World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt

Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 54 4475 4346 62 57 276 15781

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2019. 9 of the 340 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2019. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 7 publications
1997 2025

340 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 6
2001 12
2002 6
2003 15
2004 11
2005 15
2006 7
2007 9
2008 7
2009 7
2010 11
2011 14
2012 10
2013 15
2014 12
2015 21
2016 21
2017 22
2018 21
2019 23
2020 20
2021 16
2022 12
2023 11
2024 2
2025 7
Total 340
Download as CSV

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt publications per year - data summary

  • Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, a Computer Science scholar from Leiden University Medical Center, has 340 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1997, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 11.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.7 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 48 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 79 publications (7.9 per year); 2007-2016: 127 publications (12.7 per year); 2017-2025: 134 publications (14.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 272–281 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 276 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335 276
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, a Computer Science scholar from Leiden University Medical Center, records 276 publications - the 69th percentile of the discipline.
  • 69% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, and about 31% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500 54
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, a Computer Science scholar from Leiden University Medical Center, records 54 D-Index - the 69th percentile of the discipline.
  • 69% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, and about 31% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on areas within Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, encompassing 71 publications in this field. Within these, key subfields include Molecular Biology, Neurology, Biophysics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Immunology.

Their main topics of work cover:

  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Gene expression and cancer classification
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Lelieveldt has co-authored frequently with several researchers, including Thomas Höllt, Tamim Abdelaal, Jeroen Eggermont, Ahmed Mahfouz, and Marcel Reinders. Their work appears in various publication venues, with the most frequent being bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature Neuroscience, and Nature.

Among their recent published papers are:

  • "Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science," published in 2020 in Genome Biology
  • "Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse," published in 2021 in Nature
  • "Comparative transcriptomics reveals human-specific cortical features," published in 2023 in Science
  • "Iron loading is a prominent feature of activated microglia in Alzheimer's disease patients," published in 2021 in Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • "A machine learning method for the discovery of minimum marker gene combinations for cell type identification from single-cell RNA sequencing," published in 2021 in Genome Research

Best Publications

  • Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex.

    Rebecca D. Hodge;Trygve E. Bakken;Jeremy A. Miller;Kimberly A. Smith

  • Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science

    David Lähnemann;David Lähnemann;Johannes Köster;Johannes Köster;Ewa Szczurek;Davis J. McCarthy;Davis J. McCarthy

  • Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse

    Trygve E. Bakken;Nikolas L. Jorstad;Qiwen Hu;Blue B. Lake

  • Fast parallel image registration on CPU and GPU for diagnostic classification of Alzheimer's disease.

    Denis P Shamonin;Esther E Bron;Boudewijn P.F. Lelieveldt;Marion Smits

  • An objective comparison of cell-tracking algorithms

    Vladimír Ulman;Martin Maška;Klas E G Magnusson;Olaf Ronneberger

  • A new cluster validity index for the fuzzy c-mean

    M. Ramze Rezaee;B. B.F. Lelieveldt;J. H.C. Reiber

  • 3-D active appearance models: segmentation of cardiac MR and ultrasound images

    S.C. Mitchell;J.G. Bosch;B.P.F. Lelieveldt;R.J. van der Geest

  • Multistage hybrid active appearance model matching: segmentation of left and right ventricles in cardiac MR images

    S.C. Mitchell;B.P.F. Lelieveldt;R.J. van der Geest;H.G. Bosch

  • Automatic segmentation of echocardiographic sequences by active appearance motion models

    J.G. Bosch;S.C. Mitchell;B.P.F. Lelieveldt;F. Nijland

  • Nonrigid image registration using multi-scale 3D convolutional neural networks

    Hessam Sokooti;Bob D. de Vos;Floris F. Berendsen;Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt;Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt

  • Approximated and User Steerable tSNE for Progressive Visual Analytics

    Nicola Pezzotti;Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt;Laurens van der Maaten;Thomas Hollt

  • SPASM: A 3D-ASM for segmentation of sparse and arbitrarily oriented cardiac MRI data

    Hans C. van Assen;Mikhail G. Danilouchkine;Alejandro F. Frangi;Sebastián Ordás

  • Visual analysis of mass cytometry data by hierarchical stochastic neighbour embedding reveals rare cell types

    Vincent van Unen;Thomas Höllt;Thomas Höllt;Nicola Pezzotti;Na Li

  • A community-based transcriptomics classification and nomenclature of neocortical cell types

    Rafael Yuste;Michael Hawrylycz;Nadia Aalling;Argel Aguilar-Valles

  • 2D–3D shape reconstruction of the distal femur from stereo X-ray imaging using statistical shape models

    N. Baka;B.L. Kaptein;M. de Bruijne;M. de Bruijne;T. van Walsum

  • Morphological maturation of the mouse brain: An in vivo MRI and histology investigation

    Luam Hammelrath;Siniša Škokić;Siniša Škokić;Artem Khmelinskii;Andreas Hess

  • DeepEyes: Progressive Visual Analytics for Designing Deep Neural Networks

    Nicola Pezzotti;Thomas Hollt;Jan Van Gemert;Boudewijn P.F. Lelieveldt

  • A multiresolution image segmentation technique based on pyramidal segmentation and fuzzy clustering

    Unknown

  • Data-driven identification of prognostic tumor subpopulations using spatially mapped t-SNE of mass spectrometry imaging data

    Walid M. Abdelmoula;Benjamin Balluff;Sonja Englert;Jouke Dijkstra

  • Vortex flow during early and late left ventricular filling in normal subjects: quantitative characterization using retrospectively-gated 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and three-dimensional vortex core analysis

    Mohammed S M Elbaz;Emmeline E Calkoen;Jos J M Westenberg;Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt;Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt

  • Automatic segmentation and plaque characterization in atherosclerotic carotid artery MR images

    I. M. Adame;R. J. van der Geest;B. A. Wasserman;M. A. Mohamed

  • Hierarchical stochastic neighbor embedding

    N. Pezzotti;T. Höllt;B. Lelieveldt;E. Eisemann

  • Brain maturation of the adolescent rat cortex and striatum: Changes in volume and myelination

    Luam Mengler;Artem Khmelinskii;Michael Diedenhofen;Chrystelle Po

  • A community-based transcriptomics classification and nomenclature of neocortical cell types.

    Rafael Yuste;Michael Hawrylycz;Nadia Aalling;Detlev Arendt

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan H. C. Reiber
Johan H. C. Reiber Leiden University Medical Center
Rob J. van der Geest
Rob J. van der Geest Leiden University Medical Center
Marius Staring
Marius Staring Leiden University Medical Center
Milan Sonka
Milan Sonka University of Iowa
Wiro J. Niessen
Wiro J. Niessen University Medical Center Groningen
Anna Vilanova
Anna Vilanova Eindhoven University of Technology
Clemens W.G.M. Löwik
Clemens W.G.M. Löwik Erasmus University Rotterdam
Frits Koning
Frits Koning Leiden University Medical Center
Alejandro F. Frangi
Alejandro F. Frangi University of Manchester
Elmar Eisemann
Elmar Eisemann Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

In addition to traditional Computer Science programs, a wide range of online degree pathways can complement or enhance your studies in the USA. For professionals aiming for leadership roles, the executive mba offers advanced business management skills that pair well with technical expertise.

Those seeking to bridge technology and information science may consider an online mlis (Master of Library and Information Science), which focuses on digital data management and resources—critical in today's data-driven world.

If affordability is a concern, explore the cheapest online graduate programs to discover flexible degree options across disciplines, including computer science and related fields.

Finally, those interested in high-level organizational roles might pursue a phd organizational leadership to develop advanced leadership and research skills. These diverse online pathways expand your career options and make advanced education more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles