World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
8264
World Ranking
7326
National Ranking
102

Markus Jochum publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Jochum sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Markus Jochum D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Jochum sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Jochum is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and specializes in research within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Oceanography, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's research extensively covers topics such as Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Climate variability and models, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research.

Markus Jochum has contributed to a variety of publications, with recent papers including:

  • "Atmospheric CO2 control of spontaneous millennial-scale ice age climate oscillations," 2022, Nature Geoscience
  • "Real-world rogue wave probabilities," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Fast, Cheap, and Turbulent-Global Ocean Modeling With GPU Acceleration in Python," 2021, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Dansgaard-Oeschger and Heinrich event temperature anomalies in the North Atlantic set by sea ice, frontal position and thermocline structure," 2022, Quaternary Science Reviews
  • "Multistability and intermediate tipping of the Atlantic Ocean circulation," 2024, Science Advances

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Climate, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Geoscientific Model Development.

Collaboration has been a consistent feature of Markus Jochum's career, with frequent co-authors including Roman Nuterman, Guido Vettoretti, Dion Häfner, Marta Mrozowska, and Swantje Bastin.

Best Publications

  • The impact of global warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Nino

    Mat Collins;Mat Collins;Soon Il An;Wenju Cai;Alexandre Ganachaud

  • The CCSM4 Ocean Component

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Susan C. Bates;Bruce P. Briegleb;Steven R. Jayne

  • The Impact of Convection on ENSO: From a Delayed Oscillator to a Series of Events

    Richard B. Neale;Jadwiga H. Richter;Markus Jochum

  • On the Future of Argo: A Global, Full-Depth, Multi-Disciplinary Array

    Dean Roemmich;Matthew H. Alford;Hervé Claustre;Kenneth Johnson

  • A new synoptic scale resolving global climate simulation using the Community Earth System Model

    R. Justin Small;Julio Bacmeister;David Bailey;Allison Baker

  • Climate Process Team on Internal Wave–Driven Ocean Mixing

    Jennifer A. MacKinnon;Zhongxiang Zhao;Caitlin B. Whalen;Amy F. Waterhouse

  • Beyond the bipolar seesaw: toward a process understanding of interhemispheric coupling

    Joel B. Pedro;Markus Jochum;Christo Buizert;Feng He;Feng He

  • The Impact of Oceanic Near-Inertial Waves on Climate

    Markus Jochum;Bruce P. Briegleb;Gokhan Danabasoglu;William G. Large

  • Will There Be a Significant Change to El Niño in the Twenty-First Century?

    Samantha Stevenson;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Markus Jochum;Richard Neale

  • The Parallel Ocean Program (POP) reference manual: Ocean component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM)

    R. Smith;P. Jones;P. Briegleb;O. Bryan

  • The Low-Resolution CCSM4

    Christine A. Shields;David A. Bailey;Gokhan Danabasoglu;Markus Jochum

  • Tropical instability waves in the Atlantic Ocean

    Markus Jochum;Paola Malanotte-Rizzoli;Antonio Busalacchi

  • Atmospheric CO2 control of spontaneous millennial-scale ice age climate oscillations

    Unknown

  • Ocean viscosity and climate

    M. Jochum;G. Danabasoglu;M. Holland;Y.-O. Kwon

  • Temperature Advection by Tropical Instability Waves

    Markus Jochum;Raghu Murtugudde

  • Impact of latitudinal variations in vertical diffusivity on climate simulations

    Markus Jochum

  • Stochastic Atmospheric Forcing as a Cause of Greenland Climate Transitions

    Hannah Kleppin;Markus Jochum;Bette Otto-Bliesner;Christine A. Shields

  • Seasonal Effects of Indian Ocean Freshwater Forcing in a Regional Coupled Model

    Hyodae Seo;Shang-Ping Xie;Raghu Murtugudde;Markus Jochum

  • Quantification of the Feedback between Phytoplankton and ENSO in the Community Climate System Model

    Markus Jochum;Stephen Yeager;Keith Lindsay;Keith Moore

  • PIRATA: A Sustained Observing System for Tropical Atlantic Climate Research and Forecasting

    Bernard Bourlès;Moacyr Araujo;Michael J. McPhaden;Peter Brandt;Peter Brandt

  • Feedback of Tropical Instability-Wave-Induced Atmospheric Variability onto the Ocean

    Hyodae Seo;Markus Jochum;Raghu Murtugudde;Arthur J. Miller

  • ENSO Model Validation Using Wavelet Probability Analysis

    Samantha Stevenson;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Markus Jochum;Balaji Rajagopalan

Frequent Co-Authors

Raghu Murtugudde
Raghu Murtugudde University of Maryland, College Park
Carsten Eden
Carsten Eden Universität Hamburg
Arthur J. Miller
Arthur J. Miller University of California, San Diego
Sune Olander Rasmussen
Sune Olander Rasmussen University of Copenhagen
Gokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research
Stephen G. Yeager
Stephen G. Yeager National Center for Atmospheric Research
Richard Neale
Richard Neale National Center for Atmospheric Research
Keith Lindsay
Keith Lindsay National Center for Atmospheric Research
Steven R. Jayne
Steven R. Jayne Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. Many students complement their knowledge with specialized fields such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS), essential for spatial data analysis and environmental mapping. Pursuing a gis degree online can enhance technical expertise critical for roles in conservation, urban planning, and resource management.

For those looking to advance into leadership or administrative roles within environmental agencies or non-profits, a one-year best online mpa program can provide valuable public administration skills without a significant time commitment.

Understanding societal impacts and community dynamics is also crucial in environmental work. An online sociology bachelor degree online can broaden perspectives on human-environment interactions, preparing graduates for policy analysis and community outreach careers.

Finally, for professionals aiming for the highest academic or research roles, enrolling in online doctoral programs without dissertation offers a flexible pathway to doctoral credentials, emphasizing coursework and applied research over traditional dissertation formats.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Jochum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles