World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7112 6629 417 407 218 12749

Kay Bussey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kay Bussey between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kay Bussey published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2021. 18 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2021. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 11 publications
1975 2025

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kay Bussey: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 1
1977 3
1978 2
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 2
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 5
1993 3
1994 1
1995 3
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 3
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 0
2007 4
2008 5
2009 6
2010 4
2011 10
2012 3
2013 7
2014 17
2015 15
2016 14
2017 8
2018 7
2019 11
2020 16
2021 20
2022 14
2023 9
2024 7
2025 11
Total 237
Download as CSV

Kay Bussey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay Bussey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 218 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 218
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kay Bussey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay Bussey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kay Bussey is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and social sciences. Their work primarily addresses clinical psychology with notable intersections in social psychology, gender studies, sociology, political science, and education.

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Bussey's recent publications cover a range of subjects within these fields. Examples include:

  • "Protect me from my selfie: Examining the association between photo-based social media behaviors and self-reported eating disorders in adolescence" (2020), published in International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "The Impact of Teasing and Bullying Victimization on Disordered Eating and Body Image Disturbance Among Adolescents: A Systematic Review" (2021), published in Trauma Violence & Abuse
  • "The role of self-efficacy in defending cyberbullying victims" (2020), published in Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Prevalence of muscle dysmorphia in adolescents: findings from the EveryBODY study" (2021), published in Psychological Medicine
  • "Emotion Dysregulation within the CBT-E Model of Eating Disorders: A Narrative Review" (2021), published in Cognitive Therapy and Research

Their publication record demonstrates a consistent presence in specific journals, including:

  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Nutrients
  • Journal of School Violence
  • International Journal of Bullying Prevention

Frequent collaborators in Bussey's research include:

  • Deborah Mitchison
  • Nora Trompeter
  • Phillipa Hay
  • Alexandra Lonergan
  • Jonathan Mond

This collaboration network and diverse range of publication venues indicate Bussey's involvement in multidisciplinary investigations around adolescent mental health, disordered eating, bullying, and related psychosocial issues.

Best Publications

  • Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.

    Kay Bussey;Albert Bandura

  • Influence of gender constancy and social power on sex-linked modeling.

    Kay Bussey;Albert Bandura

  • The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well.

    David G. Perry;Kay Bussey

  • Self-regulatory mechanisms governing gender development.

    Kay Bussey;Albert Bandura

  • Children's categorization and evaluation of different types of lies and truths

    Kay Bussey

  • Lying and Truthfulness: Children's Definitions, Standards, and Evaluative Reactions

    Kay Bussey

  • On broadening the cognitive, motivational, and sociostructural scope of theorizing about gender development and functioning: comment on Martin, Ruble, and Szkrybalo (2002).

    Albert Bandura;Kay Bussey

  • Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors

    Kirstin Barchia;Kay Bussey

  • The Role of Moral Disengagement and Self-Efficacy in Cyberbullying

    Kay Bussey;Sally Fitzpatrick;Amrutha Raman

  • DSM-5 full syndrome, other specified, and unspecified eating disorders in Australian adolescents: prevalence and clinical significance

    Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan Mond;Kay Bussey;Scott Griffiths

  • Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: Exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy

    Kirstin Barchia;Kay Bussey

  • The role of individual and collective moral disengagement in peer aggression and bystanding: A multilevel analysis.

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli;Kay Bussey

  • Gender identity development

    Kay Bussey

  • A meta-analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth

    Brittany Killer;Kay Bussey;David J Hawes;Caroline Hunt

  • Me, my selfie, and I: The relationship between editing and posting selfies and body dissatisfaction in men and women

    Alexandra Rhodes Lonergan;Kay Bussey;Jonathan Mond;Olivia Brown

  • Gender Differences in Moral Reasoning

    Kay Bussey;Betty Maughan

  • Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses' responses to cyberbullying

    Kimberley R. Allison;Kay Bussey

  • Same-sex imitation: The avoidance of cross-sex models or the acceptance of same-sex models?

    Kay Bussey;David G. Perry

  • The psychological impact of peer victimization: exploring social-cognitive mediators of depression.

    Kirstin Barchia;Kay Bussey

  • Fathers as 'core business' in child welfare practice and research : an interdisciplinary review

    Lee Zanoni;Wayne Warburton;Kay Bussey;Anne McMaugh

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah Mitchison
Deborah Mitchison University of Technology Sydney
Phillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay Western Sydney University
Jonathan Mond
Jonathan Mond University of Tasmania
Scott Griffiths
Scott Griffiths University of Melbourne
David G. Perry
David G. Perry Florida Atlantic University
Stuart B. Murray
Stuart B. Murray University of California, Los Angeles
Ronald M. Rapee
Ronald M. Rapee Macquarie University
Albert Bandura
Albert Bandura Stanford University
Gianluca Gini
Gianluca Gini University of Padua
Tiziana Pozzoli
Tiziana Pozzoli University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring advanced psychology studies online opens up diverse and flexible career opportunities. Many students consider pursuing forensic psychology phd programs online to specialize in criminal justice and legal systems, opening doors in correctional institutions, law enforcement, or expert testimony roles.

For those interested in helping children and adolescents thrive in educational environments, school psychology programs online accredited by nasp prepare graduates for licensure and impactful careers within K-12 school settings.

If you’re seeking efficient career advancement or a foundation for further graduate education, choosing a 1 year psychology degree online can be a smart way to quickly gain relevant skills and credentials. This path is especially appealing for working professionals or those seeking to pivot within the mental health field.

Finally, applied behavior analysis is a rapidly growing area for those wishing to make a difference with populations such as individuals with autism. Earning an applied behavior analysis degree online prepares graduates for certification and practitioner roles, supporting positive behavioral changes in clinical, educational, or community settings.

Best Scientists Citing Kay Bussey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles