World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
9414
World Ranking
5733
National Ranking
2086

Mathew E. Maltrud publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew E. Maltrud sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Mathew E. Maltrud D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew E. Maltrud sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mathew E. Maltrud is affiliated with Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on several specialized subfields.

The main areas of study include:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Geology

Their work covers a range of topics related to atmospheric and environmental dynamics, climate modeling, and oceanographic processes. The key research topics can be summarized as follows:

  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics

Mathew E. Maltrud's recent publications illustrate engagement with Earth system modeling and biogeochemistry. Selected papers include:

  • The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation (2022), published in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • The DOE E3SM v1.1 Biogeochemistry Configuration: Description and Simulated Ecosystem-Climate Responses to Historical Changes in Forcing (2020), published in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Investigating controls on sea ice algal production using E3SMv1.1-BGC (2020), published in Annals of Glaciology
  • The fully coupled regionally refined model of E3SM version 2: overview of the atmosphere, land, and river results (2023), published in Geoscientific Model Development
  • The Influence of Ocean Topography on the Upwelling of Carbon in the Southern Ocean (2021), published in Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent coauthors contributing alongside Mathew E. Maltrud include:

  • Bryce E. Harrop
  • Susannah M. Burrows
  • L. Ruby Leung
  • Xiaoying Shi
  • Qi Tang

Their work has been published frequently in several venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Impact of partial steps and momentum advection schemes in a global ocean circulation model at eddy-permitting resolution

    Bernard Barnier;Gurvan Madec;Thierry Penduff;Jean-Marc Molines

  • The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution

    Jean Christophe Golaz;Peter M. Caldwell;Luke P. Van Roekel;Mark R. Petersen

  • Numerical Simulation of the North Atlantic Ocean at 1/10°

    Richard D. Smith;Mathew E. Maltrud;Frank O. Bryan;Matthew W. Hecht

  • A multi-resolution approach to global ocean modeling

    Todd Ringler;Mark Petersen;Robert L. Higdon;Doug Jacobsen

  • Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. III: Implementation and impact in global ocean climate simulations

    B. Fox-Kemper;B. Fox-Kemper;G. Danabasoglu;R. Ferrari;S.M. Griffies

  • An eddy resolving global 1/10° ocean simulation

    Mathew E Maltrud;Julie L McClean

  • Energy spectra and coherent structures in forced two-dimensional and beta-plane turbulence

    M. E. Maltrud;G. K. Vallis

  • The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation

    Unknown

  • Eddy-driven sources and sinks of nutrients in the upper ocean: Results from a 0.1° resolution model of the North Atlantic

    D. J. McGillicuddy;L. A. Anderson;S. C. Doney;M. E. Maltrud

  • The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Description and Results at High Resolution

    Peter M. Caldwell;Azamat Mametjanov;Qi Tang;Luke P. Van Roekel

  • Global eddy-resolving ocean simulations driven by 1985-1995 atmospheric winds

    Mathew E. Maltrud;Richard D. Smith;Albert J. Semtner;Robert C. Malone

  • Regional sea level trends due to a Pacific trade wind intensification

    Mark A. Merrifield;Mathew E. Maltrud

  • The Parallel Ocean Program (POP) reference manual: Ocean component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM)

    R. Smith;P. Jones;P. Briegleb;O. Bryan

  • Simulated Lagrangian pathways between the Leeuwin Current System and the upper-ocean circulation of the southeast Indian Ocean

    Catia M. Domingues;Catia M. Domingues;Mathew E. Maltrud;Susan E. Wijffels;John A. Church

  • A prototype two-decade fully-coupled fine-resolution CCSM simulation

    Julie L. McClean;Julie L. McClean;David C. Bader;David C. Bader;Frank O. Bryan;Mathew E. Maltrud

  • Evaluation of the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian vertical coordinate method in the MPAS-Ocean model

    Mark R. Petersen;Douglas W. Jacobsen;Todd D. Ringler;Matthew W. Hecht

  • Water properties and circulation in Arctic Ocean models

    G. Holloway;F. Dupont;E. Golubeva;S. Häkkinen

  • Response of the Atlantic Ocean circulation to Greenland Ice Sheet melting in a strongly‐eddying ocean model

    W. Weijer;M. E. Maltrud;M. W. Hecht;H. A. Dijkstra

  • An Evaluation of the Ocean and Sea Ice Climate of E3SM Using MPAS and Interannual CORE-II Forcing

    Mark R. Petersen;Xylar S. Asay-Davis;Anne S. Berres;Qingshan Chen

  • Boundary impulse response functions in a century-long eddying global ocean simulation

    Mathew Maltrud;Frank Bryan;Synte Peacock

  • A three-dimensional eddy census of a high-resolution global ocean simulation

    Mark R. Petersen;Sean J. Williams;Sean J. Williams;Mathew E. Maltrud;Matthew W. Hecht

  • A Prototype Two-Decade Fully-Coupled Fine-Resolution CCSM Simulation

    Julie McClean;David Bader;Frank Bryan;Philip Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth C. Hunke
Elizabeth C. Hunke Los Alamos National Laboratory
Frank O. Bryan
Frank O. Bryan National Center for Atmospheric Research
Steven R. Jayne
Steven R. Jayne Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Jean-Christophe Golaz
Jean-Christophe Golaz Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Stephen F. Price
Stephen F. Price Los Alamos National Laboratory
Sarah T. Gille
Sarah T. Gille University of California, San Diego
Wieslaw Maslowski
Wieslaw Maslowski Naval Postgraduate School
William H. Lipscomb
William H. Lipscomb National Center for Atmospheric Research
Catia M. Domingues
Catia M. Domingues National Oceanography Centre
Forrest M. Hoffman
Forrest M. Hoffman Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options that can enhance your expertise and career prospects. For educators aiming to expand their qualifications, programs like the eds to edd bridge program provide a flexible pathway to advance from a master's level to a doctoral degree online.

For those interested in social impact roles within environmental contexts, pursuing one of the fully funded dsw programs online can be a valuable route. These programs prepare professionals to address societal challenges linked to environmental justice and community well-being.

If you seek a broader academic foundation, best affordable online general studies degree programs offer interdisciplinary curricula that can complement environmental science knowledge with skills from other fields, making you versatile in the job market.

For newcomers or those balancing busy schedules, understanding what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help in selecting a degree path that fits personal strengths while still aligning with career aspirations in the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Mathew E. Maltrud

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles