World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
26017
World Ranking
3162
National Ranking
32

Josien P. W. Pluim publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josien P. W. Pluim sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 281 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Josien P. W. Pluim D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josien P. W. Pluim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Josien P. W. Pluim is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily within medicine and computer science, focusing notably on radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their work encompasses various subfields including artificial intelligence, oncology, and biomedical engineering. The main topics covered by their research include radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, advanced MRI techniques and applications, AI in cancer detection, medical image segmentation techniques, medical imaging techniques and applications, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, and advanced neural network applications.

Josien P. W. Pluim has contributed extensively to scientific literature, with a significant presence in several publication venues. Frequent venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging
  • Medical Image Analysis

Among their recent publications are:

  • "associated_data_Investigating the Effectiveness of clDice Loss for Road Crack Segmentation," 2025, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Deep Learning Regression for Prostate Cancer Detection and Grading in Bi-Parametric MRI," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • "Adversarial attack vulnerability of medical image analysis systems: Unexplored factors," 2021, Medical Image Analysis
  • "Deep learning-based breast cancer grading and survival analysis on whole-slide histopathology images," 2022, Scientific Reports
  • "Cross-scanner and cross-protocol multi-shell diffusion MRI data harmonization: Algorithms and results," 2020, NeuroImage

Collaborations form a notable aspect of their scientific output. Frequent coauthors working alongside Josien P. W. Pluim include:

  • Mitko Veta
  • Marcel Breeuwer
  • Sina Amirrajab
  • Yasmina Al Khalil
  • Cristian Lorenz

This researcher's body of work represents a interdisciplinary approach blending medicine and technology, with a strong emphasis on the development and application of artificial intelligence methods to medical imaging problems. Their contributions are documented across diverse, often high-impact, venues in medical imaging and machine learning communities.

Best Publications

  • elastix : A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration

    S. Klein;M. Staring;K. Murphy;M.A. Viergever

  • Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey

    J.P.W. Pluim;J.B.A. Maintz;M.A. Viergever

  • Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information

    J.P.W. Pluim;J.B.A. Maintz;M.A. Viergever

  • Not-so-supervised: A survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysis

    Veronika Cheplygina;Marleen de Bruijne;Josien P.W. Pluim

  • Gland segmentation in colon histology images: The GlaS challenge contest

    Korsuk Sirinukunwattana;Josien P.W. Pluim;Hao Chen;Xiaojuan Qi

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- Miccai 2010

    Tianzi Jiang;Nassir Navab;Josien P. W. Pluim;Max A. Viergever

  • Breast Cancer Histopathology Image Analysis: A Review

    Mitko Veta;Josien P. W. Pluim;Paul J. van Diest;Max A. Viergever

  • Evaluation of Optimization Methods for Nonrigid Medical Image Registration Using Mutual Information and B-Splines

    S. Klein;M. Staring;J.P.W. Pluim

  • Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information.

    Stefan Klein;Uulke A. van der Heide;Irene M. Lips;Marco van Vulpen

  • Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images

    Mitko Veta;Paul J. van Diest;Stefan M. Willems;Haibo Wang

  • Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimisation for Image Registration

    Stefan Klein;Josien P. Pluim;Marius Staring;Max A. Viergever

  • Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge

    K. Murphy;B. van Ginneken;J. M. Reinhardt;S. Kabus

  • Interpolation Artefacts in Mutual Information-Based Image Registration

    Josien P.W. Pluim;J.B. Antoine Maintz;Max A. Viergever

  • Automatic Nuclei Segmentation in H&E Stained Breast Cancer Histopathology Images

    Mitko Veta;Paul J. van Diest;Robert Kornegoor;André Huisman

  • Robust Retinal Vessel Segmentation via Locally Adaptive Derivative Frames in Orientation Scores

    Jiong Zhang;Behdad Dashtbozorg;Erik Bekkers;Josien P. W. Pluim

  • clDice - a Novel Topology-Preserving Loss Function for Tubular Structure Segmentation

    Suprosanna Shit;Johannes C. Paetzold;Anjany Sekuboyina;Ivan Ezhov

  • A survey of medical image registration - under review

    Max A. Viergever;J.B. Antoine Maintz;Stefan Klein;Keelin Murphy

  • Label Fusion in Atlas-Based Segmentation Using a Selective and Iterative Method for Performance Level Estimation (SIMPLE)

    Thomas Robin Langerak;U A van der Heide;A N T J Kotte;M A Viergever

  • Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images: The TUPAC16 challenge.

    Mitko Veta;Yujing J. Heng;Nikolas Stathonikos;Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi

  • Car license plate recognition with neural networks and fuzzy logic

    J.A.G. Nijhuis;M.H. Ter Brugge;K.A. Helmholt;J.P.W. Pluim

  • Image registration

    J.P.W. Pluim;J.M. Fitzpatrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Max A. Viergever
Max A. Viergever Utrecht University
Stefan Klein
Stefan Klein Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marius Staring
Marius Staring Leiden University Medical Center
Bram van Ginneken
Bram van Ginneken Radboud University
Ivana Išgum
Ivana Išgum University of Amsterdam
Nick F. Ramsey
Nick F. Ramsey Utrecht University
Marleen de Bruijne
Marleen de Bruijne Erasmus University Rotterdam
Joseph M. Reinhardt
Joseph M. Reinhardt University of Iowa
Wiro J. Niessen
Wiro J. Niessen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nassir Navab
Nassir Navab Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science doesn’t have to follow a single path. Many students start with the easiest associate degree to get online, building foundational skills that lead to higher degrees or immediate entry-level roles. Online education now covers a wide spectrum—from two-year programs to advanced options like an ed d degree, which is ideal for those interested in educational leadership, technology, and policy roles.

Choosing the right institution plays a key role in your academic journey. Check out what are the best online universities to ensure you receive a quality, accredited education that supports your career goals.

For those with a creative edge, pursuing a game art degree online offers a specialized path into the rapidly growing gaming industry.

Each of these online degree options opens unique career pathways, allowing flexibility and broad opportunities in the field of Computer Science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Josien P. W. Pluim

Trending Scientists