World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Myrna F. Schwartz

Myrna F. Schwartz

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
18508
World Ranking
2939
National Ranking
1689

Myrna F. Schwartz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myrna F. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Myrna F. Schwartz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myrna F. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Myrna F. Schwartz is affiliated with Temple University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology.

Schwartz has contributed to topics including:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Memory Processes and Influences

The scientist's recent scholarly output includes a paper titled Learning from errors: Exploration of the monitoring learning effect, published in 2022 in the journal Cognition. This work examines learning mechanisms related to error monitoring.

Schwartz frequently collaborates with several researchers, such as:

  • Erica L. Middleton
  • Gary S. Dell
  • Adelyn Brecher

Publication venues where Schwartz's work appears include:

  • Cognition

The primary fields of study for Schwartz's research activity are Neuroscience and Psychology, with 2 and 1 publications respectively. Their subfields reflect this focus in Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Best Publications

  • Lexical Access in Aphasic and Nonaphasic Speakers

    Gary S. Dell;Myrna F. Schwartz;Nadine Martin;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics

    Marcia C. Linebarger;Myrna F. Schwartz;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedure and data.

    Eleanor M. Saffran;Rita Sloan Berndt;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Dissociations of language function in dementia: a case study.

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Oscar S.M. Marin;Eleanor M. Saffran

  • The word order problem in agrammatism ☆: I. Comprehension

    Myrna F Schwartz;Eleanor M Saffran;Oscar S.M Marin

  • The Dark Side of Incremental Learning: A Model of Cumulative Semantic Interference during Lexical Access in Speech Production.

    Gary M. Oppenheim;Gary S. Dell;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Anterior temporal involvement in semantic word retrieval: voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping evidence from aphasia

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Daniel Y. Kimberg;Grant M. Walker;Olufunsho Faseyitan

  • Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area

    Tatiana T. Schnur;Myrna F. Schwartz;Daniel Y. Kimberg;Elizabeth Hirshorn

  • A Case-Series Test of the Interactive Two-Step Model of Lexical Access: Evidence from Picture Naming.

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Gary S. Dell;Nadine Martin;Susanne Gahl

  • The Quantitative Description of Action Disorganisation after Brain Damage: A Case Study

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Edward S. Reed;Michael Montgomery;Carolyn Palmer

  • Power in Voxel-based Lesion-Symptom Mapping

    Daniel Y. Kimberg;H. Branch Coslett;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Daniel Y. Kimberg;Grant M. Walker;Adelyn Brecher

  • Neural organization of spoken language revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.

    Daniel Mirman;Qi Chen;Yongsheng Zhang;Ze Wang;Ze Wang

  • Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production

    Nazbanou Nozari;Gary S. Dell;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Multivariate lesion-symptom mapping using support vector regression.

    Yongsheng Zhang;Daniel Y. Kimberg;H. Branch Coslett;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • The Naturalistic Action Test: A standardised assessment for everyday action impairment

    Myrna F. Schwartz;Mary Segal;Tracy Veramonti;Mary Ferraro

  • Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors.

    Audrey K. Kittredge;Gary S. Dell;Jay Verkuilen;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • The word order problem in agrammatism. II. Production.

    Eleanor M Saffran;Myrna F Schwartz;Oscar S.M Marin

  • Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.

    Laurel J Buxbaum;Angela Sirigu;Myrna F Schwartz;Roberta Klatzky

  • Quantitative Analysis of Aphasic Sentence Production: Further Development and New Data

    Elizabeth Rochon;Eleanor M. Saffran;Rita Sloan Berndt;Myrna F. Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary S. Dell
Gary S. Dell University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
H. Branch Coslett
H. Branch Coslett University of Pennsylvania
Eleanor M. Saffran
Eleanor M. Saffran Temple University
Nadine Martin
Nadine Martin Temple University
Laurel J. Buxbaum
Laurel J. Buxbaum Thomas Jefferson University
Daniel Mirman
Daniel Mirman University of Edinburgh
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill University of Pennsylvania
Tania Giovannetti
Tania Giovannetti Temple University
Tessa Hart
Tessa Hart Yeshiva University
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA can open the door to a variety of dynamic careers. Many students start with a foundational degree before exploring advanced specializations or transitioning into related fields. Today’s online psychology programs offer flexible pathways, enabling learners to balance their studies with professional or personal commitments.

Prospective students should carefully research their options to find the programs that best match their interests and career goals. For example, those interested in urban environments may consider the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Charlotte or explore popular psychology programs in Washington, D.C. for a capital-city experience. Regional choices like the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Delaware or the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Fort Worth also provide excellent pathways, each with unique local opportunities for networking and internships.

Graduates can pursue roles such as counselors, social workers, human resource specialists, or continue their education in clinical psychology, research, or education. As online learning options grow, so do the possibilities for achieving your psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Myrna F. Schwartz

Trending Scientists