World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tiziana Pozzoli

Tiziana Pozzoli

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10393 9728 239 235 78 6976

Tiziana Pozzoli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tiziana Pozzoli between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tiziana Pozzoli published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2014. 5 of the 85 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2014. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

85 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tiziana Pozzoli: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 0
2008 2
2009 4
2010 3
2011 5
2012 5
2013 6
2014 9
2015 9
2016 2
2017 5
2018 3
2019 4
2020 4
2021 5
2022 4
2023 2
2024 6
2025 4
2026 1
Total 85
Download as CSV

Tiziana Pozzoli publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiziana Pozzoli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 78
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tiziana Pozzoli D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiziana Pozzoli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tiziana Pozzoli is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy and focuses on research within the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their work is particularly concentrated in the areas of social psychology, clinical psychology, and safety research, with additional contributions in experimental and cognitive psychology and education.

Their research topics include:

  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology

Recent publications reflect these research interests, highlighting longitudinal studies on bullying and social status among students, as well as investigations into moral aspects of peer aggression and defending behavior. Significant papers include:

  • "Effects of Socioeconomic Status, Parental Stress, and Family Support on Children's Physical and Emotional Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2022) in the Journal of Child and Family Studies
  • "Defending or Remaining Passive as a Bystander of School Bullying in Sweden: The Role of Moral Disengagement and Antibullying Class Norms" (2021) in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • "Longitudinal Relations between Students' Social Status and Their Roles in Bullying: The Mediating Role of Self-Perceived Social Status" (2020) in the Journal of School Violence
  • "Longitudinal Links of Individual and Collective Morality with Adolescents' Peer Aggression" (2021) in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Longitudinal associations of social-cognitive and moral correlates with defending in bullying" (2022) in the Journal of School Psychology

Frequent publication venues for Pozzoli's work include:

  • Journal of School Psychology
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Child and Family Studies

Collaborations are a notable part of Pozzoli's research activities, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Gianluca Gini
  • Robert Thornberg
  • Federica Angelini
  • Björn Sjögren
  • Sergio Agnoli

Best Publications

  • Association Between Bullying and Psychosomatic Problems: A Meta-analysis

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli

  • Moral disengagement among children and youth: a meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli;Shelley Hymel

  • Bullied Children and Psychosomatic Problems: A Meta-analysis

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli

  • Active Defending and Passive Bystanding Behavior in Bullying: The Role of Personal Characteristics and Perceived Peer Pressure

    Tiziana Pozzoli;Gianluca Gini

  • The role of bystanders in students' perception of bullying and sense of safety.

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli;Francesco Borghi;Lara Franzoni

  • The Role of Individual Correlates and Class Norms in Defending and Passive Bystanding Behavior in Bullying: A Multilevel Analysis

    Tiziana Pozzoli;Gianluca Gini;Alessio Vieno

  • Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli;Marc Hauser

  • Why Do Bystanders of Bullying Help or Not? A Multidimensional Model.

    Tiziana Pozzoli;Gianluca Gini

  • The role of individual and collective moral disengagement in peer aggression and bystanding: A multilevel analysis.

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli;Kay Bussey

  • Individual and Class Moral Disengagement in Bullying Among Elementary School Children

    Tiziana Pozzoli;Gianluca Gini;Alessio Vieno

  • The Role of Masculinity in Children’s Bullying

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli

  • A meta-analysis of the differential relations of traditional and cyber-victimization with internalizing problems.

    Gianluca Gini;Noel A. Card;Tiziana Pozzoli

  • Main and Moderated Effects of Moral Cognition and Status on Bullying and Defending

    Simona Carla Silvia Caravita;Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli

  • Bullying Victimization at School and Headache: A Meta‐Analysis of Observational Studies

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli;Michela Lenzi;Alessio Vieno

  • The interaction between emotional intelligence and cognitive ability in predicting scholastic performance in school-aged children.

    Sergio Agnoli;Giacomo Mancini;Tiziana Pozzoli;Bruno Baldaro

  • Unique and Interactive Effects of Moral Emotions and Moral Disengagement on Bullying and Defending among School Children

    Robert Thornberg;Tiziana Pozzoli;Gianluca Gini;Tomas Jungert

  • Bystanders' Reactions to Bullying: A Cross‐cultural Analysis of Personal Correlates Among Italian and Singaporean Students

    Tiziana Pozzoli;Rebecca P. Ang;Gianluca Gini

  • Bullying and defending behavior : The role of explicit and implicit moral cognition

    Tiziana Pozzoli;Gianluca Gini;Robert Thornberg

  • Collective moral disengagement: Initial validation of a scale for adolescents

    Gianluca Gini;Tiziana Pozzoli;Kay Bussey

  • Associations between peer victimization, perceived teacher unfairness, and adolescents' adjustment and well-being

    Gianluca Gini;Claudia Marino;Tiziana Pozzoli;Melissa Holt

  • Cybervictimization and somatic and psychological symptoms among Italian middle school students

    Alessio Vieno;Gianluca Gini;Michela Lenzi;Tiziana Pozzoli

Frequent Co-Authors

Gianluca Gini
Gianluca Gini University of Padua
Robert Thornberg
Robert Thornberg Linköping University
Alessio Vieno
Alessio Vieno University of Padua
Kay Bussey
Kay Bussey Macquarie University
Jun Sung Hong
Jun Sung Hong Wayne State University
Frank J. Elgar
Frank J. Elgar McGill University
Melissa K. Holt
Melissa K. Holt Boston University
Noel A. Card
Noel A. Card University of Georgia
Shelley Hymel
Shelley Hymel University of British Columbia
Michelle K. Demaray
Michelle K. Demaray Northern Illinois University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering studying Psychology in the USA, you might also be interested in related online degrees, such as Social Work. Many universities offer top social work degrees in Houston, designed to give students a strong foundation in helping individuals and communities. Exploring these pathways can open up rewarding career options in counseling, mental health services, and case management.

Regional offerings also provide unique opportunities. For example, the best social work degrees in Idaho are ideal for those seeking to work in rural or underserved areas, while the best social work degree programs in Jackson give students insight into serving diverse communities in Mississippi. Likewise, the best social work degrees in Louisiana focus on public service and practical fieldwork, preparing students for impactful roles after graduation.

With flexible online options, it’s easier than ever to tailor your education to fit your career goals and current lifestyle. Whether you aspire to clinical practice, advocacy, or community outreach, online degrees in Psychology and Social Work build versatile skills for a variety of meaningful career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Tiziana Pozzoli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles