
Rita Sloan Berndt University of Maryland, Baltimore
Tim Shallice
Tim Shallice University College London
Suparna Rajaram
Suparna Rajaram Stony Brook University
Elizabeth Rochon
Elizabeth Rochon University of Toronto
Robert W. Weisberg
Robert W. Weisberg Temple University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding careers. For students interested in becoming licensed therapists, Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) is a popular path. MFTs help individuals, couples, and families manage personal and relationship issues, making the profession both impactful and fulfilling.

Career pathways to licensure can vary depending on city and state requirements. For example, you can explore how to become a marriage and family therapist in Laredo or learn how to become an mft in Las Vegas. Each location may have different criteria, including supervised hours, state-specific exams, and graduate training.

Many students also want to know how to become a marriage and family therapist in Lexington or about the Lincoln mft education requirements. Online programs make it easier to meet these requirements while managing other commitments. Carefully research state regulations and choose accredited online degrees to ensure a smooth pathway to your desired career.

Best Scientists Citing Eleanor M. Saffran

Recently Published Articles