World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
4799
World Ranking
8542
National Ranking
3648

Wojciech Jarosz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wojciech Jarosz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 125 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Wojciech Jarosz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wojciech Jarosz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wojciech Jarosz is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States and has a research career primarily focused on computer science and engineering. Their work spans a range of subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, computer graphics and computer-aided design, global and planetary change, computational mechanics, and instrumentation.

The scientist's research contributions cover multiple main topics including computer graphics and visualization techniques, advanced vision and imaging, data visualization and analytics, advanced optical sensing technologies, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, and surface roughness and optical measurements.

Wojciech Jarosz's recent publications illustrate their involvement in areas related to real-time rendering, materials science, and unbiased rendering techniques. Selected papers include:

  • Spatiotemporal reservoir resampling for real-time ray tracing with dynamic direct lighting (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • Effect of Artificial Aging on Mechanical and Tribological Properties of CAD/CAM Composite Materials Used in Dentistry (2021), published in Materials
  • The design and evolution of the UberBake light baking system (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • Unbiased and consistent rendering using biased estimators (2022), published in ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • A bidirectional formulation for Walk on Spheres (2022), published in Computer Graphics Forum

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Wojciech Jarosz include Benedikt Bitterli, Dario Seyb, Juhyeon Kim, Adithya Pediredla, and Katherine Salesin. This collaboration network reflects ongoing partnerships in research projects and publications.

The scientist has published extensively in venues such as ACM Transactions on Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Materials, and on arXiv (Cornell University). Among these, ACM Transactions on Graphics stands out as the most frequent publication venue with seven papers.

In addition to journal and conference papers, Wojciech Jarosz has a book publication with Polish Scientific Publishers PWN titled Podstawy biologii człowieka - komórka, tkanki, rozwój, dziedziczenie (2022), which adds to the diversity of their scholarly output.

Best Publications

  • Wavelet importance sampling: efficiently evaluating products of complex functions

    Petrik Clarberg;Wojciech Jarosz;Tomas Akenine-Möller;Henrik Wann Jensen

  • Multidimensional adaptive sampling and reconstruction for ray tracing

    Toshiya Hachisuka;Wojciech Jarosz;Richard Peter Weistroffer;Kevin Dale

  • Recent Advances in Adaptive Sampling and Reconstruction for Monte Carlo Rendering

    M. Zwicker;W. Jarosz;J. Lehtinen;B. Moon

  • A comprehensive theory of volumetric radiance estimation using photon points and beams

    Wojciech Jarosz;Derek Nowrouzezahrai;Iman Sadeghi;Henrik Wann Jensen

  • Hair photobooth: geometric and photometric acquisition of real hairstyles

    Sylvain Paris;Will Chang;Oleg I. Kozhushnyan;Wojciech Jarosz

  • A progressive error estimation framework for photon density estimation

    Toshiya Hachisuka;Wojciech Jarosz;Henrik Wann Jensen

  • Monte Carlo Methods for Volumetric Light Transport Simulation

    Jan Novák;Iliyan Georgiev;Johannes Hanika;Wojciech Jarosz

  • The beam radiance estimate for volumetric photon mapping

    Wojciech Jarosz;Matthias Zwicker;Henrik Wann Jensen

  • The Beam Radiance Estimate for Volumetric Photon Mapping

    Wojciech Jarosz;Matthias Zwicker;Henrik Wann Jensen

  • A framework for transient rendering

    Adrian Jarabo;Julio Marco;Adolfo Muñoz;Raul Buisan

  • Spatiotemporal reservoir resampling for real-time ray tracing with dynamic direct lighting

    Benedikt Bitterli;Chris Wyman;Matt Pharr;Peter Shirley

  • Goal‐based Caustics

    Marios Papas;Wojciech Jarosz;Wenzel Jakob;Szymon Rusinkiewicz

  • Nonlinearly Weighted First-order Regression for Denoising Monte Carlo Renderings

    Benedikt Bitterli;Fabrice Rousselle;Bochang Moon;José A. Iglesias-Guitián

  • Unifying points, beams, and paths in volumetric light transport simulation

    Jaroslav Křivánek;Iliyan Georgiev;Toshiya Hachisuka;Petr Vévoda

  • Residual ratio tracking for estimating attenuation in participating media

    Jan Novák;Andrew Selle;Wojciech Jarosz

  • Virtual ray lights for rendering scenes with participating media

    Jan Novák;Derek Nowrouzezahrai;Carsten Dachsbacher;Wojciech Jarosz

  • Radiance caching for participating media

    Wojciech Jarosz;Craig Donner;Matthias Zwicker;Henrik Wann Jensen

  • Physically-based simulation of rainbows

    Iman Sadeghi;Adolfo Munoz;Philip Laven;Wojciech Jarosz

  • Efficient monte carlo methods for light transport in scattering media

    Henrik Wann Jensen;Matthias Zwicker;Wojciech Jarosz

  • Progressive photon beams

    Wojciech Jarosz;Derek Nowrouzezahrai;Robert Thomas;Peter-Pike Sloan

  • Photon beam diffusion: a hybrid Monte Carlo method for subsurface scattering

    Ralf Habel;Per H. Christensen;Wojciech Jarosz

Frequent Co-Authors

Derek Nowrouzezahrai
Derek Nowrouzezahrai McGill University
Henrik Wann Jensen
Henrik Wann Jensen University of California, San Diego
Matthias Zwicker
Matthias Zwicker University of Maryland, College Park
Diego Gutierrez
Diego Gutierrez University of Zaragoza
Markus Gross
Markus Gross ETH Zurich
Wenzel Jakob
Wenzel Jakob École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Carsten Dachsbacher
Carsten Dachsbacher Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Steve Marschner
Steve Marschner Cornell University
Bernd Bickel
Bernd Bickel ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the world of Computer Science in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and career trajectories. Many students get started with an associate's degree, which provides essential foundations and can often be completed quickly and affordably.

For those interested in educational leadership or academic administration, some of the edd programs are now available online, providing flexible pathways for career advancement in higher education settings.

Accreditation remains a key concern—choosing the right program is crucial. The list of online degrees accredited by recognized bodies can help ensure your qualification will be valued by employers.

Finally, tech enthusiasts with a passion for creativity may be interested in the game design masters online offerings, which cater to the booming gaming industry and open new doors in interactive design.

Best Scientists Citing Wojciech Jarosz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles