World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 69 2376 2169 112 108 247 16865

Jonathan Mond publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Mond between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Mond published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2016. 6 of the 260 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2016. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
2003 2025

260 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Mond: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 11
2005 3
2006 7
2007 10
2008 5
2009 7
2010 9
2011 11
2012 8
2013 13
2014 16
2015 18
2016 26
2017 14
2018 23
2019 25
2020 19
2021 18
2022 4
2023 5
2024 3
2025 3
Total 260
Download as CSV

Jonathan Mond publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Mond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 247 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 247
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Mond D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Mond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 69
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan Mond is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and health professions, with notable specialization in clinical psychology and general health professions. Their work encompasses a range of topics, including eating disorders and behaviors, obesity, physical activity, diet, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, community health and development, health policy implementation science, and migration, health, and trauma.

The scientist has contributed extensively to research published in several key academic journals. Frequent publication venues for their work include the International Journal of Eating Disorders, the Journal of Mental Health, the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Eating Behaviors, and Early Intervention in Psychiatry.

Jonathan Mond has co-authored research repeatedly with several colleagues including Deborah Mitchison, Kay Bussey, Nora Trompeter, Phillipa Hay, and Alexandra Lonergan. Collaborative efforts with these co-authors have contributed to advancing knowledge in their fields of study.

Recent notable papers by Jonathan Mond include:

  • Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes (2020) published in BMC Psychiatry
  • Protect me from my selfie: Examining the association between photo-based social media behaviors and self-reported eating disorders in adolescence (2020) published in International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Eating disorders "mental health literacy": a scoping review (2020) published in Journal of Mental Health
  • Prevalence of muscle dysmorphia in adolescents: findings from the EveryBODY study (2021) published in Psychological Medicine
  • Factors Shaping the Lived Experience of Resettlement for Former Refugees in Regional Australia (2020) published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • Validity of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in screening for eating disorders in community samples

    Jonathan Mond;Phillipa J Hay;Bryan Rodgers;Cathy Owen

  • Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q): Norms for young adult women

    Jonathan Matthew. Mond;P. J. Hay;Bryan. Rodgers;C. Owen

  • The enigma of male eating disorders: a critical review and synthesis

    Stuart B. Murray;Jason M. Nagata;Scott Griffiths;Jerel P. Calzo

  • The link between body dissatisfaction and self-esteem in adolescents: Similarities across gender, age, weight status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status

    Patricia A. Van Den Berg;Jonathan Mond;Marla E Eisenberg;Diann Ackard

  • Eating disorder behaviors are increasing : findings from two sequential community surveys in South Australia

    Phillipa J. Hay;Jonathan Mond;Petra Buttner;Anita Darby

  • Obesity, Body Dissatisfaction, and Emotional Well-Being in Early and Late Adolescence: Findings From the Project EAT Study

    Jonathan Mond;Patricia Van Den Berg;Kerri Boutelle;Peter Hannan

  • Development and Psychometric Validation of the EDE-QS, a 12 Item Short Form of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)

    Nicole Gideon;Nick Hawkes;Jonathan Mond;Jonathan Mond;Rob Saunders

  • Screening for eating disorders in primary care : EDE-Q versus SCOFF

    Jonathan M. Mond;Tricia C. Myers;Ross D. Crosby;Phillipa J. Hay

  • Temporal stability of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire.

    Jonathan M. Mond;Phillipa J. Hay;Bryan Rodgers;Cathy Owen

  • The changing demographic profile of eating disorder behaviors in the community

    Deborah Mitchison;Phillipa Hay;Phillipa Hay;Shameran Slewa-Younan;Jonathan Mond;Jonathan Mond;Jonathan Mond

  • Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of DSM-5 eating disorders in the Australian population

    Phillipa Hay;Federico Girosi;Jonathan Mond

  • Quality of life impairment associated with body dissatisfaction in a general population sample of women

    Jonathan Mond;Deborah Mitchison;Janet D Latner;Phillipa Hay;Phillipa Hay

  • Epidemiology of eating disorders, eating disordered behaviour, and body image disturbance in males: a narrative review

    Deborah Mitchison;Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan Mond

  • An update on the definition of excessive exercise in eating disorders research

    Jonathan M. Mond;Phillipa J. Hay;Bryan Rodgers;Cathy Owen

  • Sex differences in the relationships between body dissatisfaction, quality of life and psychological distress

    Scott Griffiths;Scott Griffiths;Phillipa Hay;Deborah Mitchison;Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan M. Mond;Jonathan M. Mond

  • Evolving eating disorder psychopathology: conceptualising muscularity-oriented disordered eating.

    Stuart B. Murray;Scott Griffiths;Jonathan M. Mond

  • Assessing quality of life in eating disorder patients.

    Jonathan Mond;Phillipa J Hay;Bryan Rodgers;Cathy Owen

  • Health service utilization for eating disorders: Findings from a community‐based study

    Jonathan M. Mond;Phillipa J. Hay;Bryan Rodgers;Cathy Owen

  • DSM-5 full syndrome, other specified, and unspecified eating disorders in Australian adolescents: prevalence and clinical significance

    Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan Mond;Kay Bussey;Scott Griffiths

  • The loss of control over eating scale: Development and psychometric evaluation

    Janet D. Latner;Jonathan M. Mond;Jonathan M. Mond;Mackenzie C. Kelly;Stephen N. Haynes

  • Me, my selfie, and I: The relationship between editing and posting selfies and body dissatisfaction in men and women

    Alexandra Rhodes Lonergan;Kay Bussey;Jonathan Mond;Olivia Brown

  • The rising prevalence of comorbid obesity and eating disorder behaviors from 1995 to 2005

    Anita Darby;Phillipa Hay;Jonathan Mond;Frances Quirk

  • Excessive Exercise in Eating Disorder Patients and in Healthy Women

    Jonathan M. Mond;Rachel M. Calogero

Frequent Co-Authors

Phillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay Western Sydney University
Deborah Mitchison
Deborah Mitchison University of Technology Sydney
Bryan Rodgers
Bryan Rodgers Australian National University
Scott Griffiths
Scott Griffiths University of Melbourne
Stuart B. Murray
Stuart B. Murray University of California, Los Angeles
Ian D. Stephen
Ian D. Stephen Bournemouth University
Susan J. Paxton
Susan J. Paxton La Trobe University
Janet D. Latner
Janet D. Latner University of Hawaii at Manoa
Stephen Touyz
Stephen Touyz University of Sydney
Richard J. Stevenson
Richard J. Stevenson Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering advancing your career in psychology? There are many pathways, and choosing the right online degree is crucial. While doctoral training is a common step for those aiming to become practicing psychologists, affordability is a concern for many. Fortunately, some of the cheapest psyd programs online make earning this advanced credential more accessible than ever.

If your interests lie in law and public safety, you might explore jobs in criminal psychology. This growing field blends psychology and criminal justice, opening doors to careers in corrections, forensic assessment, and law enforcement agencies.

Not sure whether to pursue a social work, counseling, or psychology degree? It’s important to understand which is better msw or masters in counseling. Each offers unique roles, career prospects, and licensure pathways in mental health and human services.

If time or academic rigor is a concern, a number of easy psychology degrees online provide flexible routes to learn key concepts without overwhelming coursework. No matter which pathway you select, online study in psychology offers flexibility, career options, and real-world impact.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Mond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles