World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5608
World Ranking
9408
National Ranking
466

Carsten Dachsbacher publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Dachsbacher sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 187 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Carsten Dachsbacher D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Dachsbacher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carsten Dachsbacher is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research spans across multiple fields within computer science and engineering, with significant contributions to computer vision, computer graphics, and computational mechanics.

The scientist's main research domains include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these domains, their subfields of study cover:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Environmental Engineering

The primary research topics addressed in their work are:

  • Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Data Management and Algorithms

Frequent publication venues for their research outputs include:

  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
  • Eurographics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their contributions:

  • Visual Analysis of Large Multivariate Scattered Data using Clustering and Probabilistic Summaries (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Sensor-Realistic Simulations for Evaluation and Planning of Optical Measurement Systems With an Application to Laser Triangulation (2020), published in IEEE Sensors Journal
  • Procedural Physically based BRDF for Real-Time Rendering of Glints (2020), published in Computer Graphics Forum
  • Real-Time Geometric Glint Anti-Aliasing with Normal Map Filtering (2021), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
  • Path Guiding with Vertex Triplet Distributions (2022), published in Computer Graphics Forum

Collaborations have involved several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Johannes Hanika
  • Vincent Schüßler
  • Max Piochowiak
  • Tobias Rapp
  • Xavier Chermain

Best Publications

  • Reflective shadow maps

    Carsten Dachsbacher;Marc Stamminger

  • Sequential point trees

    Carsten Dachsbacher;Christian Vogelgsang;Marc Stamminger

  • Imperfect shadow maps for efficient computation of indirect illumination

    T. Ritschel;T. Grosch;M. H. Kim;H.-P. Seidel

  • Cascaded light propagation volumes for real-time indirect illumination

    Anton Kaplanyan;Carsten Dachsbacher

  • The State of the Art in Interactive Global Illumination

    Tobias Ritschel;Carsten Dachsbacher;Thorsten Grosch;Jan Kautz

  • Splatting indirect illumination

    Carsten Dachsbacher;Marc Stamminger

  • Translucent shadow maps

    Carsten Dachsbacher;Marc Stamminger

  • Spatiotemporal variance-guided filtering: real-time reconstruction for path-traced global illumination

    Christoph Schied;Anton Kaplanyan;Chris Wyman;Anjul Patney

  • Perspective accurate splatting

    Matthias Zwicker;Jussi Räsänen;Mario Botsch;Carsten Dachsbacher

  • Scalable Realistic Rendering with Many-Light Methods

    Carsten Dachsbacher;Jaroslav Křivánek;Miloš Hašan;Adam Arbree

  • Micro-rendering for scalable, parallel final gathering

    T. Ritschel;T. Engelhardt;T. Grosch;H.-P. Seidel

  • Implicit visibility and antiradiance for interactive global illumination

    Carsten Dachsbacher;Marc Stamminger;George Drettakis;Frédo Durand

  • Multiple-scattering microfacet BSDFs with the Smith model

    Eric Heitz;Johannes Hanika;Eugene d'Eon;Carsten Dachsbacher

  • Virtual ray lights for rendering scenes with participating media

    Jan Novák;Derek Nowrouzezahrai;Carsten Dachsbacher;Wojciech Jarosz

  • The SGGX microflake distribution

    Eric Heitz;Jonathan Dupuy;Cyril Crassin;Carsten Dachsbacher

  • Multiplexed metropolis light transport

    Toshiya Hachisuka;Anton S. Kaplanyan;Carsten Dachsbacher

  • CUDASA: compute unified device and systems architecture

    M. Strengert;C. Müller;C. Dachsbacher;T. Ertl

  • Dual-color mixing for fused deposition modeling printers

    Tim Reiner;Tim Reiner;Nathan Carr;Radomír Měch;Ondřej Št'ava

  • Adaptive progressive photon mapping

    Anton S. Kaplanyan;Carsten Dachsbacher

  • The natural-constraint representation of the path space for efficient light transport simulation

    Anton S. Kaplanyan;Johannes Hanika;Carsten Dachsbacher

  • Scalable Realistic Rendering with Many-Light Methods.

    Carsten Dachsbacher;Jaroslav Krivánek;Milos Hasan;Adam Arbree

  • The gödel engine - an interactive approach to visualization in general relativity

    Frank Grave;Thomas Müller;Carsten Dachsbacher;Günter Wunner

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Stamminger
Marc Stamminger University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Tobias Ritschel
Tobias Ritschel University College London
Jan Kautz
Jan Kautz Nvidia (United States)
Wojciech Jarosz
Wojciech Jarosz Dartmouth College
Sylvain Lefebvre
Sylvain Lefebvre University of Lorraine
Hans-Peter Seidel
Hans-Peter Seidel Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Thomas Ertl
Thomas Ertl University of Stuttgart
Derek Nowrouzezahrai
Derek Nowrouzezahrai McGill University
Daniel Weiskopf
Daniel Weiskopf University of Stuttgart
George Drettakis
George Drettakis French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online options for a Computer Science degree opens up flexible and accessible pathways to high-demand careers. For those looking for a fast-track, 2 year online degrees offer a quick entry into the tech workforce or a stepping stone toward a bachelor's degree.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. Fortunately, there are cheap online colleges that make quality education more affordable without compromising standards. These options can help reduce student debt and make earning a degree more attainable.

Students with less competitive academic backgrounds will be pleased to know there are reputable online colleges that accept low gpa. These institutions provide a second chance to pursue tech careers and develop sought-after skills.

Graduates in computer science and related fields can also look into adjacent career paths. For example, there are high-paying jobs with environmental science degree backgrounds that combine tech skills with environmental impact—showing the versatility of STEM education.

Best Scientists Citing Carsten Dachsbacher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles