World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7351 7065 183 176 128 7641

Juul Limpens publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juul Limpens between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juul Limpens published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2024. 27 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2024. 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 10 publications
2003 2025

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juul Limpens: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 8
2004 4
2005 2
2006 2
2007 4
2008 7
2009 5
2010 0
2011 7
2012 1
2013 2
2014 7
2015 10
2016 9
2017 13
2018 10
2019 5
2020 9
2021 12
2022 8
2023 11
2024 17
2025 10
Total 163
Download as CSV

Juul Limpens publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juul Limpens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 128
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Juul Limpens D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juul Limpens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Juul Limpens is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily lies at the intersection of Environmental Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The scientist's work focuses on several key subfields, including Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Earth-Surface Processes. The main topics covered in their publications include:

  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Lichen and fungal ecology

Recent papers by Juul Limpens illustrate their research focus on permafrost, vegetation, and ecological dynamics in northern environments. Notable publications include:

  • Tundra vegetation change and impacts on permafrost, 2022, published in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Environmental drivers of Sphagnum growth in peatlands across the Holarctic region, 2020, published in Journal of Ecology
  • Extremely wet summer events enhance permafrost thaw for multiple years in Siberian tundra, 2022, published in Nature Communications
  • Rapid Vegetation Succession and Coupled Permafrost Dynamics in Arctic Thaw Ponds in the Siberian Lowland Tundra, 2020, published in Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Carbon to nitrogen ratio and quantity of organic amendment interactively affect crop growth and soil mineral N retention, 2022, published in Crop and Environment

Juul Limpens has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Rúna Í. Magnússon
  • David Kleijn
  • Monique M. P. D. Heijmans
  • Maartje van der Sloot
  • Gerlinde B. De Deyn

Their publications are often found in specialized scientific venues such as SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal of Ecology, The Science of The Total Environment, Ecosystems, and Ecological Indicators.

Best Publications

  • Peatlands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications - a synthesis

    J. Limpens;F. Berendse;Christian Blodau;J. G. Canadell

  • Atmospheric nitrogen deposition promotes carbon loss from peat bogs

    Luca Bragazza;Chris Freeman;Timothy Jones;Håkan Rydin

  • Tundra vegetation change and impacts on permafrost

    Unknown

  • Nitrogen content and d15N signature of ombrotrophic Sphagnum plants in Europe: to what extent is the increasing atmospheric N deposition altering the N-status of nutrient-poor mires?

    Luca Bragazza;Juul Limpens;Renato Gerdol;Philippe Grosvernier

  • Expansion of invasive species on ombrotrophic bogs: desiccation or high N deposition?

    Hilde B. M. Tomassen;Alfons J. P. Smolders;Juul Limpens;Leon P. M. Lamers

  • Nutritional constraints in ombrotrophic Sphagnum plants under increasing atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Europe

    Luca Bragazza;Teemu Tahvanainen;Lado Kutnar;Håkan Rydin

  • N deposition affects N availability in interstitial water, growth of Sphagnum and invasion of vascular plants in bog vegetation

    Juul Limpens;Frank Berendse;Herman Klees

  • How litter quality affects mass loss and N loss from decomposing Sphagnum

    Juul Limpens;Frank Berendse

  • Permafrost collapse after shrub removal shifts tundra ecosystem to a methane source

    Ake L. Nauta;Monique M. P. D. Heijmans;Daan Blok;Juul Limpens

  • Decreased summer water table depth affects peatland vegetation

    Angela Breeuwer;Bjorn J.M. Robroek;Bjorn J.M. Robroek;Juul Limpens;Monique M.P.D. Heijmans

  • Cell-wall polysaccharides play an important role in decay resistance of Sphagnum and actively depressed decomposition in vitro

    Tomáš Hájek;Simon Ballance;Juul Limpens;Mink Zijlstra

  • Climatic modifiers of the response to nitrogen deposition in peat-forming Sphagnum mosses: a meta-analysis

    J. Limpens;Gustaf Granath;Urban Gunnarsson;R. Aerts

  • Ecosystem responses to reduced and oxidised nitrogen inputs in European terrestrial habitats

    Carly J. Stevens;Pete Manning;Leon J.L. van den Berg;Leon J.L. van den Berg;Maaike C.C. de Graaf

  • Growth reduction of Sphagnum magellanicum subjected to high nitrogen deposition: the role of amino acid nitrogen concentration

    J. Limpens;F. Berendse

  • How Phosphorus Availability Affects the Impact of Nitrogen Deposition on Sphagnum and Vascular Plants in Bogs

    Juul Limpens;Frank Berendse;Herman Klees

  • Interactive effects of water table and precipitation on net CO2 assimilation of three co-occurring Sphagnum mosses differing in distribution above the water table

    Bjorn J. M. Robroek;Matthijs G. C. Schouten;Juul Limpens;Frank Berendse

  • The Nitrogen Cycle in Boreal Peatlands

    Juul Limpens;Monique M. P. D. Heijmans;Frank Berendse

  • Effects of water level and temperature on performance of four Sphagnum mosses

    Bjorn J.M. Robroek;Juul Limpens;Angela Breeuwer;Matthijs G.C. Schouten;Matthijs G.C. Schouten

  • Persistent versus transient tree encroachment of temperate peat bogs: effects of climate warming and drought events

    Monique M. P. D. Heijmans;Yasmijn A. M. van der Knaap;Yasmijn A. M. van der Knaap;Milena Holmgren;Juul Limpens

  • Positive shrub–tree interactions facilitate woody encroachment in boreal peatlands

    Milena Holmgren;Ching-Yen Lin;Julian E. Murillo;Annelies Nieuwenhuis

  • Can frequent precipitation moderate the impact of drought on peatmoss carbon uptake in northern peatlands

    Jelmer J. Nijp;Juul Limpens;Klaas Metselaar;Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee

  • The effect of increased temperature and nitrogen deposition on decomposition in bogs

    Angela Breeuwer;Monique Heijmans;Bjorn J. M. Robroek;Juul Limpens

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Berendse
Frank Berendse Wageningen University & Research
Monique M. P. D. Heijmans
Monique M. P. D. Heijmans Wageningen University & Research
Luca Bragazza
Luca Bragazza Agroscope
Bjorn J. M. Robroek
Bjorn J. M. Robroek Radboud University Medical Center
Mats Nilsson
Mats Nilsson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Trofim C. Maximov
Trofim C. Maximov Russian Academy of Sciences
Håkan Rydin
Håkan Rydin Uppsala University
Milena Holmgren
Milena Holmgren Wageningen University & Research
Matthias Peichl
Matthias Peichl Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Michal Hájek
Michal Hájek Masaryk University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up diverse career pathways, often complemented by interdisciplinary knowledge. For those interested in public administration roles within environmental organizations, exploring easiest online mpa programs can provide the necessary leadership and policy skills without a lengthy time commitment.

Understanding the social dimensions of environmental issues is equally important. A sociology bachelor degree online allows students to examine human behavior, societal impacts, and community engagement—key areas for effective environmental advocacy.

For education professionals aiming to influence environmental awareness and training, pursuing advanced credentials like online ed d programs without dissertation can offer flexible options to upgrade skills and knowledge without the traditional dissertation barrier.

When considering doctoral studies in education with a focus on environmental themes, it’s crucial to select from accredited eds to edd programs to ensure quality training and recognized credentials. These programs provide solid foundations for leadership roles in academia or environmental education administration.

Best Scientists Citing Juul Limpens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles