World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 71 2407 2202 1137 1024 348 18834

Leonardo Bonilha publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leonardo Bonilha between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leonardo Bonilha published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 14.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2021. 30 of the 395 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2021. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 9 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

395 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leonardo Bonilha: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 3
2001 1
2002 1
2003 9
2004 9
2005 6
2006 8
2007 14
2008 5
2009 12
2010 6
2011 4
2012 12
2013 6
2014 10
2015 17
2016 12
2017 22
2018 22
2019 34
2020 21
2021 37
2022 34
2023 28
2024 30
2025 29
2026 1
Total 395
Download as CSV

Leonardo Bonilha publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonardo Bonilha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 348–357 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 348 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96 348
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Leonardo Bonilha D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonardo Bonilha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210 71
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Leonardo Bonilha is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a particular focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, and Epidemiology.

Their work covers a range of topics centered on brain function and disorders. Key topics include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases.

Bonilha has authored multiple research papers, among which notable recent publications include:

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study (2020, Brain)
  • Network-based atrophy modeling in the common epilepsies: A worldwide ENIGMA study (2020, Science Advances)
  • Epilepsy and brain network hubs (2022, Epilepsia)
  • Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgical Outcomes Can Be Inferred Based on Structural Connectome Hubs: A Machine Learning Study (2020, Annals of Neurology)
  • Structural network alterations in focal and generalized epilepsy assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study follow axes of epilepsy risk gene expression (2022, Nature Communications)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bonilha include:

  • Julius Fridriksson
  • Chris Rorden
  • Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht
  • Janina Wilmskoetter
  • Simon S. Keller

Their publications are commonly found in journals such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Brain Communications, Neurology, Epilepsy & Behavior, and Brain.

Best Publications

  • Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping

    Chris Rorden;Hans-Otto Karnath;Leonardo Bonilha

  • Texture analysis of medical images.

    G. Castellano;L. Bonilha;L.M. Li;F. Cendes

  • Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization.

    Christopher Rorden;Leonardo Bonilha;Julius Fridriksson;Benjamin Bender

  • Anatomy of aphasia revisited.

    Julius Fridriksson;Dirk Bart Den Ouden;Argye E. Hillis;Argye E. Hillis;Gregory Hickok

  • Mapping anterior temporal lobe language areas with fMRI: a multicenter normative study.

    Jeffrey R. Binder;William L. Gross;Jane B. Allendorfer;Leonardo Bonilha

  • Network analysis for a network disorder: The emerging role of graph theory in the study of epilepsy.

    Boris C. Bernhardt;Boris C. Bernhardt;Leonardo Bonilha;Donald W. Gross

  • Stroke Assessment With Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging

    Edward S. Hui;Els Fieremans;Jens H. Jensen;Ali Tabesh

  • Impaired Speech Repetition and Left Parietal Lobe Damage

    Julius Fridriksson;Olafur Kjartansson;Paul S. Morgan;Haukur Hjaltason

  • Medial temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with neuronal fibre loss and paradoxical increase in structural connectivity of limbic structures

    Leonardo Bonilha;Travis Nesland;Gabriel U Martz;Jane E. Joseph

  • Voxel-Based Morphometry Reveals Gray Matter Network Atrophy in Refractory Medial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

    Leonardo Bonilha;Chris Rorden;Gabriela Castellano;Fabrício Pereira

  • Hippocampal tissue of patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with astrocyte activation, inflammation, and altered expression of channels and receptors

    Arabinda Das;Gerald C Wallace;Casey Holmes;Misty L McDowell

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study.

    Sean N Hatton;Khoa H Huynh;Leonardo Bonilha;Eugenio Abela

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Julius Fridriksson;Chris Rorden;Jordan Elm;Souvik Sen

  • Revealing the dual streams of speech processing.

    Julius Fridriksson;Grigori Yourganov;Leonardo Bonilha;Alexandra Basilakos

  • Seizure frequency and lateralization affect progression of atrophy in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    A. C. Coan;S. Appenzeller;L. Bonilha;L. M. Li

  • Epilepsy and brain network hubs

    Unknown

  • Multivariate Connectome-Based Symptom Mapping in Post-Stroke Patients: Networks Supporting Language and Speech

    Grigori Yourganov;Julius Fridriksson;Chris Rorden;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht

  • Parietal updating of limb posture: an event-related fMRI study.

    Asa Pellijeff;Leonardo Bonilha;Paul S. Morgan;Kirsten McKenzie

  • Network-based atrophy modeling in the common epilepsies: A worldwide ENIGMA study.

    Sara Larivière;Raúl Rodríguez-Cruces;Jessica Royer;Maria Eugenia Caligiuri

  • Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca’s aphasia to produce fluent speech

    Julius Fridriksson;H. Isabel Hubbard;Sarah Grace Hudspeth;Audrey L. Holland

  • Activity in Preserved Left Hemisphere Regions Predicts Anomia Severity in Aphasia

    Julius Fridriksson;Leonardo Bonilha;Julie M. Baker;Dana Moser

  • MRI Analysis in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Cortical Thinning and White Matter Disruptions Are Related to Side of Seizure Onset

    Nobuko Kemmotsu;Holly M. Girard;Boris C. Bernhardt;Boris C. Bernhardt;Leonardo Bonilha

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Rorden
Chris Rorden University of South Carolina
Julius Fridriksson
Julius Fridriksson University of South Carolina
Fernando Cendes
Fernando Cendes State University of Campinas
Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht
Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht Medical University of South Carolina
Simon S. Keller
Simon S. Keller University of Liverpool
Argye E. Hillis
Argye E. Hillis Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Gregory Hickok
Gregory Hickok University of California, Irvine
Guilherme Borges
Guilherme Borges Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría
Carrie R. McDonald
Carrie R. McDonald University of California, San Diego
Boris C. Bernhardt
Boris C. Bernhardt Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Leonardo Bonilha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles