World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Baylor Fox-Kemper

Baylor Fox-Kemper

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 59 3062 2928 1193 1107 213 14769

Baylor Fox-Kemper publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Baylor Fox-Kemper between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Baylor Fox-Kemper published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 12.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2016. 39 of the 287 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2016. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 24 publications
2003 2025

287 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Baylor Fox-Kemper: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 3
2009 3
2010 5
2011 6
2012 16
2013 12
2014 11
2015 13
2016 33
2017 15
2018 14
2019 21
2020 28
2021 16
2022 19
2023 27
2024 15
2025 24
Total 287
Download as CSV

Baylor Fox-Kemper publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baylor Fox-Kemper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 213 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282 213
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Baylor Fox-Kemper D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baylor Fox-Kemper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177 59
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Baylor Fox-Kemper is a researcher affiliated with Brown University in the United States, focusing on Earth and Planetary Sciences with significant contributions in Environmental Science. Their research primarily addresses Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, and Atmospheric Science, with additional work in Environmental Chemistry and Pollution.

The scientist has published extensively on topics including Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Climate Variability and Models, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing, Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics, and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements.

Their recent publications cover a wide range of topics related to ocean and climate modeling. Notable papers include:

  • The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • The physical oceanography of the transport of floating marine debris, 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • Evaluation of global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), 2020, Geoscientific Model Development
  • Resolving and Parameterising the Ocean Mesoscale in Earth System Models, 2020, Current Climate Change Reports
  • Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2), 2020, Geoscientific Model Development

Baylor Fox-Kemper has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Eric P. Chassignet
  • Helene T. Hewitt
  • Jihai Dong
  • Qiang Wang
  • Alexandra Bozec

Their work has appeared repeatedly in specific scientific journals and venues. The most common publication venues include:

  • Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)

    G. Danabasoglu;J. F. Lamarque;J. Bacmeister;D. A. Bailey

  • The physical oceanography of the transport of floating marine debris

    Erik van Sebille;Stefano Aliani;Kara Lavender Law;Nikolai Maximenko

  • Parameterization of Mixed Layer Eddies. Part I. Theory and Diagnosis

    Baylor Fox-Kemper;Raffaele Ferrari;Robert Hallberg

  • Mixed Layer Instabilities and Restratification

    Giulio Boccaletti;Raffaele Ferrari;Baylor Fox-Kemper

  • Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. III: Implementation and impact in global ocean climate simulations

    B. Fox-Kemper;B. Fox-Kemper;G. Danabasoglu;R. Ferrari;S.M. Griffies

  • OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project

    Stephen M. Griffies;Gokhan Danabasoglu;Paul J. Durack;Alistair J. Adcroft

  • A global perspective on Langmuir turbulence in the ocean surface boundary layer

    Stephen E. Belcher;Stephen E. Belcher;Alan A.L.M. Grant;Kirsty E. Hanley;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Baylor Fox-Kemper

  • Wind Waves in the Coupled Climate System

    L. Cavaleri;B. Fox-Kemper;M. Hemer

  • Challenges and Prospects in Ocean Circulation Models

    Baylor Fox-Kemper;Alistair Adcroft;Alistair Adcroft;Claus W. Böning;Eric P. Chassignet

  • Can Large Eddy Simulation Techniques Improve Mesoscale Rich Ocean Models

    B. Fox-Kemper;D. Menemenlis

  • Evaluation of global ocean–sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)

    Hiroyuki Tsujino;L. Shogo Urakawa;Stephen M. Griffies;Stephen M. Griffies;Gokhan Danabasoglu

  • Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. Part II: Prognosis and, impact

    Baylor Fox-Kemper;Raffaele Ferrari

  • Will There Be a Significant Change to El Niño in the Twenty-First Century?

    Samantha Stevenson;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Markus Jochum;Richard Neale

  • The Parallel Ocean Program (POP) reference manual: Ocean component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM)

    R. Smith;P. Jones;P. Briegleb;O. Bryan

  • The form and orientation of Langmuir cells for misaligned winds and waves

    L. P. Van Roekel;B. Fox-Kemper;B. Fox-Kemper;P. P. Sullivan;P. E. Hamlington

  • Parameterization of Frontal Symmetric Instabilities. I: Theory for Resolved Fronts

    Scott Bachman;B Fox-Kemper;John Taylor;LN Thomas

  • Langmuir mixing effects on global climate: WAVEWATCH III in CESM

    Qing Li;Adrean Webb;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Anthony Craig

  • The role of mixed-layer instabilities in submesoscale turbulence

    Jörn Callies;Glenn Flierl;Raffaele Ferrari;Baylor Fox-Kemper

  • Resolving and parameterising the ocean mesoscale in earth system models

    Helene T. Hewitt;Malcolm Roberts;Pierre Mathiot;Arne Biastoch

  • Quantifying upper ocean turbulence driven by surface waves

    E. A. D'Asaro;J. Thomson;A. Y. Shcherbina;R. R. Harcourt

  • Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean–sea ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)

    Eric P. Chassignet;Stephen G. Yeager;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Alexandra Bozec

  • Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. III: Implementation and impact in global ocean climate simulations

    B. Fox-Kemper;G. Danabasoglu;S.M. Griffies;R.W. Hallberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Gokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research
Stephen G. Yeager
Stephen G. Yeager National Center for Atmospheric Research
Alistair Adcroft
Alistair Adcroft Princeton University
Robert Hallberg
Robert Hallberg Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Eric P. Chassignet
Eric P. Chassignet Florida State University
William G. Large
William G. Large National Center for Atmospheric Research
Simon J. Marsland
Simon J. Marsland Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Markus Jochum
Markus Jochum University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences often leads to broader interests in education and social work fields. For professionals considering advanced education, options like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation offer accelerated paths without the lengthy dissertation, allowing quicker entry into leadership roles.

Students aiming to transition from faculty-level teaching roles to administrative or policy positions may find value in eds to edd program pathways, which build on existing credentials for advanced professional development.

Those interested in community health or policy advocacy alongside environmental science may explore social work, where degrees like the cheapest online dsw programs make doctorate-level education accessible without excessive financial burden.

For students uncertain about specialization, pursuing one of the most affordable online general studies degree programs can provide a flexible foundation, allowing exploration of interdisciplinary interests within environmental topics and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Baylor Fox-Kemper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles