World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Karin Landerl

Karin Landerl

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
13387
World Ranking
6312
National Ranking
30

Karin Landerl publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karin Landerl sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karin Landerl D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karin Landerl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karin Landerl is affiliated with the University of Graz in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on developmental and educational psychology, with particular attention to reading and literacy development, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, and genetics related to neurodevelopmental disorders.

The scientist has contributed extensively across various fields of study, including:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Mathematics

Their specialized research areas include subfields such as:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Genetics

Among the main topics addressed in their work are:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Language Development and Disorders

Their recent notable publications include:

  • "Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia," 2022, Nature Genetics
  • "Genome-wide association study reveals new insights into the heritability and genetic correlates of developmental dyslexia," 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Cognitive Precursors of Reading: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective," 2021, Scientific Studies of Reading
  • "Home Literacy Environment and Early Literacy Development Across Languages Varying in Orthographic Consistency," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology

Landerl frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Chiara Banfi
  • Anna Steiner
  • Sabrina Finke
  • Kristina Moll
  • Ferenc Kemény

They have published in key venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Nature Genetics
  • Scientific Studies of Reading
  • Cognitive Development
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Best Publications

  • Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students

    Karin Landerl;Anna Bevan;Brian Butterworth

  • Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up.

    Karin Landerl;Heinz Wimmer

  • The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison

    Karin Landerl;Heinz Wimmer;Uta Frith

  • The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography

    Heinz Wimmer;Heinz Mayringer;Karin Landerl

  • Dyslexia and Dyscalculia: Two Learning Disorders with Different Cognitive Profiles.

    Karin Landerl;Barbara Fussenegger;Kristina Moll;Edith Willburger

  • Comorbidity of learning disorders: prevalence and familial transmission.

    Karin Landerl;Kristina Moll

  • Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity

    Karin Landerl;Karin Landerl;Franck Ramus;Kristina Moll;Kristina Moll;Heikki Lyytinen

  • Differences in Phonological Recoding in German- and English-Speaking Children.

    Uta Frith;Heinz Wimmer;Karin Landerl

  • Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies

    Kristina Moll;Franck Ramus;Juergen Bartling;Jennifer Bruder

  • The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: more consequence than precondition but still important.

    Heinz Wimmer;Karin Landerl;Renate Linortner;Peter Hummer

  • Poor Reading: A Deficit in Skill-Automatization or a Phonological Deficit?

    Heinz Wimmer;Heinz Mayringer;Karin Landerl

  • Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: Evidence from German and English children.

    Karin Landerl;Heinz Wimmer

  • Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming as Longitudinal Predictors of Reading in Five Alphabetic Orthographies with Varying Degrees of Consistency

    Karin Landerl;H. Harald Freudenthaler;Moritz Heene;Peter F. De Jong

  • Cognitive Risk Factors for Specific Learning Disorder Processing Speed, Temporal Processing, and Working Memory

    Kristina Moll;Silke M. Göbel;Debbie Gooch;Karin Landerl

  • RAN Is Not a Measure of Orthographic Processing. Evidence from the Asymmetric German Orthography.

    Kristina Moll;Barbara Fussenegger;Edith Willburger;Karin Landerl

  • Typical and atypical development of basic numerical skills in elementary school.

    Karin Landerl;Christina Kölle

  • Naming speed in dyslexia and dyscalculia

    Edith Willburger;Barbara Fussenegger;Kristina Moll;Guilherme Wood

  • Double Dissociation Between Reading and Spelling Deficits

    Kristina Moll;Karin Landerl

  • Training Reading Fluency in Dysfluent Readers with High Reading Accuracy: Word Specific Effects but Low Transfer to Untrained Words.

    Verena Thaler;Eva Maria Ebner;Heinz Wimmer;Karin Landerl

  • Subitizing and Counting in Typical and Atypical Development.

    Patrick Schleifer;Karin Landerl

Frequent Co-Authors

Kristina Moll
Kristina Moll Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Heinz Wimmer
Heinz Wimmer University of Salzburg
Gerd Schulte-Körne
Gerd Schulte-Körne Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Daniel Brandeis
Daniel Brandeis University of Zurich
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bertram Müller-Myhsok Max Planck Society
Urs Maurer
Urs Maurer Chinese University of Hong Kong
Heikki Lyytinen
Heikki Lyytinen University of Jyväskylä
Juha Kere
Juha Kere Karolinska Institute
Andrew P. Morris
Andrew P. Morris University of Liverpool
Markus M. Nöthen
Markus M. Nöthen University Hospital Bonn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open the door to a variety of rewarding careers. Many students interested in mental health, counseling, and community support also explore social work as a closely related field. One of the great advantages today is the growing availability of affordable online degree programs, making career advancement more accessible than ever.

For those considering a parallel path, there are several cheapest online social work degrees in Boise that offer both quality education and flexibility. Similarly, students can look into cheapest online social work programs in Kentucky for more budget-friendly options. In Massachusetts, there are also affordable online social work degrees in Massachusetts, which can be ideal for those residing in or considering relocating to the Northeast.

Additionally, those seeking a graduate-level credential may explore the cheapest online msw programs in the South, offering a pathway to advanced clinical or leadership roles in the field. Exploring these online options can help students find the right fit for their budget and career goals, complementing their psychology education.

Best Scientists Citing Karin Landerl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles