World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frans-Jan W. Parmentier

Frans-Jan W. Parmentier

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
8943
World Ranking
7941
National Ranking
99

Frans-Jan W. Parmentier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans-Jan W. Parmentier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 109 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Frans-Jan W. Parmentier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans-Jan W. Parmentier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frans-Jan W. Parmentier is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway and works primarily within the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their research extensively covers Atmospheric Science and intersects with subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, and aspects of Management, Monitoring, Policy, and Law.

The main topics of their research include climate change and permafrost, cryospheric studies and observations, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, peatlands and wetlands ecology, methane hydrates and related phenomena, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, and plant water relations and carbon dynamics.

They have published a notable number of papers, including studies on the carbon cycle, ecosystem fluxes, and microbial dynamics across Arctic and boreal domains. Some of their recent publications are:

  • Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • The Arctic Carbon Cycle and Its Response to Changing Climate, 2021, Current Climate Change Reports
  • The Boreal-Arctic Wetland and Lake Dataset (BAWLD), 2021, Earth system science data
  • Modeled Microbial Dynamics Explain the Apparent Temperature Sensitivity of Wetland Methane Emissions, 2020, Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Frequent coauthors in their publications include E. S. Euskirchen, Oliver Sonnentag, Jennifer D. Watts, Brendan M. Rogers, and Edward A. G. Schuur.

The main venues where Frans-Jan W. Parmentier often publishes their work include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature Climate Change, Global Change Biology, Earth system science data, and the Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences.

Best Publications

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • The global methane budget 2000–2012

    Marielle Saunois;Philippe Bousquet;Ben Poulter;Anna Peregon

  • Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic

    Isla H. Myers-Smith;Jeffrey T. Kerby;Gareth K. Phoenix;Jarle W. Bjerke

  • Key indicators of Arctic climate change : 1971–2017

    Jason E. Box;William T. Colgan;Torben Røjle Christensen;Torben Røjle Christensen;Niels Martin Schmidt

  • Large loss of CO2 in winter observed across the northern permafrost region

    Susan M. Natali;Jennifer D. Watts;Brendan M. Rogers;Stefano Potter

  • The uncertain climate footprint of wetlands under human pressure

    Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu;Annalea Lohila;Juha-Pekka Tuovinen;Dennis D. Baldocchi

  • Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties

    Anna Maria Virkkala;Juha Aalto;Juha Aalto;Brendan M. Rogers;Torbern Tagesson;Torbern Tagesson

  • Methane emissions from permafrost thaw lakes limited by lake drainage

    J. van Huissteden;C. Berrittella;Frans-Jan Parmentier;Frans-Jan Parmentier;Y. Mi

  • The Cooling Capacity of Mosses: Controls on Water and Energy Fluxes in a Siberian Tundra Site

    Daan Blok;M.M.P.D. Heijmans;G. Schaepman-Strub;J. van Ruijven

  • The impact of lower sea-ice extent on Arctic greenhouse-gas exchange

    Frans-Jan W. Parmentier;Torben R. Christensen;Lise Lotte Sørensen;Søren Rysgaard;Søren Rysgaard

  • The growing season greenhouse gas balance of a continental tundra site in the Indigirka lowlands, NE Siberia

    M.K. van der Molen;J. van Huissteden;Frans-Jan Parmentier;A.M.R. Petrescu

  • Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000-2012

    Marielle Saunois;Philippe Bousquet;Ben Poulter;Anna Peregon

  • Modeling regional to global CH4 emissions of boreal and arctic wetlands

    A.M.R. Petrescu;L.P.H. van Beek;J. van Huissteden;C. Prigent

  • Implications of Arctic Sea Ice Decline for the Earth System

    Uma S. Bhatt;Donald A. Walker;John E. Walsh;Eddy C. Carmack

  • Longer growing seasons do not increase net carbon uptake in the northeastern Siberian tundra

    Frans-Jan Parmentier;Frans-Jan Parmentier;M. K. van der Molen;J. van Huissteden;S. A. Karsanaev

  • Testing the applicability of neural networks as a gap-filling method using CH 4 flux data from high latitude wetlands

    S. Dengel;D. Zona;D. Zona;T. Sachs;M. Aurela

  • The Boreal–Arctic Wetland and Lake Dataset (BAWLD)

    David Olefeldt;Mikael Hovemyr;McKenzie A. Kuhn;David Bastviken

  • Spatial and temporal dynamics in eddy covariance observations of methane fluxes at a tundra site in Northeastern Siberia

    Frans-Jan Parmentier;Frans-Jan Parmentier;J. van Huissteden;M. K. van der Molen;G. Schaepman-Strub

  • The Arctic Carbon Cycle and Its Response to Changing Climate

    Lori Bruhwiler;Frans Jan W. Parmentier;Frans Jan W. Parmentier;Patrick Crill;Mark Leonard;Mark Leonard

  • Modeled Microbial Dynamics Explain the Apparent Temperature Sensitivity of Wetland Methane Emissions

    Sarah E. Chadburn;Tuula Aalto;Mika Aurela;Dennis Baldocchi

  • Arctic carbon Cycling. Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA) 2017

    TR Christensen;Søren Rysgaard;Jørgen Bendtsen;RN Glud

  • Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000--2012 (in open review in ACPD) doi: 10.5194/acp-2017-296

    M. Saunois;P. Bousquet;B. Poulter;A. Peregon

  • Global Methane Budget 2000-2012

    M. Saunois;P. Bousquet;B. Poulter;A. Peregon

  • The Impact of a Lower Sea Ice Extent on Arctic Greenhouse Gas Exchange

    Frans-Jan W. Parmentier;Torben R. Christensen;Lise Lotte Sørensen;Søren Rysgaard

  • Modelling regional to global CH4 emissions of boreal and arctic wetlands

    A. M. R. Petrescu;L. P. H. van Beek;J. van Huissteden;C. Prigent

Frequent Co-Authors

Torben R. Christensen
Torben R. Christensen Aarhus University
Donatella Zona
Donatella Zona San Diego State University
Torsten Sachs
Torsten Sachs Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
Magnus Lund
Magnus Lund Aarhus University
Walter C. Oechel
Walter C. Oechel San Diego State University
Patrick M. Crill
Patrick M. Crill Stockholm University
Mika Aurela
Mika Aurela Finnish Meteorological Institute
Annalea Lohila
Annalea Lohila Finnish Meteorological Institute
Thomas Friborg
Thomas Friborg University of Copenhagen
A. J. Dolman
A. J. Dolman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring complementary online degrees can enhance career prospects and deepen subject expertise. A geology online degree provides foundational knowledge on Earth's materials and processes, which is essential for addressing environmental challenges like soil erosion and resource management.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are highly valued for analyzing spatial data relevant to environmental monitoring and planning. Programs recognized as the best GIS programs offer specialized training that can set candidates apart in roles involving environmental mapping and data visualization.

Leadership and public administration expertise are also critical for implementing environmental policies effectively. Pursuing 1 year MPA programs can equip professionals with the skills to manage environmental projects and influence sustainable decision-making within government or nonprofit sectors.

Understanding human behavior and social structures is another key aspect, making a sociology bachelor degree online a valuable option. This knowledge aids in crafting community-based solutions and addressing the societal impacts of environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Frans-Jan W. Parmentier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles