World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 114 339 297 54 47 388 47363

Charles Hulme publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles Hulme between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles Hulme published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2011. 18 of the 431 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2011. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 42 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 8 publications
1977 2025

431 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles Hulme: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 2
1981 3
1982 1
1983 4
1984 5
1985 2
1986 4
1987 3
1988 6
1989 5
1990 2
1991 8
1992 8
1993 6
1994 15
1995 10
1996 8
1997 8
1998 5
1999 7
2000 2
2001 3
2002 4
2003 3
2004 4
2005 17
2006 9
2007 2
2008 19
2009 7
2010 5
2011 42
2012 25
2013 23
2014 24
2015 11
2016 14
2017 13
2018 14
2019 22
2020 12
2021 16
2022 6
2023 2
2024 10
2025 8
Total 431
Download as CSV

Charles Hulme publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Hulme sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–390 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 388 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58 388
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles Hulme D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Hulme sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32 114
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2014 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Charles Hulme is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a particular emphasis on developmental and educational psychology. Other subfields include genetics, education, statistics and probability, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their scholarly output covers key topics such as:

  • Reading and literacy development
  • Language development and disorders
  • Educational and psychological assessments
  • Genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Child development and digital technology
  • Genetic associations and epidemiology

Hulme has been a contributor to major publication venues including:

  • ISRCTN Registry
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Developmental Science
  • Reading and Writing

Frequent coauthors include Maggie Snowling, Gillian West, Margaret J. Snowling, Cameron Downing, and Manon Jones.

Their recent papers include:

  • "Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia," 2022, Nature Genetics
  • "Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Children's Language Skills Can Be Improved: Lessons From Psychological Science for Educational Policy," 2020, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • "Is a procedural learning deficit a causal risk factor for developmental language disorder or dyslexia? A meta-analytic review," 2021, Developmental Psychology
  • "Early language screening and intervention can be delivered successfully at scale: evidence from a cluster randomized controlled trial," 2021, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Among distinctions, Hulme is a Member of Academia Europaea since 2014 and a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review

    Monica Melby-Lervåg;Charles Hulme

  • Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: evidence from a longitudinal study.

    Valerie Muter;Charles Hulme;Margaret J. Snowling;Jim Stevenson

  • Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review.

    Monica Melby-Lervåg;Solveig-Alma Halaas Lyster;Charles Hulme

  • Ameliorating Early Reading Failure by Integrating the Teaching of Reading and Phonological Skills: The Phonological Linkage Hypothesis

    Peter J. Hatcher;Charles Hulme;Andrew W. Ellis

  • Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span

    Charles Hulme;Sarah Maughan;Gordon D.A Brown

  • Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of "Far Transfer": Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review.

    Monica Melby-Lervåg;Thomas S. Redick;Charles Hulme

  • Oscillator-based memory for serial order

    Gordon D. A. Brown;Tim Preece;Charles Hulme

  • The science of reading: A handbook.

    Margaret J. Snowling;Charles Hulme

  • Developmental Disorders of Language Learning and Cognition

    Charles Hulme;Margaret J. Snowling

  • The Foundations of Spelling Ability: Evidence from a 3-Year Longitudinal Study

    Markéta Caravolas;Charles Hulme;Margaret J. Snowling

  • Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness.

    Charles Hulme;Peter J. Hatcher;Kate Nation;Angela Brown

  • The development of phonological awareness in preschool children.

    Julia M. Carroll;Margaret J. Snowling;Charles Hulme;Jim Stevenson

  • Common Patterns of Prediction of Literacy Development in Different Alphabetic Orthographies

    Markéta Caravolas;Arne Lervåg;Petroula Mousikou;Corina Efrim

  • Speech Rate and the Development of Short-Term Memory Span.

    Charles Hulme;Neil Thomson;Clare Muir;Amanda Lawrence

  • Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall

    Charles Hulme;Steven Roodenrys;Steven Roodenrys;Richard Schweickert;Gordon D. A. Brown

  • Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia

    Fumiko Hoeft;Bruce D. McCandliss;Jessica M. Black;Alexander Gantman

  • Ameliorating Children’s Reading-Comprehension Difficulties A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Paula J. Clarke;Margaret J. Snowling;Emma Truelove;Charles Hulme

  • Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall.

    Ian Walker;Charles Hulme

  • Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure.

    Peter J. Hatcher;Charles Hulme;Margaret J. Snowling

  • Working Memory and Severe Learning Difficulties

    Charles Hulme;Susie Mackenzie

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret J. Snowling
Margaret J. Snowling University of Oxford
Arne Lervåg
Arne Lervåg University of Oslo
Gordon D. A. Brown
Gordon D. A. Brown University of Warwick
Monica Melby-Lervåg
Monica Melby-Lervåg University of Oslo
Kate Nation
Kate Nation University of Oxford
Steven Roodenrys
Steven Roodenrys University of Wollongong
Fumiko Hoeft
Fumiko Hoeft University of Connecticut
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
David R. Shanks
David R. Shanks University College London
Kristina Moll
Kristina Moll Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a wide range of career opportunities, from counseling and social work to research and organizational psychology. Many universities across the U.S. now offer flexible online programs, allowing students to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Before enrolling, it’s important to consider the popularity and reputation of programs in different regions. You can view the most popular psychology degree programs in Oklahoma to see which schools are attracting students and producing graduates that succeed in the workforce. Similarly, examining popular psychology programs in Orlando and the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Reno highlights trends in academic excellence and student support.

For those considering the Pacific Northwest, there are also several popular psychology programs in Seattle, often noted for innovation and strong networks with local employers. Researching these programs can help you match your professional ambitions with the right academic path, positioning you for long-term career growth in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Charles Hulme

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles