World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Baylor Fox-Kemper

Baylor Fox-Kemper

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
14769
World Ranking
3059
National Ranking
1193

Baylor Fox-Kemper publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baylor Fox-Kemper sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 213 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Baylor Fox-Kemper D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baylor Fox-Kemper sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Baylor Fox-Kemper is a researcher affiliated with Brown University in the United States, focusing on Earth and Planetary Sciences with significant contributions in Environmental Science. Their research primarily addresses Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, and Atmospheric Science, with additional work in Environmental Chemistry and Pollution.

The scientist has published extensively on topics including Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Climate Variability and Models, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing, Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics, and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements.

Their recent publications cover a wide range of topics related to ocean and climate modeling. Notable papers include:

  • The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • The physical oceanography of the transport of floating marine debris, 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • Evaluation of global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), 2020, Geoscientific Model Development
  • Resolving and Parameterising the Ocean Mesoscale in Earth System Models, 2020, Current Climate Change Reports
  • Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), 2020, Geoscientific Model Development

Baylor Fox-Kemper has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Eric P. Chassignet
  • Helene T. Hewitt
  • Jihai Dong
  • Qiang Wang
  • Alexandra Bozec

Their work has appeared repeatedly in specific scientific journals and venues. The most common publication venues include:

  • Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)

    G. Danabasoglu;J. F. Lamarque;J. Bacmeister;D. A. Bailey

  • The physical oceanography of the transport of floating marine debris

    Erik van Sebille;Stefano Aliani;Kara Lavender Law;Nikolai Maximenko

  • Parameterization of Mixed Layer Eddies. Part I. Theory and Diagnosis

    Baylor Fox-Kemper;Raffaele Ferrari;Robert Hallberg

  • Mixed Layer Instabilities and Restratification

    Giulio Boccaletti;Raffaele Ferrari;Baylor Fox-Kemper

  • Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. III: Implementation and impact in global ocean climate simulations

    B. Fox-Kemper;B. Fox-Kemper;G. Danabasoglu;R. Ferrari;S.M. Griffies

  • OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project

    Stephen M. Griffies;Gokhan Danabasoglu;Paul J. Durack;Alistair J. Adcroft

  • A global perspective on Langmuir turbulence in the ocean surface boundary layer

    Stephen E. Belcher;Stephen E. Belcher;Alan A.L.M. Grant;Kirsty E. Hanley;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Baylor Fox-Kemper

  • Wind Waves in the Coupled Climate System

    L. Cavaleri;B. Fox-Kemper;M. Hemer

  • Challenges and Prospects in Ocean Circulation Models

    Baylor Fox-Kemper;Alistair Adcroft;Alistair Adcroft;Claus W. Böning;Eric P. Chassignet

  • Can Large Eddy Simulation Techniques Improve Mesoscale Rich Ocean Models

    B. Fox-Kemper;D. Menemenlis

  • Evaluation of global ocean–sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)

    Hiroyuki Tsujino;L. Shogo Urakawa;Stephen M. Griffies;Stephen M. Griffies;Gokhan Danabasoglu

  • Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. Part II: Prognosis and, impact

    Baylor Fox-Kemper;Raffaele Ferrari

  • Will There Be a Significant Change to El Niño in the Twenty-First Century?

    Samantha Stevenson;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Markus Jochum;Richard Neale

  • The Parallel Ocean Program (POP) reference manual: Ocean component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM)

    R. Smith;P. Jones;P. Briegleb;O. Bryan

  • The form and orientation of Langmuir cells for misaligned winds and waves

    L. P. Van Roekel;B. Fox-Kemper;B. Fox-Kemper;P. P. Sullivan;P. E. Hamlington

  • Parameterization of Frontal Symmetric Instabilities. I: Theory for Resolved Fronts

    Scott Bachman;B Fox-Kemper;John Taylor;LN Thomas

  • Langmuir mixing effects on global climate: WAVEWATCH III in CESM

    Qing Li;Adrean Webb;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Anthony Craig

  • The role of mixed-layer instabilities in submesoscale turbulence

    Jörn Callies;Glenn Flierl;Raffaele Ferrari;Baylor Fox-Kemper

  • Resolving and parameterising the ocean mesoscale in earth system models

    Helene T. Hewitt;Malcolm Roberts;Pierre Mathiot;Arne Biastoch

  • Quantifying upper ocean turbulence driven by surface waves

    E. A. D'Asaro;J. Thomson;A. Y. Shcherbina;R. R. Harcourt

  • Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean–sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)

    Eric P. Chassignet;Stephen G. Yeager;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Alexandra Bozec

  • Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. III: Implementation and impact in global ocean climate simulations

    B. Fox-Kemper;G. Danabasoglu;S.M. Griffies;R.W. Hallberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Gokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research
Stephen G. Yeager
Stephen G. Yeager National Center for Atmospheric Research
Alistair Adcroft
Alistair Adcroft Princeton University
Robert Hallberg
Robert Hallberg Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Eric P. Chassignet
Eric P. Chassignet Florida State University
William G. Large
William G. Large National Center for Atmospheric Research
Simon J. Marsland
Simon J. Marsland Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Markus Jochum
Markus Jochum University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences often leads to broader interests in education and social work fields. For professionals considering advanced education, options like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation offer accelerated paths without the lengthy dissertation, allowing quicker entry into leadership roles.

Students aiming to transition from faculty-level teaching roles to administrative or policy positions may find value in eds to edd program pathways, which build on existing credentials for advanced professional development.

Those interested in community health or policy advocacy alongside environmental science may explore social work, where degrees like the cheapest online dsw programs make doctorate-level education accessible without excessive financial burden.

For students uncertain about specialization, pursuing one of the most affordable online general studies degree programs can provide a flexible foundation, allowing exploration of interdisciplinary interests within environmental topics and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Baylor Fox-Kemper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles