World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8333 7784 1 1 101 5232
Neuroscience 40 8168 7542 1 1 108 5309

Sandra Baez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sandra Baez between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sandra Baez published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2016. 21 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2016. 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 10 publications
2011 2025

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sandra Baez: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 3
2012 3
2013 6
2014 11
2015 9
2016 17
2017 12
2018 5
2019 4
2020 14
2021 8
2022 12
2023 12
2024 11
2025 10
Total 137
Download as CSV

Sandra Baez publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Baez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 108 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 108
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Sandra Baez D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Baez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Sandra Baez is affiliated with Universidad de Los Andes in Colombia and has contributed extensively to research in neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. Their work encompasses a wide range of topics and subfields, highlighting a multidisciplinary approach to understanding brain function, cognitive aging, and mental health.

The researcher's work focuses primarily on areas including dementia and cognitive impairment research, functional brain connectivity studies, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development. Other main interests include the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, health, environment, and cognitive aging, as well as neural and behavioral psychology studies and mental health and psychiatry.

Baez's publication record includes notable recent papers such as:

  • Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders (2020, Brain)
  • Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan (2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia)
  • The neuroscience of sadness: A multidisciplinary synthesis and collaborative review (2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Brain clocks capture diversity and disparities in aging and dementia across geographically diverse populations (2024, Nature Medicine)
  • The role of social cognition skills and social determinants of health in predicting symptoms of mental illness (2020, Translational Psychiatry)

Their research has been frequently published in venues such as:

  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Nature Medicine
  • Scientific Reports
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Baez collaborates regularly with several coauthors, with the most frequent partners including:

  • Agustín Ibáñez
  • Hernando Santamaría-García
  • Sol Fittipaldi
  • Adolfo M. García
  • Joaquín Migeot

Within their fields of study, Baez has produced a considerable number of publications in neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. Subfields with significant contributions include cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, neurology, and social psychology.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders

    Simon Ducharme;Annemiek Dols;Robert Laforce;Emma Devenney

  • Men, women…who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition.

    Sandra Baez;Daniel Flichtentrei;María Prats;Ricardo Mastandueno

  • Dementia in Latin America: Assessing the present and envisioning the future

    Mario A. Parra;Sandra Baez;Ricardo Allegri;Ricardo Nitrini

  • Primary empathy deficits in frontotemporal dementia

    Sandra Baez;Facundo Manes;David Huepe;Teresa Torralva

  • Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke

    Indira García-Cordero;Lucas Sedeño;Lucas Sedeño;Laura de la Fuente;Laura de la Fuente;Andrea Slachevsky

  • Contextual Social Cognition Impairments in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

    Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Eduar Herrera;Lilian Villarin;Donna Theil

  • Structural neuroimaging of social cognition in progressive non-fluent aphasia and behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia

    Blas Couto;Facundo Manes;Patricia Montañés;Diana Matallana

  • How do you feel when you can't feel your body? Interoception, functional connectivity and emotional processing in depersonalization-derealization disorder.

    Lucas Sedeño;Blas Couto;Margherita Melloni;Andrés Canales-Johnson

  • Cortical deficits of emotional face processing in adults with ADHD: Its relation to social cognition and executive function

    Agustin Ibáñez;Agustin Petroni;Hugo Urquina;Fernando Torrente

  • Integrating intention and context: assessing social cognition in adults with Asperger syndrome

    Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Alexia Rattazzi;María Luz Gonzalez-Gadea;Teresa Torralva

  • Subliminal presentation of other faces (but not own face) primes behavioral and evoked cortical processing of empathy for pain.

    Agustín Ibáñez;Esteban Hurtado;Alejandro Lobos;Josefina Escobar

  • Your perspective and my benefit: multiple lesion models of self-other integration strategies during social bargaining.

    Margherita Melloni;Margherita Melloni;Pablo Billeke;Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Eugenia Hesse;Eugenia Hesse

  • Comparing Moral Judgments of Patients With Frontotemporal Dementia and Frontal Stroke

    Sandra Baez;Blas Couto;Blas Couto;Blas Couto;Teresa Torralva;Teresa Torralva;Luciano A. Sposato;Luciano A. Sposato

  • Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan.

    Mario Alfredo Parra;Sandra Baez;Lucas Sedeño;Cecilia Gonzalez Campo

  • Cognitive variability in adults with ADHD and AS: disentangling the roles of executive functions and social cognition.

    Maria Luz Gonzalez-Gadea;Sandra Baez;Teresa Torralva;Francisco Xavier Castellanos;Francisco Xavier Castellanos

  • The neural basis of decision-making and reward processing in adults with euthymic bipolar disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

    Agustin Ibanez;Agustin Ibanez;Agustin Ibanez;Marcelo Cetkovich;Agustin Petroni;Agustin Petroni;Hugo Urquina;Hugo Urquina

  • The neuroscience of sadness: A multidisciplinary synthesis and collaborative review.

    Juan A. Arias;Juan A. Arias;Claire Williams;Rashmi Raghvani;Moji Aghajani

  • Theory of mind and its relationship with executive functions and emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder

    Sandra Baez;Juan Marengo;Ana Perez;David Huepe

  • From neural signatures of emotional modulation to social cognition: individual differences in healthy volunteers and psychiatric participants

    Agustin Ibanez;Agustin Ibanez;Agustin Ibanez;Jaume Aguado;Sandra Baez;David Huepe

  • Orbitofrontal and limbic signatures of empathic concern and intentional harm in the behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

    Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Sandra Baez;Juan P. Morales;Andrea Slachevsky;Teresa Torralva;Teresa Torralva

  • Brain Network Organization and Social Executive Performance in Frontotemporal Dementia.

    Lucas Sedeño;Blas Couto;Indira García-Cordero;Margherita Melloni

  • Parkinson's disease compromises the appraisal of action meanings evoked by naturalistic texts

    Adolfo M. García;Yamile Bocanegra;Elena Herrera;Leonardo Moreno

Frequent Co-Authors

Agustín Ibáñez
Agustín Ibáñez Adolfo Ibáñez University
Facundo Manes
Facundo Manes Favaloro University
Adolfo M. García
Adolfo M. García University of San Andrés
Teresa Torralva
Teresa Torralva Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva
Mariano Sigman
Mariano Sigman Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Lucas Sedeño
Lucas Sedeño National Scientific and Technical Research Council
David Huepe
David Huepe Adolfo Ibáñez University
Jean Decety
Jean Decety University of Chicago
Oscar S. Gershanik
Oscar S. Gershanik Favaloro University
Olivier Piguet
Olivier Piguet University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career pathways that complement this field. Many students interested in neuroscience also explore social work or psychology, as these areas provide valuable skills for understanding human behavior and supporting mental health.

For those seeking affordability, options like cheap msw programs online allow you to earn a Master of Social Work without breaking the bank. If your career goals include behavior therapy or working with individuals on the autism spectrum, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst is a great option, and you can find quality bcba school online.

Accelerated programs are especially appealing for those eager to advance their careers quickly. Consider a social work accelerated program to enter the workforce sooner, or explore an accelerated psychology degree online for a faster route to licensure or advanced study. These options offer flexible and affordable pathways for anyone passionate about neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra Baez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles