World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maureen W. Lovett

Maureen W. Lovett

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
7629
World Ranking
9094
National Ranking
613

Maureen W. Lovett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen W. Lovett sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Maureen W. Lovett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen W. Lovett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maureen W. Lovett is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology, genetics, and educational development. Their research primarily covers developmental and educational psychology, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience, with a focus on topics related to reading and literacy development, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, and language development and disorders.

The scientist's publication record includes work in a variety of recognized journals and venues. Some frequent publication outlets are Nature Genetics, Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Learning Disabilities, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Maureen W. Lovett include:

  • Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia, 2022, Nature Genetics
  • Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Genome-wide association study of word reading: Overlap with risk genes for neurodevelopmental disorders, 2020, Genes Brain & Behavior
  • Effective intervention for adolescents with reading disabilities: Combining reading and motivational remediation to improve outcomes, 2020, Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Language Difficulties in School-Age Children With Developmental Dyslexia, 2021, Journal of Learning Disabilities

The following co-authors have frequently collaborated with Maureen W. Lovett:

  • Cathy L. Barr
  • Sharon Guger
  • Elizabeth Kerr
  • Karen Wigg
  • Kaitlyn M. Price

The key research topics explored in their work include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research

Main fields of study in which Maureen W. Lovett has significant research output are psychology and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Subfields include developmental and educational psychology, genetics, cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, and education.

Best Publications

  • Remediating the Core Deficits of Developmental Reading Disability A Double-Deficit Perspective

    Maureen W. Lovett;Karen A. Steinbach;Jan C. Frijters

  • Measuring socioeconomic status: Reliability and preliminary validity for different approaches.

    Paul T. Cirino;Christopher E. Chin;Rose A. Sevcik;Maryanne Wolf

  • The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia

    Maryanne Wolf;Alyssa Goldberg O'Rourke;Calvin Gidney;Maureen Lovett

  • Treating the Core Deficits of Developmental Dyslexia: Evidence of Transfer of Learning after Phonologically- and Strategy-Based Reading Training Programs.

    Maureen W. Lovett;Susan L. Borden;Teresa DeLuca;Léa Lacerenza

  • Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes.

    Maureen W. Lovett;Léa Lacerenza;Susan L. Borden;Jan C. Frijters

  • The Relationship Among Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary, Listening Comprehension, Pre-Reading Skills, Word Identification Skills, and Reading Comprehension by Children With Reading Disabilities

    Justin C. Wise;Rose A. Sevcik;Robin D. Morris;Maureen W. Lovett

  • A developmental approach to reading disability: accuracy and speed criteria of normal and deficient reading skill.

    Maureen W. Lovett

  • Reading fluency: the whole is more than the parts.

    Tami Katzir;Youngsuk Kim;Maryanne Wolf;Beth O’Brien

  • Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes.

    Maureen W. Lovett;Jan C. Frijters;Maryanne Wolf;Karen A. Steinbach

  • Putting Struggling Readers on the PHAST Track A Program to Integrate Phonological and Strategy-Based Remedial Reading Instruction and Maximize Outcomes

    Maureen W. Lovett;Léa Lacerenza;Susan L. Borden

  • Multiple-Component Remediation for Developmental Reading Disabilities IQ, Socioeconomic Status, and Race as Factors in Remedial Outcome

    Robin D. Morris;Maureen W. Lovett;Maryanne Wolf;Rose A. Sevcik

  • Training the word recognition skills of reading disabled children : treatment and transfer effects

    Maureen W. Lovett;Patricia M. Warren-Chaplin;Marilyn J. Ransby;Susan L. Borden

  • The Effectiveness of Remedial Programs for Reading Disabled Children of Different Ages: Does the Benefit Decrease for Older Children?.

    Maureen W. Lovett;Karen A. Steinbach

  • Support for EKN1 as the susceptibility locus for dyslexia on 15q21.

    K G Wigg;J M Couto;Y Feng;B Anderson

  • Interventions for Reading Difficulties A Comparison of Response to Intervention by ELL and EFL Struggling Readers

    Maureen W. Lovett;Maria De Palma;Jan Frijters;Karen Steinbach

  • Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people

    Unknown

  • The Relationship between Different Measures of Oral Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension in Second-Grade Students Who Evidence Different Oral Reading Fluency Difficulties.

    Justin C. Wise;Rose A. Sevcik;Robin D. Morris;Maureen W. Lovett

  • Can Dyslexia Be Treated? Treatment-Specific and Generalized Treatment Effects in Dyslexic Children's Response to Remediation

    Maureen W. Lovett;Maureen W. Lovett;Marilyn J. Ransby;Noreen Hardwick;Marie S. Johns

  • A developmental perspective on reading dysfunction: accuracy and rate criteria in the subtyping of dyslexic children.

    Maureen W Lovett

  • The Varieties of Pathways to Dysfluent Reading Comparing Subtypes of Children With Dyslexia at Letter, Word, and Connected Text Levels of Reading

    Tami Katzir;Young-Suk Kim;Maryanne Wolf;Robin Morris

  • Evaluating the Efficacy of Remediation for Struggling Readers in High School

    Maureen W. Lovett;Léa Lacerenza;Maria De Palma;Jan C. Frijters

Frequent Co-Authors

Maryanne Wolf
Maryanne Wolf Tufts University
Robin G. Morris
Robin G. Morris King's College London
Cathy L. Barr
Cathy L. Barr University Health Network
Rose A. Sevcik
Rose A. Sevcik Georgia State University
E. Mark Mahone
E. Mark Mahone Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Paul T. Cirino
Paul T. Cirino University of Houston
Erik G. Willcutt
Erik G. Willcutt University of Colorado Boulder
Rosemary Tannock
Rosemary Tannock University of Toronto
Simon E. Fisher
Simon E. Fisher Max Planck Society
Richard K. Olson
Richard K. Olson University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a range of rewarding career pathways. Many students are interested in roles promoting mental health and behavioral support, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The process for becoming a bcba in Anchorage involves meeting state-specific education and supervised experience requirements.

Similarly, if you are considering becoming a bcba in Arlington or becoming a bcba in Atlanta, you will need to follow licensure protocols tailored to each location. Demand for skilled BCBAs is growing nationwide, so understanding local requirements is essential.

For those in Colorado, Aurora bcba requirements specify coursework, practicum hours, and examination standards. These career pathways often start with an accredited online psychology degree and can lead to diverse roles in education, healthcare, or private practice. Pursuing these credentials enhances both your expertise and career mobility within the ever-evolving field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Maureen W. Lovett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles