World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
5232
World Ranking
8333
National Ranking
1

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
5309
World Ranking
8168
National Ranking
1

Sandra Baez publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Baez sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 108 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sandra Baez D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Baez sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandra Baez is affiliated with Universidad de Los Andes in Colombia and has contributed extensively to research in neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. Their work encompasses a wide range of topics and subfields, highlighting a multidisciplinary approach to understanding brain function, cognitive aging, and mental health.

The researcher's work focuses primarily on areas including dementia and cognitive impairment research, functional brain connectivity studies, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development. Other main interests include the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, health, environment, and cognitive aging, as well as neural and behavioral psychology studies and mental health and psychiatry.

Baez's publication record includes notable recent papers such as:

  • Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders (2020, Brain)
  • Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan (2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia)
  • The neuroscience of sadness: A multidisciplinary synthesis and collaborative review (2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Brain clocks capture diversity and disparities in aging and dementia across geographically diverse populations (2024, Nature Medicine)
  • The role of social cognition skills and social determinants of health in predicting symptoms of mental illness (2020, Translational Psychiatry)

Their research has been frequently published in venues such as:

  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Nature Medicine
  • Scientific Reports
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Baez collaborates regularly with several coauthors, with the most frequent partners including:

  • Agustín Ibáñez
  • Hernando Santamaría-García
  • Sol Fittipaldi
  • Adolfo M. García
  • Joaquín Migeot

Within their fields of study, Baez has produced a considerable number of publications in neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. Subfields with significant contributions include cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, neurology, and social psychology.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders

    Simon Ducharme;Annemiek Dols;Robert Laforce;Emma Devenney

  • Men, women…who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition.

    Sandra Baez;Daniel Flichtentrei;María Prats;Ricardo Mastandueno

  • Dementia in Latin America: Assessing the present and envisioning the future

    Mario A. Parra;Sandra Baez;Ricardo Allegri;Ricardo Nitrini

  • Primary empathy deficits in frontotemporal dementia

    Sandra Baez;Facundo Manes;David Huepe;Teresa Torralva

  • Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke

    Indira García-Cordero;Lucas Sedeño;Lucas Sedeño;Laura de la Fuente;Laura de la Fuente;Andrea Slachevsky

  • Contextual Social Cognition Impairments in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

    Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Eduar Herrera;Lilian Villarin;Donna Theil

  • Structural neuroimaging of social cognition in progressive non-fluent aphasia and behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia

    Blas Couto;Facundo Manes;Patricia Montañés;Diana Matallana

  • How do you feel when you can't feel your body? Interoception, functional connectivity and emotional processing in depersonalization-derealization disorder.

    Lucas Sedeño;Blas Couto;Margherita Melloni;Andrés Canales-Johnson

  • Cortical deficits of emotional face processing in adults with ADHD: Its relation to social cognition and executive function

    Agustin Ibáñez;Agustin Petroni;Hugo Urquina;Fernando Torrente

  • Integrating intention and context: assessing social cognition in adults with Asperger syndrome

    Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Alexia Rattazzi;María Luz Gonzalez-Gadea;Teresa Torralva

  • Subliminal presentation of other faces (but not own face) primes behavioral and evoked cortical processing of empathy for pain.

    Agustín Ibáñez;Esteban Hurtado;Alejandro Lobos;Josefina Escobar

  • Your perspective and my benefit: multiple lesion models of self-other integration strategies during social bargaining.

    Margherita Melloni;Margherita Melloni;Pablo Billeke;Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Eugenia Hesse;Eugenia Hesse

  • Comparing Moral Judgments of Patients With Frontotemporal Dementia and Frontal Stroke

    Sandra Baez;Blas Couto;Blas Couto;Blas Couto;Teresa Torralva;Teresa Torralva;Luciano A. Sposato;Luciano A. Sposato

  • Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan.

    Mario Alfredo Parra;Sandra Baez;Lucas Sedeño;Cecilia Gonzalez Campo

  • Cognitive variability in adults with ADHD and AS: disentangling the roles of executive functions and social cognition.

    Maria Luz Gonzalez-Gadea;Sandra Baez;Teresa Torralva;Francisco Xavier Castellanos;Francisco Xavier Castellanos

  • The neural basis of decision-making and reward processing in adults with euthymic bipolar disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

    Agustin Ibanez;Agustin Ibanez;Agustin Ibanez;Marcelo Cetkovich;Agustin Petroni;Agustin Petroni;Hugo Urquina;Hugo Urquina

  • The neuroscience of sadness: A multidisciplinary synthesis and collaborative review.

    Juan A. Arias;Juan A. Arias;Claire Williams;Rashmi Raghvani;Moji Aghajani

  • Theory of mind and its relationship with executive functions and emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder

    Sandra Baez;Juan Marengo;Ana Perez;David Huepe

  • From neural signatures of emotional modulation to social cognition: individual differences in healthy volunteers and psychiatric participants

    Agustin Ibanez;Agustin Ibanez;Agustin Ibanez;Jaume Aguado;Sandra Baez;David Huepe

  • Orbitofrontal and limbic signatures of empathic concern and intentional harm in the behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

    Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Juan P. Morales;Andrea Slachevsky;Teresa Torralva;Teresa Torralva

  • Brain Network Organization and Social Executive Performance in Frontotemporal Dementia.

    Lucas Sedeño;Blas Couto;Indira García-Cordero;Margherita Melloni

  • Parkinson's disease compromises the appraisal of action meanings evoked by naturalistic texts

    Adolfo M. García;Yamile Bocanegra;Elena Herrera;Leonardo Moreno

Frequent Co-Authors

Agustín Ibáñez
Agustín Ibáñez Adolfo Ibáñez University
Facundo Manes
Facundo Manes Favaloro University
Adolfo M. García
Adolfo M. García University of San Andrés
Teresa Torralva
Teresa Torralva Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva
Mariano Sigman
Mariano Sigman Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Lucas Sedeño
Lucas Sedeño National Scientific and Technical Research Council
David Huepe
David Huepe Adolfo Ibáñez University
Jean Decety
Jean Decety University of Chicago
Oscar S. Gershanik
Oscar S. Gershanik Favaloro University
Olivier Piguet
Olivier Piguet University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career pathways that complement this field. Many students interested in neuroscience also explore social work or psychology, as these areas provide valuable skills for understanding human behavior and supporting mental health.

For those seeking affordability, options like cheap msw programs online allow you to earn a Master of Social Work without breaking the bank. If your career goals include behavior therapy or working with individuals on the autism spectrum, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst is a great option, and you can find quality bcba school online.

Accelerated programs are especially appealing for those eager to advance their careers quickly. Consider a social work accelerated program to enter the workforce sooner, or explore an accelerated psychology degree online for a faster route to licensure or advanced study. These options offer flexible and affordable pathways for anyone passionate about neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra Baez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles