World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
14159
World Ranking
7096
National Ranking
3833

Karla K. Stuebing publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karla K. Stuebing sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karla K. Stuebing D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karla K. Stuebing sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karla K. Stuebing is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Psychology with a subfield focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their work broadly addresses topics related to Reading and Literacy Development, reflecting a consistent thematic interest across multiple research outputs.

Frequent collaborators in Karla K. Stuebing's research include Jack Μ. Fletcher, Bennett A. Shaywitz, Sally E. Shaywitz, Byron P. Rourke, and David J. Francis.

  • Jack Μ. Fletcher
  • Bennett A. Shaywitz
  • Sally E. Shaywitz
  • Byron P. Rourke
  • David J. Francis

Best Publications

  • Developmental Lag versus Deficit Models of Reading Disability: A Longitudinal, Individual Growth Curves Analysis.

    David J. Francis;Sally E. Shaywitz;Karla K. Stuebing;Bennett A. Shaywitz

  • Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions.

    Jack M. Fletcher;Sally E. Shaywitz;Donald P. Shankweiler;Leonard Katz

  • Persistence of dyslexia: the Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence.

    Sally E. Shaywitz;Jack M. Fletcher;John M. Holahan;Abigail E. Shneider

  • Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core.

    Robin D. Morris;Karla K. Stuebing;Jack M. Fletcher;Sally E. Shaywitz

  • Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity.

    Robert D. Pritchard;Steven D. Jones;Philip L. Roth;Karla K. Stuebing

  • Validity of IQ-Discrepancy Classifications of Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis

    Karla K. Stuebing;Jack M. Fletcher;Josette M. LeDoux;G. Reid Lyon

  • Cognitive Profiles of Reading-Disabled Children: Comparison of Language Skills in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax

    D. Shankweiler;D. Shankweiler;S. Crain;S. Crain;L. Katz;L. Katz;A.E. Fowler

  • Psychometric Approaches to the Identification of LD IQ and Achievement Scores Are Not Sufficient

    David J. Francis;Jack M. Fletcher;Karla K. Stuebing;G. Reid Lyon

  • Comprehension and Decoding: Patterns of Association in Children With Reading Difficulties

    Donald Shankweiler;Eric Lundquist;Leonard Katz;Karla K. Stuebing

  • A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Struggling Readers in Grades 4–12: 1980–2011

    Nancy K. Scammacca;Gregory J Roberts;Sharon Vaughn;Karla K. Stuebing

  • The Flynn Effect: A Meta-analysis

    Lisa H. Trahan;Karla K. Stuebing;Jack M. Fletcher;Merrill Hiscock

  • Analysis of change: modeling individual growth.

    David J. Francis;Jack M. Fletcher;Karla K. Stuebing;Kevin C. Davidson

  • Executive Functioning Deficits in Attention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Are Independent of Oppositional Defiant or Reading Disorder

    Rafael Klorman;Leslie A. Hazel-Fernandez;Sally E. Shaywitz;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities.

    Jack M. Fletcher;David J. Francis;Sally E. Shaywitz;G. Reid Lyon

  • Problem Solving and Computational Skill: Are They Shared or Distinct Aspects of Mathematical Cognition?

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs;Karla K. Stuebing;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation.

    Jack M. Fletcher;G. Reid Lyonm;Marcia Barnes;Karla K. Stuebing

  • A Matthew effect for IQ but not for reading : results from a longitudinal study

    Bennett A. Shaywitz;Theodore R. Holford;John M. Holahan;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Meta-Analysis With Complex Research Designs Dealing With Dependence From Multiple Measures and Multiple Group Comparisons

    Nancy Scammacca;Gregory J Roberts;Karla K. Stuebing

  • Classification of Learning Disabilities: An Evidence-Based Evaluation. Executive Summary.

    Jack M. Fletcher;G. Reid Lyon;Marcia Barnes;Karla K. Stuebing

  • Relationship between quality of life and mood in long-term survivors of breast cancer treated with mastectomy

    M. A. Weitzner;C. A. Meyers;Karla K. Stuebing;Angele K. Saleeba

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
David J. Francis
David J. Francis University of Houston
Bennett A. Shaywitz
Bennett A. Shaywitz Yale University
Sally E. Shaywitz
Sally E. Shaywitz Yale University
Sharon Vaughn
Sharon Vaughn The University of Texas at Austin
Paul T. Cirino
Paul T. Cirino University of Houston
Carolyn A. Denton
Carolyn A. Denton The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Linda Ewing-Cobbs
Linda Ewing-Cobbs The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Leonard Katz
Leonard Katz Haskins Laboratories
Donald Shankweiler
Donald Shankweiler University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of career pathways, including vital roles in mental health support. One high-demand option is becoming a substance abuse counselor, a career path that requires a mix of education, practical training, and state-specific certifications.

Each city has its own set of requirements. For those considering how to become a substance abuse counselor in New Orleans, the process typically involves obtaining an accredited degree, supervised clinical experience, and passing a state exam. In contrast, the New York City substance abuse counselor certification requirements include additional credentialing and background checks specific to the state.

If you are interested in similar roles elsewhere, learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Newark or becoming a substance abuse counselor in Norfolk will provide you with clear steps based on local regulations and job prospects.

With a psychology degree, you can pursue a rewarding path in substance abuse counseling, equipped to meet the unique certification and licensure standards of your chosen city.

Best Scientists Citing Karla K. Stuebing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles