World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
11752
World Ranking
3726
National Ranking
2089

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
12412
World Ranking
4009
National Ranking
1822

Julius Fridriksson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julius Fridriksson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 194 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Julius Fridriksson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julius Fridriksson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julius Fridriksson is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a strong specialization in Cognitive Neuroscience. They investigate topics broadly related to the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, acute ischemic stroke management, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, reading and literacy development, functional brain connectivity studies, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Their recent scholarly output includes publications such as Current Approaches to the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia (2021, Journal of Stroke), which has accrued 146 citations. Other notable papers in the field include works by frequent collaborators, reflecting an interdisciplinary focus spanning neurobiology and therapeutic intervention in language disorders following stroke. Notable recent papers associated with their research interests also appear in venues like Brain Communications and Neurobiology of Language, reflecting research on aphasia therapies and language network functionality.

The following are some of their recent papers:

  • Current Approaches to the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia, 2021, Journal of Stroke
  • Agrammatism and Paragrammatism: A Cortical Double Dissociation Revealed by Lesion-Symptom Mapping, 2020, Neurobiology of Language
  • Machine learning-based multimodal prediction of language outcomes in chronic aphasia, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Individualized response to semantic versus phonological aphasia therapies in stroke, 2021, Brain Communications
  • Functional differentiation in the language network revealed by lesion-symptom mapping, 2021, NeuroImage

Frequent co-authorships include collaborations with:

  • Chris Rorden
  • Leonardo Bonilha
  • Roger Newman-Norlund
  • Argye E. Hillis
  • Janina Wilmskoetter

Significant publication venues where the scientist has contributed multiple works include:

  • Brain Communications (10 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (8 publications)
  • Neurobiology of Language (5 publications)
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (5 publications)
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (5 publications)

Research topics associated with Julius Fridriksson illustrate a comprehensive approach to understanding language processing and rehabilitation, focusing on mechanisms underlying language deficits post-stroke and the use of neuroimaging and computational methods to map brain-language relationships. Their contributions reflect a multidisciplinary engagement involving clinical neurology, cognitive science, and neuroimaging methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization.

    Christopher Rorden;Leonardo Bonilha;Julius Fridriksson;Benjamin Bender

  • Using Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation to Treat Stroke Patients With Aphasia

    Julie M. Baker;Chris Rorden;Julius Fridriksson

  • Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient

    Abhishek Datta;Julie M. Baker;Marom Bikson;Julius Fridriksson

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Naming Reaction Time in Fluent Aphasia A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study

    Julius Fridriksson;Jessica D. Richardson;Julie M. Baker;Chris Rorden

  • Anatomy of aphasia revisited.

    Julius Fridriksson;Dirk Bart Den Ouden;Argye E. Hillis;Argye E. Hillis;Gregory Hickok

  • Impaired Speech Repetition and Left Parietal Lobe Damage

    Julius Fridriksson;Olafur Kjartansson;Paul S. Morgan;Haukur Hjaltason

  • Left hemisphere plasticity and aphasia recovery

    Julius Fridriksson;Jessica D. Richardson;Paul T. Fillmore;Bo Cai

  • Preservation and modulation of specific left hemisphere regions is vital for treated recovery from anomia in stroke.

    Julius Fridriksson

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Julius Fridriksson;Chris Rorden;Jordan Elm;Souvik Sen

  • Revealing the dual streams of speech processing.

    Julius Fridriksson;Grigori Yourganov;Leonardo Bonilha;Alexandra Basilakos

  • Damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus predicts non-fluent speech production in aphasia

    Julius Fridriksson;Dazhou Guo;Paul Fillmore;Audrey Holland

  • Functional communication and executive function in aphasia.

    Julius Fridriksson;Caroline Nettles;Mary Davis;Leigh Morrow

  • Multivariate Connectome-Based Symptom Mapping in Post-Stroke Patients: Networks Supporting Language and Speech

    Grigori Yourganov;Julius Fridriksson;Chris Rorden;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht

  • Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke.

    Jacek P. Dmochowski;Abhishek Datta;Yu Huang;Jessica D. Richardson

  • Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca’s aphasia to produce fluent speech

    Julius Fridriksson;H. Isabel Hubbard;Sarah Grace Hudspeth;Audrey L. Holland

  • Activity in Preserved Left Hemisphere Regions Predicts Anomia Severity in Aphasia

    Julius Fridriksson;Leonardo Bonilha;Julie M. Baker;Dana Moser

  • An evaluation of traditional and novel tools for lesion behavior mapping.

    Chris Rorden;Julius Fridriksson;Hans-Otto Karnath

  • Predicting aphasia type from brain damage measured with structural MRI.

    Grigori Yourganov;Kimberly G. Smith;Julius Fridriksson;Chris Rorden

  • Extrahippocampal gray matter loss and hippocampal deafferentation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

    Leonardo Bonilha;Jonathan C. Edwards;Stephen L. Kinsman;Paul S. Morgan

  • Current Approaches to the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia.

    Julius Fridriksson;Argye Elizabeth Hillis

  • Neural Correlates of Phonological and Semantic Based Anomia Treatment in Aphasia

    Julius Fridriksson;Dana Moser;Leonardo Bonilha;K. Leigh Morrow-Odom

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Rorden
Chris Rorden University of South Carolina
Leonardo Bonilha
Leonardo Bonilha Medical University of South Carolina
Gregory Hickok
Gregory Hickok University of California, Irvine
Argye E. Hillis
Argye E. Hillis Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht
Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht Medical University of South Carolina
Gordon C. Baylis
Gordon C. Baylis Western Kentucky University
Mark S. George
Mark S. George Medical University of South Carolina
Hans-Otto Karnath
Hans-Otto Karnath University of Tübingen
Rutvik H. Desai
Rutvik H. Desai University of South Carolina
Audrey Holland
Audrey Holland University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology graduates in the USA have a variety of career pathways to consider—one of the most popular is speech-language pathology. This field offers rewarding opportunities to help people develop essential communication skills. Individuals interested in pursuing this path must meet specific educational and certification requirements that differ by state.

For those in New Jersey, understanding slp requirements in New Jersey is crucial for licensure and practice. If you are considering New Mexico, learn how to become a speech language pathologist in New Mexico for a comprehensive overview of the steps involved. Those aiming to work in New York can discover how to become a speech language pathologist in New York, while aspiring professionals in North Carolina need to be aware of local North Carolina speech pathologist certification requirements.

Exploring online degrees in psychology or speech-language pathology can give you flexible options for advancing your education and meeting state requirements. Researching the certification process in your desired location is the first step toward a dynamic and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Julius Fridriksson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles