World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sally E. Shaywitz

Sally E. Shaywitz

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 81 1357 1208 812 704 181 38175

Sally E. Shaywitz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sally E. Shaywitz between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sally E. Shaywitz published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1998. 4 of the 194 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1998. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1972 2025

194 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sally E. Shaywitz: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 3
1979 2
1980 1
1981 2
1982 9
1983 2
1984 5
1985 7
1986 3
1987 2
1988 3
1989 3
1990 3
1991 5
1992 4
1993 2
1994 6
1995 7
1996 6
1997 5
1998 11
1999 10
2000 11
2001 11
2002 6
2003 6
2004 8
2005 6
2006 2
2007 7
2008 2
2009 2
2010 2
2011 0
2012 0
2013 2
2014 4
2015 1
2016 2
2017 2
2018 2
2019 3
2020 4
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
Total 194
Download as CSV

Sally E. Shaywitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sally E. Shaywitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 181
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sally E. Shaywitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sally E. Shaywitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120 81
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1998 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Sally E. Shaywitz is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within psychology and social sciences, with a significant concentration in developmental and educational psychology. Major subfields explored include education, statistics and probability, psychiatry and mental health, and information systems.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to reading and literacy development, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, educational methods and media use, disability education and employment, child development and digital technology, and early childhood education and development.

Notable recent publications authored or coauthored by Sally E. Shaywitz include:

  • "Dyslexia in the 21st century" (2020) in Current Opinion in Psychiatry
  • "The American experience: towards a 21st century definition of dyslexia" (2020) in Oxford Review of Education
  • "The Yale Outcome Study: Outcomes for graduates with and without dyslexia." (2020) in Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology
  • "Early reading at first grade predicts adult reading at age 42 in typical and dyslexic readers" (2023) in npj Science of Learning
  • "Family history is not useful in screening children for dyslexia." (2021) in Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology

The frequent coauthors collaborating with this scientist include Bennett A. Shaywitz, John M. Holahan, Emilio Ferrer, and Jack M. Fletcher.

Common publication venues for their research are:

  • Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology
  • npj Science of Learning
  • UNC Libraries
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry
  • Oxford Review of Education

Awards received by Sally E. Shaywitz include designation as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2020 and membership in the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) since 1998.

Best Publications

  • A Definition of Dyslexia.

    G. Reid Lyon;Sally E. Shaywitz;Bennett A. Shaywitz

  • Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language

    Bennett A. Shaywitz;Sally E. Shaywltz;Kenneth R. Pugh;Kenneth R. Pugh;R. Todd Constable

  • Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia.

    Bennett A Shaywitz;Sally E Shaywitz;Kenneth R Pugh;Kenneth R Pugh;W.Einar Mencl;W.Einar Mencl

  • Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls. Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study.

    Sally E. Shaywitz;Bennett A. Shaywitz;Jack M. Fletcher;Michael D. Escobar

  • Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia

    S E Shaywitz;B A Shaywitz;K R Pugh;R K Fulbright

  • Developmental Lag versus Deficit Models of Reading Disability: A Longitudinal, Individual Growth Curves Analysis.

    David J. Francis;Sally E. Shaywitz;Karla K. Stuebing;Bennett A. Shaywitz

  • Dyslexia (Specific Reading Disability)

    Sally E. Shaywitz;Bennett A. Shaywitz

  • Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions.

    Jack M. Fletcher;Sally E. Shaywitz;Donald P. Shankweiler;Leonard Katz

  • Evidence That Dyslexia May Represent the Lower Tail of a Normal Distribution of Reading Ability

    Sally E. Shaywitz;Michael D. Escobar;Bennett A. Shaywitz;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically- based intervention.

    Bennett A Shaywitz;Sally E Shaywitz;Benita A Blachman;Kenneth R Pugh;Kenneth R Pugh

  • Cerebral organization of component processes in reading

    Pugh Kr;Shaywitz Ba;Shaywitz Se;Constable Rt

  • Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia)

    Kenneth R. Pugh;Kenneth R. Pugh;W. Einar Mencl;W. Einar Mencl;Annette R. Jenner;Annette R. Jenner;Leonard Katz;Leonard Katz

  • Persistence of dyslexia: the Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence.

    Sally E. Shaywitz;Jack M. Fletcher;John M. Holahan;Abigail E. Shneider

  • Current concepts: Dyslexia.

    Sally E. Shaywitz

  • Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core.

    Robin D. Morris;Karla K. Stuebing;Jack M. Fletcher;Sally E. Shaywitz

  • Overcoming Dyslexia: A New and Complete Science-Based Program for Reading Problems at Any Level

    Sally E. Shaywitz

  • Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability.

    Kenneth R Pugh;Kenneth R Pugh;W.Einar Mencl;W.Einar Mencl;Annette R Jenner;Annette R Jenner;Leonard Katz;Leonard Katz

  • Validity of IQ-Discrepancy Classifications of Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis

    Karla K. Stuebing;Jack M. Fletcher;Josette M. LeDoux;G. Reid Lyon

  • Neural systems for compensation and persistence: young adult outcome of childhood reading disability.

    Sally E Shaywitz;Bennett A Shaywitz;Robert K Fulbright;Pawel Skudlarski

  • Cognitive Profiles of Reading-Disabled Children: Comparison of Language Skills in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax

    D. Shankweiler;D. Shankweiler;S. Crain;S. Crain;L. Katz;L. Katz;A.E. Fowler

Frequent Co-Authors

Bennett A. Shaywitz
Bennett A. Shaywitz Yale University
Kenneth R. Pugh
Kenneth R. Pugh Haskins Laboratories
Leonard Katz
Leonard Katz Haskins Laboratories
John C. Gore
John C. Gore Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Robert K. Fulbright
Robert K. Fulbright Yale University
W. Einar Mencl
W. Einar Mencl Yale University
Pawel Skudlarski
Pawel Skudlarski Yale University
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
Donald J. Cohen
Donald J. Cohen Yale University
Donald Shankweiler
Donald Shankweiler University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Psychology, you may also want to explore related pathways like Social Work. Many universities now offer flexible, high-quality online options that can open doors to rewarding careers in mental health, counseling, and community outreach.

For those interested in starting at the undergraduate level, the best online social work bachelor's programs in the US provide a solid foundation. If location is important to you, there are specialized recommendations, such as the top online social work programs in California and top online social work programs in Florida.

For those aiming for leadership roles or clinical practice, advancing to graduate studies may be ideal. Doctoral options, like the best online dsw programs in America, prepare learners for high-level positions and research opportunities.

Exploring these online degrees can help you match your interests with your career goals and ensure flexibility as you balance your studies with professional or personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Sally E. Shaywitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles