World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dorothy V. M. Bishop

Dorothy V. M. Bishop

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
132
Citations
62903
World Ranking
326
National Ranking
31

Psychology

D-Index
133
Citations
64898
World Ranking
154
National Ranking
27

Dorothy V. M. Bishop publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorothy V. M. Bishop sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 432 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dorothy V. M. Bishop D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorothy V. M. Bishop sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 133 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2014 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Overview

Dorothy V. M. Bishop is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Neuroscience, with a strong emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. Additional areas of study include Genetics, Statistics and Probability, and related aspects of uncertainty in statistical analysis.

Their research topics cover several specialized subjects, including:

  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Dorothy V. M. Bishop has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed journals and research venues. The most frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
  • Royal Society Open Science

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Dorothy V. M. Bishop include:

  • "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior," 2021, PLoS Biology
  • "Laterality indices consensus initiative (LICI): A Delphi expert survey report on recommendations to record, assess, and report asymmetry in human behavioural and brain research," 2023, Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
  • "How scientists can stop fooling themselves over statistics," 2020, Nature
  • "An updated investigation of the multidimensional structure of language lateralization in left- and right-handed adults: a test-retest functional transcranial Doppler sonography study with six language tasks," 2021, Royal Society Open Science
  • "Assessing the reliability of an online behavioural laterality battery: A pre-registered study," 2020, Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition

They have collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Paul A. Thompson (13 collaborations)
  • Zoe Woodhead (12 collaborations)
  • Kate E. Watkins (9 collaborations)
  • Dianne F. Newbury (7 collaborations)
  • Adam J. Parker (6 collaborations)

Dorothy V. M. Bishop was recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society in the United Kingdom in 2014, reflecting their standing in the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • A manifesto for reproducible science

    Marcus R. Munafò;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek;Dorothy V.M. Bishop;Katherine S. Button

  • Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different?

    Dorothy V. M. Bishop;Margaret J. Snowling

  • Uncommon Understanding (Classic Edition) : Development and disorders of language comprehension in children

    Dorothy V. M. Bishop

  • A Prospective Study of the Relationship between Specific Language Impairment, Phonological Disorders and Reading Retardation

    Dorothy Bishop;Catherine Adams

  • Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology

    Dorothy V.M. Bishop;Margaret J. Snowling;Paul A. Thompson;Trisha Greenhalgh

  • Language-impaired preschoolers: a follow-up into adolescence.

    Susan E. Stothard;Margaret J. Snowling;D. V. M. Bishop;Barry B. Chipchase

  • Language-impaired 4-year-olds: distinguishing transient from persistent impairment.

    Dorothy V. Bishop;A. Edmundson

  • Nonword Repetition as a Behavioural Marker for Inherited Language Impairment: Evidence From a Twin Study

    D. V. M. Bishop;T. North;C. Donlan

  • Development of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC): a method for assessing qualitative aspects of communicative impairment in children.

    D. V. M. Bishop

  • Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children

    Dorothy V.M. Bishop

  • CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children.

    Dorothy V. M. Bishop;Margaret J. Snowling;Paul A. Thompson;Trisha Greenhalgh

  • Evidence from Turner's syndrome of an imprinted X-linked locus affecting cognitive function

    D.H. Skuse;R.S. James;D.V.M. Bishop;B. Coppin

  • The Underlying Nature of Specific Language Impairment

    Dorothy V. Bishop

  • A practical guide to the selection of independent components of the electroencephalogram for artifact correction

    Maximilien Chaumon;Dorothy V.M. Bishop;Niko A. Busch

  • Relations Among Speech, Language, and Reading Disorders

    Bruce F. Pennington;Dorothy V. M. Bishop

  • Is preschool language impairment a risk factor for dyslexia in adolescence

    Margaret J. Snowling;D. V. M. Bishop;Susan E. Stothard

  • Narrative skills of children with communication impairments.

    Courtenay Frazier Norbury;Dorothy V. M. Bishop

  • Phonological awareness and literacy development in children with expressive phonological impairments

    J. Bird;D. V. M. Bishop;N. H. Freeman

  • Exploring the borderlands of autistic disorder and specific language impairment: a study using standardised diagnostic instruments.

    Dorothy V. M. Bishop;Courtenay Frazier Norbury

  • GENETIC-BASIS OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT - EVIDENCE FROM A TWIN STUDY

    D. V. M. Bishop;T. North;C. Donlan

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Courtenay Frazier Norbury
Courtenay Frazier Norbury University College London
Andrew J. O. Whitehouse
Andrew J. O. Whitehouse Telethon Kids Institute
Margaret J. Snowling
Margaret J. Snowling University of Oxford
Kate E. Watkins
Kate E. Watkins University of Oxford
Genevieve McArthur
Genevieve McArthur Macquarie University
Philip S. Dale
Philip S. Dale University of New Mexico
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Kate Nation
Kate Nation University of Oxford
Joachim Hallmayer
Joachim Hallmayer Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degree programs across the United States can open many doors for students seeking flexibility and quality education. From undergraduate to graduate degrees, there are options for every career stage. Students can review the best online psychology degree rankings in USA to find top national programs that suit their goals.

Regional rankings also play an important role when choosing a school. For those interested in the Southwest, the best online psychology degree rankings in Texas highlight leading institutions in that area. In the Midwest, students can reference the best online psychology degree rankings in Wisconsin for local opportunities.

Studying psychology online builds critical skills for diverse career paths in counseling, social work, education, or research. Those aiming for in-person programs, particularly in the Northeast, may also consider the top psychology programs in Albany for an exceptional educational experience. No matter the pathway, online and campus-based programs both lay a strong foundation for future professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Dorothy V. M. Bishop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles