World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 47 5733 5495 2086 1929 128 9414

Mathew E. Maltrud publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mathew E. Maltrud between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mathew E. Maltrud published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2022. 7 of the 144 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2022. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1991 2025

144 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mathew E. Maltrud: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 5
2002 2
2003 5
2004 4
2005 4
2006 6
2007 5
2008 4
2009 4
2010 10
2011 12
2012 8
2013 6
2014 6
2015 5
2016 0
2017 3
2018 7
2019 7
2020 4
2021 7
2022 13
2023 4
2024 3
2025 4
Total 144
Download as CSV

Mathew E. Maltrud publications per year - data summary

  • Mathew E. Maltrud, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, has 144 publications recorded across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1991 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1991, 1993, 1999 and 2000, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 35 years in the span carry no publications at all (1992, 1994, 1995, 1996 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.0 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 31 publications, 22% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1991-2002: 13 publications (1.1 per year); 2003-2014: 74 publications (6.2 per year); 2015-2025: 57 publications (5.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mathew E. Maltrud publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew E. Maltrud sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 128
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mathew E. Maltrud publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Mathew E. Maltrud, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 128 publications - the 29th percentile of the discipline.
  • 29% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Mathew E. Maltrud, and about 71% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Mathew E. Maltrud ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Mathew E. Maltrud D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew E. Maltrud sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275 47
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Mathew E. Maltrud D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Mathew E. Maltrud, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 47 D-Index - the 42nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 42% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Mathew E. Maltrud, and about 58% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Mathew E. Maltrud ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Mathew E. Maltrud is affiliated with Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on several specialized subfields.

The main areas of study include:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Geology

Their work covers a range of topics related to atmospheric and environmental dynamics, climate modeling, and oceanographic processes. The key research topics can be summarized as follows:

  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics

Mathew E. Maltrud's recent publications illustrate engagement with Earth system modeling and biogeochemistry. Selected papers include:

  • The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation (2022), published in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • The DOE E3SM v1.1 Biogeochemistry Configuration: Description and Simulated Ecosystem-Climate Responses to Historical Changes in Forcing (2020), published in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Investigating controls on sea ice algal production using E3SMv1.1-BGC (2020), published in Annals of Glaciology
  • The fully coupled regionally refined model of E3SM version 2: overview of the atmosphere, land, and river results (2023), published in Geoscientific Model Development
  • The Influence of Ocean Topography on the Upwelling of Carbon in the Southern Ocean (2021), published in Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent coauthors contributing alongside Mathew E. Maltrud include:

  • Bryce E. Harrop
  • Susannah M. Burrows
  • L. Ruby Leung
  • Xiaoying Shi
  • Qi Tang

Their work has been published frequently in several venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Impact of partial steps and momentum advection schemes in a global ocean circulation model at eddy-permitting resolution

    Bernard Barnier;Gurvan Madec;Thierry Penduff;Jean-Marc Molines

  • The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution

    Jean Christophe Golaz;Peter M. Caldwell;Luke P. Van Roekel;Mark R. Petersen

  • Numerical Simulation of the North Atlantic Ocean at 1/10°

    Richard D. Smith;Mathew E. Maltrud;Frank O. Bryan;Matthew W. Hecht

  • A multi-resolution approach to global ocean modeling

    Todd Ringler;Mark Petersen;Robert L. Higdon;Doug Jacobsen

  • Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. III: Implementation and impact in global ocean climate simulations

    B. Fox-Kemper;B. Fox-Kemper;G. Danabasoglu;R. Ferrari;S.M. Griffies

  • An eddy resolving global 1/10° ocean simulation

    Mathew E Maltrud;Julie L McClean

  • Energy spectra and coherent structures in forced two-dimensional and beta-plane turbulence

    M. E. Maltrud;G. K. Vallis

  • The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation

    Unknown

  • Eddy-driven sources and sinks of nutrients in the upper ocean: Results from a 0.1° resolution model of the North Atlantic

    D. J. McGillicuddy;L. A. Anderson;S. C. Doney;M. E. Maltrud

  • The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Description and Results at High Resolution

    Peter M. Caldwell;Azamat Mametjanov;Qi Tang;Luke P. Van Roekel

  • Global eddy-resolving ocean simulations driven by 1985-1995 atmospheric winds

    Mathew E. Maltrud;Richard D. Smith;Albert J. Semtner;Robert C. Malone

  • Regional sea level trends due to a Pacific trade wind intensification

    Mark A. Merrifield;Mathew E. Maltrud

  • The Parallel Ocean Program (POP) reference manual: Ocean component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM)

    R. Smith;P. Jones;P. Briegleb;O. Bryan

  • Simulated Lagrangian pathways between the Leeuwin Current System and the upper-ocean circulation of the southeast Indian Ocean

    Catia M. Domingues;Catia M. Domingues;Mathew E. Maltrud;Susan E. Wijffels;John A. Church

  • A prototype two-decade fully-coupled fine-resolution CCSM simulation

    Julie L. McClean;Julie L. McClean;David C. Bader;David C. Bader;Frank O. Bryan;Mathew E. Maltrud

  • Evaluation of the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian vertical coordinate method in the MPAS-Ocean model

    Mark R. Petersen;Douglas W. Jacobsen;Todd D. Ringler;Matthew W. Hecht

  • Water properties and circulation in Arctic Ocean models

    G. Holloway;F. Dupont;E. Golubeva;S. Häkkinen

  • Response of the Atlantic Ocean circulation to Greenland Ice Sheet melting in a strongly‐eddying ocean model

    W. Weijer;M. E. Maltrud;M. W. Hecht;H. A. Dijkstra

  • An Evaluation of the Ocean and Sea Ice Climate of E3SM Using MPAS and Interannual CORE-II Forcing

    Mark R. Petersen;Xylar S. Asay-Davis;Anne S. Berres;Qingshan Chen

  • Boundary impulse response functions in a century-long eddying global ocean simulation

    Mathew Maltrud;Frank Bryan;Synte Peacock

  • A three-dimensional eddy census of a high-resolution global ocean simulation

    Mark R. Petersen;Sean J. Williams;Sean J. Williams;Mathew E. Maltrud;Matthew W. Hecht

  • A Prototype Two-Decade Fully-Coupled Fine-Resolution CCSM Simulation

    Julie McClean;David Bader;Frank Bryan;Philip Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth C. Hunke
Elizabeth C. Hunke Los Alamos National Laboratory
Frank O. Bryan
Frank O. Bryan National Center for Atmospheric Research
Steven R. Jayne
Steven R. Jayne Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Jean-Christophe Golaz
Jean-Christophe Golaz Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Stephen F. Price
Stephen F. Price Los Alamos National Laboratory
Sarah T. Gille
Sarah T. Gille University of California, San Diego
Wieslaw Maslowski
Wieslaw Maslowski Naval Postgraduate School
William H. Lipscomb
William H. Lipscomb National Center for Atmospheric Research
Catia M. Domingues
Catia M. Domingues National Oceanography Centre
Forrest M. Hoffman
Forrest M. Hoffman Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options that can enhance your expertise and career prospects. For educators aiming to expand their qualifications, programs like the eds to edd bridge program provide a flexible pathway to advance from a master's level to a doctoral degree online.

For those interested in social impact roles within environmental contexts, pursuing one of the fully funded dsw programs online can be a valuable route. These programs prepare professionals to address societal challenges linked to environmental justice and community well-being.

If you seek a broader academic foundation, best affordable online general studies degree programs offer interdisciplinary curricula that can complement environmental science knowledge with skills from other fields, making you versatile in the job market.

For newcomers or those balancing busy schedules, understanding what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help in selecting a degree path that fits personal strengths while still aligning with career aspirations in the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Mathew E. Maltrud

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles