World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 40 9244 8977 165 155 241 7496

Elmar Eisemann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elmar Eisemann between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elmar Eisemann published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2011. 22 of the 267 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2011. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 9 publications
2002 2025

267 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elmar Eisemann: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 3
2007 2
2008 11
2009 7
2010 13
2011 34
2012 12
2013 5
2014 13
2015 16
2016 21
2017 24
2018 19
2019 12
2020 11
2021 13
2022 17
2023 10
2024 13
2025 9
Total 267
Download as CSV

Elmar Eisemann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elmar Eisemann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 232–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 241 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423 241
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Elmar Eisemann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elmar Eisemann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 40
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elmar Eisemann is a researcher affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, specializing in computer science with a focus on computer vision, computer graphics, and related fields. Their body of work spans a range of topics including advanced imaging techniques, visual perception, and 3D shape modeling.

The primary fields of study for Elmar Eisemann include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computational Mechanics

Main research topics explored by Eisemann are:

  • Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Color Science and Applications
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Color perception and design
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Eisemann has published extensively in several leading venues, including:

  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Computers & Graphics

Frequent co-authors working with Eisemann include:

  • Sylvia C. Pont
  • Klaus Hildebrandt
  • Thomas Höllt
  • Anna Vilanova
  • Cehao Yu

Recent publications by Elmar Eisemann cover diverse topics in computer vision and graphics. These include:

  • "Systems analysis and controlled malaria infection in Europeans and Africans elucidate naturally acquired immunity," 2021, Nature Immunology
  • "DeltaConv," 2022, ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "A learning approach for river debris detection," 2022, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • "Deep vanishing point detection: Geometric priors make dataset variations vanish," 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • "Multi-scale optical coherence tomography imaging and visualization of Vermeer's Girl with a Pearl Earring," 2020, Optics Express

Best Publications

  • Flash photography enhancement via intrinsic relighting

    Elmar Eisemann;Frédo Durand

  • GigaVoxels: ray-guided streaming for efficient and detailed voxel rendering

    Cyril Crassin;Fabrice Neyret;Sylvain Lefebvre;Elmar Eisemann

  • Approximated and User Steerable tSNE for Progressive Visual Analytics

    Nicola Pezzotti;Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt;Laurens van der Maaten;Thomas Hollt

  • Interactive Indirect Illumination Using Voxel Cone Tracing

    Cyril Crassin;Fabrice Neyret;Miguel Sainz;Simon Green

  • Visual analysis of mass cytometry data by hierarchical stochastic neighbour embedding reveals rare cell types

    Vincent van Unen;Thomas Höllt;Thomas Höllt;Nicola Pezzotti;Na Li

  • A 30 m Resolution Surface Water Mask Including Estimation of Positional and Thematic Differences Using Landsat 8, SRTM and OpenStreetMap: A Case Study in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia

    Gennadii Donchyts;Jaap Schellekens;Hessel Winsemius;Elmar Eisemann

  • Real-time lens blur effects and focus control

    Sungkil Lee;Elmar Eisemann;Hans-Peter Seidel

  • DeepEyes: Progressive Visual Analytics for Designing Deep Neural Networks

    Nicola Pezzotti;Thomas Hollt;Jan Van Gemert;Boudewijn P.F. Lelieveldt

  • Fast scene voxelization and applications

    Elmar Eisemann;Xavier Décoret

  • Hierarchical stochastic neighbor embedding

    N. Pezzotti;T. Höllt;B. Lelieveldt;E. Eisemann

  • A perceptual model for disparity

    Piotr Didyk;Tobias Ritschel;Elmar Eisemann;Karol Myszkowski

  • Cytosplore: Interactive Immune Cell Phenotyping for Large Single-Cell Datasets

    T. Höllt;N. Pezzotti;V. van Unen;F. Koning

  • Real-Time Shadows

    Elmar Eisemann;Michael Schwarz;Ulf Assarsson;Michael Wimmer

  • Automatic photo-to-terrain alignment for the annotation of mountain pictures

    Lionel Baboud;Martin Cadik;Elmar Eisemann;Hans-Peter Seidel

  • A reconfigurable camera add-on for high dynamic range, multispectral, polarization, and light-field imaging

    Alkhazur Manakov;John F. Restrepo;Oliver Klehm;Ramon Hegedüs

  • Single-pass GPU solid voxelization for real-time applications

    Elmar Eisemann;Xavier Décoret

  • CNNs on surfaces using rotation-equivariant features

    Ruben Wiersma;Elmar Eisemann;Klaus Hildebrandt

  • Depth-of-field rendering with multiview synthesis

    Sungkil Lee;Elmar Eisemann;Hans-Peter Seidel

  • Sample based visibility for soft shadows using alias-free shadow maps

    Erik Sintorn;Elmar Eisemann;Ulf Assarsson

  • Physically-based real-time lens flare rendering

    Matthias Hullin;Elmar Eisemann;Hans-Peter Seidel;Sungkil Lee

  • A luminance-contrast-aware disparity model and applications

    Piotr Didyk;Tobias Ritschel;Elmar Eisemann;Karol Myszkowski

  • Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering

    Michael Manzke;Elmar Eisemann;Eugene Fiume

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Peter Seidel
Hans-Peter Seidel Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Anna Vilanova
Anna Vilanova Eindhoven University of Technology
Tobias Ritschel
Tobias Ritschel University College London
Karol Myszkowski
Karol Myszkowski Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt Leiden University Medical Center
Michael Schwarz
Michael Schwarz Flinders University
Marcus Magnor
Marcus Magnor Technische Universität Braunschweig
Frits Koning
Frits Koning Leiden University Medical Center
Fabrice Neyret
Fabrice Neyret French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to broad educational and career opportunities. Many students are now exploring flexible alternatives—like online degrees—to help balance their studies with work or personal commitments.

For those seeking leadership or business skills, the cheapest mba online programs offer a practical way to supplement technical expertise with management training. Alternatively, if you’re aiming for rapid career advancement, consider one of the one year masters programs online to earn your credentials in less time.

If speed and return on investment are your top priorities, exploring the fastest degree to get online can help you kickstart your career with minimal delay. As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly crucial in tech fields, finding the best online ai degree programs can position you at the forefront of innovation and job opportunities.

By combining online learning with career-focused planning, you can design a study path that suits your pace, budget, and ambitions—helping you make the most of your Computer Science journey in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Elmar Eisemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles