World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
7691
World Ranking
6930
National Ranking
2992

Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 151 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with specific contributions to Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers a broad range of topics including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht has contributed to several recent publications, notably:

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study, 2020, Brain
  • Network-based atrophy modeling in the common epilepsies: A worldwide ENIGMA study, 2020, Science Advances
  • Epilepsy and brain network hubs, 2022, Epilepsia
  • Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgical Outcomes Can Be Inferred Based on Structural Connectome Hubs: A Machine Learning Study, 2020, Annals of Neurology
  • Structural network alterations in focal and generalized epilepsy assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study follow axes of epilepsy risk gene expression, 2022, Nature Communications

The scientist has frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Epilepsia, Neurology, Brain Communications, and Brain, reflecting a focus on neurological and brain research. The distribution of their publications includes 12 papers in bioRxiv, 7 in Epilepsia, 7 in Neurology, 6 in Brain Communications, and 4 in Brain.

Frequent collaborators include Leonardo Bonilha, Simon S. Keller, Carrie R. McDonald, Kathryn A. Davis, and Bernd Weber, with collaboration counts ranging from 16 to 44 joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Empathy in Clinical Practice: How Individual Dispositions, Gender, and Experience Moderate Empathic Concern, Burnout, and Emotional Distress in Physicians

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Jean Decety

  • A neuropsychological battery to detect specific executive and social cognitive impairments in early frontotemporal dementia

    Teresa Torralva;María Roca;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Tristán Bekinschtein

  • Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Liane Young

  • INECO Frontal Screening (IFS): a brief, sensitive, and specific tool to assess executive functions in dementia

    Teresa Torralva;Mariáa Roca;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Pablo López

  • Decision-making cognition in neurodegenerative diseases

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Agustín Ibáñez;María Roca;Teresa Torralva

  • Clinical effects of insular damage in humans

    Agustin Ibañez;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Facundo Manes

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study.

    Sean N Hatton;Khoa H Huynh;Leonardo Bonilha;Eugenio Abela

  • The relationship between different facets of empathy, pain perception and compassion fatigue among physicians

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Jean Decety

  • Educational Neuromyths Among Teachers in Latin America

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Benjamin Lira Luttges;Florencia Salvarezza;Anna Lucia Campos

  • Epilepsy and brain network hubs

    Unknown

  • Multivariate Connectome-Based Symptom Mapping in Post-Stroke Patients: Networks Supporting Language and Speech

    Grigori Yourganov;Julius Fridriksson;Chris Rorden;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht

  • Network-based atrophy modeling in the common epilepsies: A worldwide ENIGMA study.

    Sara Larivière;Raúl Rodríguez-Cruces;Jessica Royer;Maria Eugenia Caligiuri

  • The role of Area 10 (BA10) in human multitasking and in social cognition: A lesion study

    María Roca;Teresa Torralva;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Alexandra Woolgar

  • Connectomics and graph theory analyses: Novel insights into network abnormalities in epilepsy

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Madison Kocher;Leonardo Bonilha

  • Impairments in social cognition in early medicated and unmedicated Parkinson disease.

    María Roca;Teresa Torralva;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Anabel Chade

  • Connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping (CLSM): A novel approach to map neurological function

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Julius Fridriksson;Chris Rorden;Leonardo Bonilha

  • Selective impairment of cognitive empathy for moral judgment in adults with high functioning autism

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Teresa Torralva;Alexia Rattazzi;Victoria Marenco

  • Success of Anomia Treatment in Aphasia Is Associated With Preserved Architecture of Global and Left Temporal Lobe Structural Networks

    Leonardo Bonilha;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Travis Nesland;Chris Rorden

  • Structural network alterations in focal and generalized epilepsy assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study follow axes of epilepsy risk gene expression

    Unknown

  • The role of social cognition in moral judgment in frontotemporal dementia

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Teresa Torralva;María Roca;Mariángeles Pose

  • Deep learning applied to whole-brain connectome to determine seizure control after epilepsy surgery.

    Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Brent Munsell;Sonal Bhatia;William A. Vandergrift

  • Reproducibility of the Structural Brain Connectome Derived from Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

    Leonardo Bonilha;Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht;Julius Fridriksson;Chris Rorden

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA Epilepsy study

    Sean N Hatton;Khoa H Huynh;Leonardo Bonilha;Eugenio Abela

Frequent Co-Authors

Facundo Manes
Facundo Manes Favaloro University
Teresa Torralva
Teresa Torralva Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva
Leonardo Bonilha
Leonardo Bonilha Medical University of South Carolina
Julius Fridriksson
Julius Fridriksson University of South Carolina
Agustín Ibáñez
Agustín Ibáñez Adolfo Ibáñez University
Simon S. Keller
Simon S. Keller University of Liverpool
Chris Rorden
Chris Rorden University of South Carolina
Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh University of Tehran
Carrie R. McDonald
Carrie R. McDonald University of California, San Diego
Terence J. O'Brien
Terence J. O'Brien Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens the door to a wide variety of rewarding online degrees and professional certifications. For those interested in the intersection of mental health and societal well-being, pursuing affordable msw programs online can equip you for a career in social work with a neuroscience focus.

Those fascinated by behavioral science may consider bcba certification programs, which prepare students for roles in applied behavior analysis. Fast-tracking your education is also possible—several universities offer accelerated msw programs online, helping you enter the workforce more quickly.

If you're interested in understanding the human mind, an online psychology degree provides foundational knowledge relevant to neuroscience and other related fields. Each pathway offers unique opportunities for specialization and flexible study, supporting diverse career goals in neuroscience and allied professions.

Best Scientists Citing Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles