World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Russia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
8273
World Ranking
5282
National Ranking
2

Trofim C. Maximov publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trofim C. Maximov sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 201 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Trofim C. Maximov D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trofim C. Maximov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Russia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Russia Leader Award

Overview

Trofim C. Maximov is affiliated with the Russian Academy of Sciences in the Russian Federation. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with substantial contributions to the fields of Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, and Plant Science.

The scientist's work centers on key topics including:

  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Increasing contribution of peatlands to boreal evapotranspiration in a warming climate," 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • "FLUXNET-CH 4: a global, multi-ecosystem dataset and analysis of methane seasonality from freshwater wetlands," 2021, Earth System Science Data
  • "Presence of nanoplastics in rural and remote surface waters," 2022, Environmental Research Letters
  • "East Siberian Arctic inland waters emit mostly contemporary carbon," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Extremely wet summer events enhance permafrost thaw for multiple years in Siberian tundra," 2022, Nature Communications

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers including Atsuko Sugimoto, Roman Petrov, Sergey V. Karsanaev, Shunsuke Tei, and Tomoki Morozumi.

Their work has been published notably in venues such as:

  • Polar Science
  • Nature Communications
  • Earth System Science Data
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences

Best Publications

  • Global variability in leaf respiration in relation to climate, plant functional types and leaf traits

    Owen K. Atkin;Keith J. Bloomfield;Peter B. Reich;Peter B. Reich;Mark G. Tjoelker

  • Shrub expansion may reduce summer permafrost thaw in Siberian tundra

    Daan Blok;Monique M P D Heijmans;Gabriela Schaepman-Strub;Gabriela Schaepman-Strub;A. V. Kononov

  • Importance of permafrost as a source of water for plants in east Siberian taiga

    Atsuko Sugimoto;Nao Yanagisawa;Daisuke Naito;Noboru Fujita

  • 13CO2 pulse-labelling of photoassimilates reveals carbon allocation within and between tree rings

    Akira Kagawa;Atsuko Sugimoto;Trofim C. Maximov

  • Seasonal course of translocation, storage and remobilization of 13C pulse-labeled photoassimilate in naturally growing Larix gmelinii saplings

    Akira Kagawa;Atsuko Sugimoto;Trofim C. Maximov

  • Seasonal variation in the energy and water exchanges above and below a larch forest in eastern Siberia

    Takeshi Ohta;Takeshi Ohta;Tetsuya Hiyama;Hiroki Tanaka;Takashi Kuwada

  • An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory based, eddy covariance and inversion methods

    A. J. Dolman;A. Shvidenko;D. Schepaschenko;P. Ciais

  • Abrupt increases in soil temperatures following increased precipitation in a permafrost region, central Lena River basin, Russia

    Yoshihiro Iijima;Alexander N. Fedorov;Hotaek Park;Kazuyoshi Suzuki

  • Permafrost collapse after shrub removal shifts tundra ecosystem to a methane source

    Ake L. Nauta;Monique M. P. D. Heijmans;Daan Blok;Juul Limpens

  • The response of Arctic vegetation to the summer climate: relation between shrub cover, NDVI, surface albedo and temperature

    Daan Blok;Gabriela Schaepman-Strub;Harm Bartholomeus;Monique M P D Heijmans

  • Increasing contribution of peatlands to boreal evapotranspiration in a warming climate

    Manuel Helbig;Manuel Helbig;James Michael Waddington;Pavel Alekseychik;Brian D. Amiro

  • Methane emissions from permafrost thaw lakes limited by lake drainage

    J. van Huissteden;C. Berrittella;Frans-Jan Parmentier;Frans-Jan Parmentier;Y. Mi

  • Interannual variation of water balance and summer evapotranspiration in an eastern Siberian larch forest over a 7-year period (1998-2006)

    Takeshi Ohta;Trofim C. Maximov;A. Johannes Dolman;Taro Nakai

  • The Cooling Capacity of Mosses: Controls on Water and Energy Fluxes in a Siberian Tundra Site

    Daan Blok;M.M.P.D. Heijmans;G. Schaepman-Strub;J. van Ruijven

  • FLUXNET-CH4: a global, multi-ecosystem dataset and analysis of methane seasonality from freshwater wetlands

    Kyle B. Delwiche;Sara Helen Knox;Avni Malhotra;Etienne Fluet-Chouinard

  • High methane flux from an arctic floodplain (Indigirka lowlands, eastern Siberia)

    J. van Huissteden;T. C. Maximov;A. J. Dolman

  • Characteristics of soil moisture in permafrost observed in East Siberian taiga with stable isotopes of water

    A. Sugimoto;D. Naito;N. Yanagisawa;K. Ichiyanagi

  • The growing season greenhouse gas balance of a continental tundra site in the Indigirka lowlands, NE Siberia

    M.K. van der Molen;J. van Huissteden;Frans-Jan Parmentier;A.M.R. Petrescu

  • East Siberian Arctic inland waters emit mostly contemporary carbon.

    Joshua F. Dean;Joshua F. Dean;Ove H. Meisel;Melanie Martyn Rosco;Luca Belelli Marchesini

  • Comparing carbon storage of Siberian tundra and taiga permafrost ecosystems at very high spatial resolution

    Matthias B. Siewert;Jessica Hanisch;Jessica Hanisch;Niels Weiss;Peter Kuhry

  • Longer growing seasons do not increase net carbon uptake in the northeastern Siberian tundra

    Frans-Jan Parmentier;Frans-Jan Parmentier;M. K. van der Molen;J. van Huissteden;S. A. Karsanaev

Frequent Co-Authors

Takeshi Ohta
Takeshi Ohta Nagoya University
Monique M. P. D. Heijmans
Monique M. P. D. Heijmans Wageningen University & Research
Frank Berendse
Frank Berendse Wageningen University & Research
Gabriela Schaepman-Strub
Gabriela Schaepman-Strub University of Zurich
A. J. Dolman
A. J. Dolman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Hideki Kobayashi
Hideki Kobayashi Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
J. van Huissteden
J. van Huissteden Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Juul Limpens
Juul Limpens Wageningen University & Research
Frans-Jan W. Parmentier
Frans-Jan W. Parmentier University of Oslo
Liesje Mommer
Liesje Mommer Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career prospects. Many universities offer flexible options such as eds to edd programs online, which allow educators and researchers to advance their expertise while balancing work and life commitments.

Professionals focused on social and community aspects of environmental work might consider affordable options like an online dsw programs. These degrees support leadership roles in policy-making, advocacy, and sustainability initiatives.

For those seeking versatility, a cheap online general studies degree offers a broad foundation, which can be paired with environmental certifications to tailor unique career pathways. This is an excellent approach for students who want a comprehensive yet cost-effective education.

Additionally, if you are new to college-level study or prefer a less demanding program, exploring the easiest bachelor degree options might provide an accessible entry point into the field. These programs often emphasize flexibility and practical skills.

Best Scientists Citing Trofim C. Maximov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles