World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
28958
World Ranking
4690
National Ranking
2599

Daniel K. Mroczek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel K. Mroczek sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 216 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel K. Mroczek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel K. Mroczek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel K. Mroczek is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans psychology and medicine, with particular emphasis on clinical psychology, health, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and neuropsychology and physiological psychology.

Their scholarly contributions encompass a wide array of topics in the psychological and medical sciences. Key areas of focus include:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Psychological well-being and life satisfaction
  • Personality traits and psychology
  • Mental health research topics
  • Aging and gerontology research
  • Optimism, hope, and well-being
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research

Recent publications by Daniel K. Mroczek cover significant studies in personality and health psychology, including:

  • "Trajectories of Big Five Personality Traits: A Coordinated Analysis of 16 Longitudinal Samples" (2020, European Journal of Personality)
  • "Is Healthy Neuroticism Associated with Health Behaviors? A Coordinated Integrative Data Analysis" (2020, Collabra Psychology)
  • "Associations Between Personality Traits and Cognitive Resilience in Older Adults" (2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B)
  • "Being Happy and Becoming Happier as Independent Predictors of Physical Health and Mortality" (2020, Psychosomatic Medicine)
  • "Is Healthy Neuroticism Associated with Chronic Conditions? A Coordinated Integrative Data Analysis" (2020, Collabra Psychology)

Mroczek frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Among their most frequent coauthors are:

  • Eileen K Graham
  • Emily C Willroth (39 collaborations)
  • Jing Luo (21 collaborations)
  • Tomiko Yoneda (18 collaborations)
  • Avron Spiro (17 collaborations)

Their research has been disseminated in several prominent venues, including:

  • Innovation in Aging (27 publications)
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (10 publications)
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (5 publications)
  • European Journal of Personality (4 publications)
  • Collabra Psychology (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress.

    R C Kessler;G Andrews;L J Colpe;E Hiripi

  • The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview short-form (CIDI-SF)

    Ronald C. Kessler;Gavin Andrews;Daniel Mroczek;Bedirhan Ustun

  • The effect of age on positive and negative affect : a developmental perspective on happiness

    Daniel K. Mroczek;Christian M. Kolarz

  • Personality Trait Change in Adulthood

    Brent W. Roberts;Daniel Mroczek

  • Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study.

    Daniel K. Mroczek;Avron Spiro Iii

  • The Effect of Daily Stress, Personality, and Age on Daily Negative Affect

    Daniel K. Mroczek;David M. Almeida

  • Modeling intraindividual change in personality traits: findings from the normative aging study.

    Daniel K. Mroczek;Avron Spiro

  • Final Versions of our Non-Specific Psychological Distress Scale

    R Kessler;D Mroczek

  • Personality Change Influences Mortality in Older Men

    Daniel K. Mroczek;Avron Spiro

  • Ambivalent Relationship Qualities Between Adults and Their Parents: Implications for the Well-Being of Both Parties

    Karen L. Fingerman;Lindsay Pitzer;Eva S. Lefkowitz;Kira S. Birditt

  • Personality Trait Level and Change as Predictors of Health Outcomes: Findings From a National Study of Americans (MIDUS)

    Nicholas A. Turiano;Lindsay Pitzer;Cherie Armour;Arun Karlamangla

  • Handbook of personality development

    Daniel K. Mroczek;Todd D. Little

  • Construct validation of optimism and pessimism in older men: Findings from the normative aging study.

    Daniel K. Mroczek;Avron Spiro;Avron Spiro;Carolyn M. Aldwin;Daniel J. Ozer

  • Personality and Substance Use in Midlife: Conscientiousness as a Moderator and the Effects of Trait Change.

    Nicholas A. Turiano;Shawn D. Whiteman;Sarah E. Hampson;Brent W. Roberts

  • Age and Emotion in Adulthood

    Daniel K. Mroczek

  • The development and implications of peer emotional support for student service members/veterans and civilian college students.

    Shawn D. Whiteman;Adam E. Barry;Daniel K. Mroczek;Shelley MacDermid Wadsworth

  • Personality predicts mortality risk: An integrative data analysis of 15 international longitudinal studies

    Eileen Kranz Graham;Joshua P. Rutsohn;Nicholas A. Turiano;Rebecca Bendayan

  • Big 5 personality traits and interleukin-6: evidence for "healthy Neuroticism" in a US population sample.

    Nicholas A. Turiano;Daniel K. Mroczek;Jan Moynihan;Benjamin P. Chapman

  • Emotional Reactivity and Mortality: Longitudinal Findings From the VA Normative Aging Study

    Daniel K. Mroczek;Daniel K. Mroczek;Robert S. Stawski;Nicholas A. Turiano;Wai Chan

  • Additive contributions of childhood adversity and recent stressors to inflammation at midlife: Findings from the MIDUS study

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Margie E. Lachman;Daniel K. Mroczek;Teresa E. Seeman

  • Daily stressors and memory failures in a naturalistic setting: findings from the VA Normative Aging Study.

    Shevaun D. Neupert;David M. Almeida;Daniel K. Mroczek;Avron Spiro

  • Personality reconsidered: A new agenda for aging research. Commentaries. Authors' reply

    Karen Hooker;Dan P. Mcadams;Daniel K. Mroczek;Avron Spiro

Frequent Co-Authors

Avron Spiro
Avron Spiro Boston University
Nicholas A. Turiano
Nicholas A. Turiano West Virginia University
Todd D. Little
Todd D. Little Texas Tech University
Scott M. Hofer
Scott M. Hofer University of Victoria
Patrick L. Hill
Patrick L. Hill Washington University in St. Louis
Andrea M. Piccinin
Andrea M. Piccinin University of Victoria
David M. Almeida
David M. Almeida Pennsylvania State University
Denis Gerstorf
Denis Gerstorf Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Carolyn M. Aldwin
Carolyn M. Aldwin Oregon State University
Mindy J. Katz
Mindy J. Katz Albert Einstein College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to flexible and accelerated educational opportunities. Many students opt for accelerated online psychology doctorate degrees in Virginia to fast-track their entry into advanced clinical and academic careers. These programs are designed for working professionals who want to earn a doctorate without putting their lives on hold.

If you’re not ready for a doctoral program, a accelerated online psychology master's program in Virginia can provide advanced knowledge and practical skills in a shorter time, helping students gain a competitive edge for roles such as counselors or organizational consultants.

Many states offer tailored options. Students looking for flexibility can consider the accelerated online psychology programs in Texas or the fastest online psychology programs in Washington. These regional programs let you complete your degree quickly while networking locally.

Choosing an online psychology degree can lead to careers in education, healthcare, business, or counseling. The versatility of these programs ensures you can start or advance your career on your own schedule while building critical skills for a dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel K. Mroczek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles