World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
10930
World Ranking
4609
National Ranking
2561

Stuart B. Murray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart B. Murray sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stuart B. Murray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart B. Murray sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart B. Murray is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a notable emphasis on clinical psychology as well as public health, environmental and occupational health, sociology and political science, pharmacy, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics addressed in Murray's work include eating disorders and behaviors, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, obesity, physical activity and diet, body image and dysmorphia studies, obesity and health practices, the impact of technology on adolescents, and LGBTQ health, identity, and policy.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Jason M. Nagata
  • Kyle T. Ganson
  • Emilio J. Compte
  • Rachel F. Rodgers
  • Tiffany A. Brown

Murray has published extensively across several journals specializing in topics relevant to their fields of study. These venues include:

  • Body Image
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Eating Disorders
  • Eating Behaviors

Recent selected publications exemplifying their research focus are:

  • "Eating disorders in adolescent boys and young men: an update", 2020, Current Opinion in Pediatrics
  • "Community norms for the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) among transgender men and women", 2020, Eating Behaviors
  • "Protect me from my selfie: Examining the association between photo-based social media behaviors and self-reported eating disorders in adolescence", 2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Prevalence and correlates of muscle-enhancing behaviors among adolescents and young adults in the United States", 2020, International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health
  • "Sociodemographic Correlates of Contemporary Screen Time Use among 9- and 10-Year-Old Children", 2021, The Journal of Pediatrics

In addition to journal articles, Murray has contributed to book publications, including the title "Medical Humanities and Disability Studies" published in 2023 under Bloomsbury Academic eBooks.

Best Publications

  • The enigma of male eating disorders: a critical review and synthesis

    Stuart B. Murray;Jason M. Nagata;Scott Griffiths;Jerel P. Calzo

  • A comparison of eating, exercise, shape, and weight related symptomatology in males with muscle dysmorphia and anorexia nervosa.

    Stuart B. Murray;Elizabeth Rieger;Tom Hildebrandt;Lisa Karlov

  • Men, Muscles, and Eating Disorders: an Overview of Traditional and Muscularity-Oriented Disordered Eating.

    Jason M. Lavender;Tiffany A. Brown;Stuart B. Murray

  • Muscle dysmorphia and the DSM-V conundrum: Where does it belong? A review paper

    Stuart B Murray;Elizabeth Rieger;Stephen W Touyz;Yolanda De la Garza Garcia

  • Evolving eating disorder psychopathology: conceptualising muscularity-oriented disordered eating.

    Stuart B. Murray;Scott Griffiths;Jonathan M. Mond

  • Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Stuart B Murray;Daniel S Quintana;Katharine L Loeb;Scott Griffiths

  • The Contribution of Social Media to Body Dissatisfaction, Eating Disorder Symptoms, and Anabolic Steroid Use Among Sexual Minority Men.

    Scott Griffiths;Stuart B. Murray;Isabel Krug;Siân A. McLean

  • DSM-5 full syndrome, other specified, and unspecified eating disorders in Australian adolescents: prevalence and clinical significance

    Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan Mond;Kay Bussey;Scott Griffiths

  • Prevalence and Correlates of Disordered Eating Behaviors Among Young Adults with Overweight or Obesity

    Jason M. Nagata;Andrea K. Garber;Jennifer L. Tabler;Stuart B. Murray

  • Extending the Masculinity Hypothesis: An Investigation of Gender Role Conformity, Body Dissatisfaction, and Disordered Eating in Young Heterosexual Men

    Scott Griffiths;Stuart B. Murray;Stephen Touyz

  • Me, my selfie, and I: The relationship between editing and posting selfies and body dissatisfaction in men and women

    Alexandra Rhodes Lonergan;Kay Bussey;Jonathan Mond;Olivia Brown

  • Disentangling body image: The relative associations of overvaluation, dissatisfaction, and preoccupation with psychological distress and eating disorder behaviors in male and female adolescents.

    Deborah Mitchison;Phillipa J Hay;Scott Griffiths;Stuart Benjamin Murray

  • Eating disorders in adolescent boys and young men: an update.

    Jason M Nagata;Kyle T Ganson;Kyle T Ganson;Stuart B Murray

  • Eating Disorders in Males

    Unknown

  • Muscle Dysmorphia Symptomatology and Associated Psychological Features in Bodybuilders and Non-Bodybuilder Resistance Trainers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Lachlan Mitchell;Stuart B. Murray;Stephen Cobley;Daniel Hackett

  • Self-stigma of seeking treatment and being male predict an increased likelihood of having an undiagnosed eating disorder

    Scott Griffiths;Scott Griffiths;Jonathan M. Mond;Zhicheng Li;Sanduni Gunatilake

  • The prevalence and adverse associations of stigmatization in people with eating disorders

    Scott Griffiths;Jonathan M. Mond;Stuart B. Murray;Stephen Touyz

  • Male clinical norms and sex differences on the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) and Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q).

    Kathryn E. Smith;Tyler B. Mason;Stuart Benjamin Murray;Scott Griffiths

  • Anabolic steroid use and body image psychopathology in men: Delineating between appearance- versus performance-driven motivations.

    Stuart B. Murray;Scott Griffiths;Jonathan M. Mond;Joseph Kean

  • Community norms for the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) among transgender men and women

    Jason M. Nagata;Stuart B. Murray;Emilio J. Compte;Erica H. Pak

  • Disordered eating and the muscular ideal

    Scott Griffiths;Stuart B Murray;Stephen Touyz

  • Sex Differences in Quality of Life Impairment Associated With Body Dissatisfaction in Adolescents

    Scott Griffiths;Scott Griffiths;Scott Griffiths;Stuart Benjamin Murray;Caroline Bentley;Kassandra Gratwick-Sarll

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott Griffiths
Scott Griffiths University of Melbourne
Jonathan Mond
Jonathan Mond University of Tasmania
Deborah Mitchison
Deborah Mitchison University of Technology Sydney
Stephen Touyz
Stephen Touyz University of Sydney
Daniel Le Grange
Daniel Le Grange University of California, San Francisco
Aaron J. Blashill
Aaron J. Blashill San Diego State University
Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo
Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo University of California, San Francisco
Walter H. Kaye
Walter H. Kaye University of California, San Diego
Phillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay Western Sydney University
Kay Bussey
Kay Bussey Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online education options and career pathways, especially in the field of social work. Many psychology graduates transition into social work roles, often requiring further specialized training or licensure, depending on the state where they plan to practice.

Each state has unique educational and licensing requirements. For example, you can learn about Mississippi social work education requirements to understand what degrees and supervised experience are expected. If you’re interested in the Midwest, you’ll want to review the steps for becoming a social worker in Missouri or explore how to start becoming a social worker in Montana.

In Nebraska, the path to licensure is distinct. Review the Nebraska social work license requirements to see specific educational, exam, and fieldwork standards.

Online psychology degrees can help students meet these diverse requirements, offering flexibility and accessibility. Carefully research state guidelines to make sure your chosen program aligns with your career goals in social work or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart B. Murray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles