World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
8500
World Ranking
7812
National Ranking
4198

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
8504
World Ranking
7783
National Ranking
3342

Nadine Martin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Martin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nadine Martin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Martin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadine Martin is affiliated with Temple University in the United States. The research focus spans neuroscience, psychology, and medicine, with particular attention to cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, psychiatry and mental health, neurology, and rehabilitation.

The primary areas of study include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Martin's recent publications demonstrate a focus on aphasia treatment and language function rehabilitation. Selected works include:

  • "Demystifying the Complexity of Aphasia Treatment: Application of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System," 2021, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "Evaluating Cognitive-Linguistic Approaches to Interventions for Aphasia Within the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System," 2021, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "Language learning in aphasia: A narrative review and critical analysis of the literature with implications for language therapy," 2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Identifying Verbal Short-Term Memory and Working Memory Impairments in Individuals With Latent Aphasia," 2020, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • "Treatment of verbal short-term memory abilities to improve language function in aphasia: A case series treatment study," 2020, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Frequent coauthors involved in collaborative research include:

  • Matti Laine
  • Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
  • Jessica Obermeyer
  • Claudia Peñaloza
  • Wendy Greenspan

Martin's work has been published multiple times in venues such as:

  • Aphasiology
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Brain Sciences

Best Publications

  • Lexical Access in Aphasic and Nonaphasic Speakers

    Gary S. Dell;Myrna F. Schwartz;Nadine Martin;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • The Philadelphia Naming Test: Scoring and Rationale

    April Roach;Myrna F. Schwartz;Nadine Martin;Rita S. Grewal

  • Language and Auditory-verbal Short-term Memory Impairments: Evidence for Common Underlying Processes

    Nadine Martin;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • A Case-Series Test of the Interactive Two-Step Model of Lexical Access: Evidence from Picture Naming.

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Gary S. Dell;Nadine Martin;Susanne Gahl

  • A computational account of deep dysphasia: evidence from a single case study.

    Nadine Martin;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • Origins of paraphasias in deep dysphasia : testing the consequences of a decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval

    Nadine Martin;Gary S. Dell;Eleanor M. Saffran;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Mapping therapy: A treatment programme for agrammatism

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Eleanor M. Saffran;Ruth B. Fink;Jessica L. Myers

  • Recovery in deep dysphasia: Evidence for a relation between auditory–verbal STM capacity and lexical errors in repetition

    Nadine Martin;Eleanor M. Saffran;Gary S. Dell

  • Translational Research in Aphasia: From Neuroscience to Neurorehabilitation

    Anastasia M. Raymer;Pelagie Beeson;Audrey Holland;Diane Kendall

  • A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Predicting word repetition from picture naming

    Gary S. Dell;Nadine Martin;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Adult Brain Plasticity Elicited by Anomia Treatment

    Katri Cornelissen;Matti Laine;Antti Tarkiainen;Tiina Järvensivu

  • Anomia: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects

    Matti Laine;Nadine Martin

  • Variables influencing the occurrence of naming errors: Implications for models of lexical retrieval☆

    Nadine Martin;Robert W Weisberg;Eleanor M Saffran

  • EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORD PROCESSING AND VERBAL SHORT-TERM MEMORY: EVIDENCE FROM ASSOCIATIONS AND DISSOCIATIONS

    Nadine Martin;Prahlad Gupta

  • Measurements of auditory-verbal STM span in aphasia: effects of item, task, and lexical impairment.

    Nadine Martin;Jennifer Ayala

  • Phonological Facilitation of Semantic Errors in Normal and Aphasic Speakers

    Nadine Martin

  • Learning new names for new objects: cortical effects as measured by magnetoencephalography.

    Katri Cornelissen;Matti Laine;Kati Renvall;Timo Saarinen

  • The Origins of Formal Paraphasias in Aphasics' Picture Naming

    Deborah A. Gagnon;Myrna F. Schwartz;Nadine Martin;Gary S. Dell

  • Space aliens and nonwords: stimuli for investigating the learning of novel word-meaning pairs.

    Prahlad Gupta;John Lipinski;Brandon Abbs;Po-Han Lin

  • Effects of Structural Priming on Sentence Production in Aphasics

    Eleanor M. Saffran;Nadine Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Matti Laine
Matti Laine Åbo Akademi University
Eleanor M. Saffran
Eleanor M. Saffran Temple University
Myrna F. Schwartz
Myrna F. Schwartz Temple University
Gary S. Dell
Gary S. Dell University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Riitta Salmelin
Riitta Salmelin Aalto University
Holly P. Branigan
Holly P. Branigan University of Edinburgh
Cynthia K. Thompson
Cynthia K. Thompson Northwestern University
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Juha O. Rinne
Juha O. Rinne Turku University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your neuroscience education can open pathways to diverse careers in counseling, therapy, and psychology. For students seeking flexibility, accredited online programs make advanced study more accessible and affordable than ever before.

Those interested in clinical counseling may consider exploring cacrep accredited programs, which meet rigorous standards and are often required for professional licensure. Aspiring counselors can also pursue an online master's in counseling, providing comprehensive training in mental health care and client support.

If your interests align with family dynamics and relationships, online mft programs accredited offer pathways into marriage and family therapy. These programs emphasize systemic approaches for addressing individual and family challenges.

For a broader foundation, an affordable online masters in psychology provides versatile skills valued across healthcare, research, education, and business sectors. Whichever path you choose, online programs can help you build expertise and prepare for meaningful roles in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Nadine Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles