World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6793 6329 3681 3344 116 20934

Noel A. Card publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Noel A. Card between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Noel A. Card published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2007. 2 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2007. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
2002 2025

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Noel A. Card: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 3
2004 1
2005 5
2006 7
2007 12
2008 8
2009 3
2010 10
2011 7
2012 6
2013 8
2014 6
2015 9
2016 7
2017 8
2018 5
2019 4
2020 1
2021 4
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 118
Download as CSV

Noel A. Card publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noel A. Card sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 116
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Noel A. Card D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noel A. Card sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Noel A. Card is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a focus on subfields including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science, as well as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their scholarly work addresses a range of topics, particularly in the areas of:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Early Childhood Education and Development

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • A meta-analysis of longitudinal peer influence effects in childhood and adolescence, 2021, Psychological Bulletin
  • Relational aggression and victimization during adolescence: A meta-analytic review of unique associations with popularity, peer acceptance, rejection, and friendship characteristics, 2020, Journal of Adolescence
  • A Dyadic Exploration of Marital Satisfaction as a Mediator between Religiosity and Depressive Symptoms, 2020, Marriage & Family Review
  • Relational sanctification, communal coping, and depression among African American couples, 2023, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
  • Perceived Mother and Father Parenting and Adolescent Social Anxiety Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis, 2025, Adolescent Research Review

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Noel A. Card include:

  • Andrew H. Rose
  • Matteo Giletta
  • Sophia Choukas-Bradley
  • Marlies Maes
  • Kathryn P. Linthicum

Their research has been published in several venues, with repeated contributions to journals such as:

  • Psychological Bulletin
  • Journal of Adolescence
  • Marriage & Family Review
  • Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
  • Adolescent Research Review

Noel A. Card's work addresses complex issues related to developmental psychology and family dynamics, often incorporating meta-analytic approaches to understand psychosocial processes and relationships across adolescence and adulthood.

Best Publications

  • Direct and Indirect Aggression During Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences, Intercorrelations, and Relations to Maladjustment

    Noel A. Card;Brian D. Stucky;Gita M. Sawalani;Todd D. Little

  • Best Practices for Missing Data Management in Counseling Psychology

    Gabriel L. Schlomer;Sheri Bauman;Noel A. Card

  • Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research

    Noel A. Card

  • Gender-nonconforming lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: School victimization and young adult psychosocial adjustment.

    Russell B. Toomey;Caitlin Ryan;Rafael M. Diaz;Noel A. Card

  • Financial Socialization of First-year College Students: The Roles of Parents, Work, and Education

    Soyeon Shim;Bonnie L. Barber;Noel A. Card;Jing Jian Xiao

  • Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment:

    Noel A. Card;Todd D. Little

  • New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data.

    Todd D. Little;Kristopher J. Preacher;James P. Selig;Noel A. Card

  • Peer Victimization Among Schoolchildren: Correlations, Causes, Consequences, and Considerations in Assessment and Intervention

    Noel A. Card;Ernest V. E. Hodges

  • A Non-arbitrary Method of Identifying and Scaling Latent Variables in SEM and MACS Models

    Todd D. Little;David W. Slegers;Noel A. Card

  • Structural Equation Modeling of Mediation and Moderation With Contextual Factors

    Todd D. Little;Noel A. Card;James A. Bovaird;Kristopher J. Preacher

  • Teen dating violence: a meta-analytic review of prevalence rates

    Katherine Wincentak;Jennifer Connolly;Noel Card

  • Gratitude and the Reduced Costs of Materialism in Adolescents

    Jeffrey J. Froh;Robert A. Emmons;Noel A. Card;Giacomo Bono

  • Handbook of developmental research methods

    Brett Paul Laursen;Todd D. Little;Noel A. Card

  • The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs: A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies.

    Elizabeth B Raposa;Jean Rhodes;Geert Jan J M Stams;Noel Card

  • The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills

    Patricia H. Hawley;Todd D. Little;Noel A. Card

  • Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies

    Todd D. Little;James A. Bovaird;Noel A. Card

  • Overt and Relational Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review of Their Overlap and Associations With Social-Psychological Adjustment.

    Deborah M. Casper;Noel A. Card

  • The Myth of the Alpha Male: A New Look at Dominance-Related Beliefs and Behaviors among Adolescent Males and Females.

    Patricia H. Hawley;Todd D. Little;Noel A. Card

  • A meta-analytic review of internalizing, externalizing, and academic adjustment among children of deployed military service members.

    Noel A. Card;Leslie Bosch;Deborah M. Casper;Christine Bracamonte Wiggs

  • A comparison of maternal sensitivity and verbal stimulation as unique predictors of infant social-emotional and cognitive development.

    Melissa Page;Mari S. Wilhelm;Wendy C. Gamble;Noel A. Card

Frequent Co-Authors

Todd D. Little
Todd D. Little Texas Tech University
Russell B. Toomey
Russell B. Toomey University of Arizona
Ernest V. E. Hodges
Ernest V. E. Hodges St. John's University
Sheri Bauman
Sheri Bauman University of Arizona
Soyeon Shim
Soyeon Shim University of Wisconsin–Madison
Joyce Serido
Joyce Serido University of Minnesota
Stephen T. Russell
Stephen T. Russell The University of Texas at Austin
Kristopher J. Preacher
Kristopher J. Preacher Vanderbilt University
Rafael M. Diaz
Rafael M. Diaz San Francisco State University
Bonnie L. Barber
Bonnie L. Barber Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in mental health counseling? Many students pursuing psychology in the USA are exploring online degree options and diverse career pathways. Online degrees in psychology and counseling enable flexibility and accessibility for individuals balancing studies, work, or family commitments.

Career opportunities often include roles such as mental health counselor, therapist, or behavioral specialist. Each city and state can have different requirements, which is why it is important to understand local guidelines. For example, San Antonio mental health counselor education requirements highlight the importance of obtaining a relevant master's degree, supervised clinical hours, and licensure.

If you plan to work in another city, it’s vital to be informed about regional differences. You can read more about mental health counselor requirements in San Diego, or explore the steps involved if you want to become a mental health counselor in San Francisco. For those interested in working in the Bay Area, take a closer look at what’s required to become a mental health counselor in San Jose.

Carefully reviewing these requirements will help you plan your educational journey and achieve your career goals in mental health counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Noel A. Card

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles