World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
7247
World Ranking
8048
National Ranking
3457

Pamela Dalton publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela Dalton sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 98 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Pamela Dalton D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela Dalton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pamela Dalton is affiliated with the Monell Chemical Senses Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Medicine, Neuroscience, and Engineering, with a primary focus on Sensory Systems and Biomedical Engineering. Their work explores areas such as Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, and Genetics as well.

The scientist's main research topics cover Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies, Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques, Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments, Respiratory and Cough-Related Research, and Asthma and respiratory diseases.

Among their most frequent publication venues are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Chemical Senses
  • Blood
  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • Function

Frequent co-authors of Pamela Dalton include:

  • Stephanie Hunter
  • Valentina Parma
  • Danielle R. Reed
  • Nancy E. Rawson
  • Kavya Ronanki

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Pamela Dalton include:

  • More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis (2020), published in Chemical Senses
  • E-Cigarettes and Cardiopulmonary Health (2021), published in Function
  • SCENTinel 1.0: Development of a Rapid Test to Screen for Smell Loss (2021), published in Chemical Senses
  • More than smell - COVID-19 is associated with severe impairment of smell, taste, and chemesthesis (2020), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proof-of-concept: SCENTinel 1.1 rapidly discriminates COVID-19-related olfactory disorders (2023), published in Chemical Senses

The breadth of Pamela Dalton's research emphasizes the intersection of chemical senses, sensory impairment, and health-related outcomes, particularly in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. The work frequently appears in venues dedicated to sensory science and biomedical function, reflecting a cross-disciplinary approach.

Best Publications

  • Evaluating the ‘Labeled Magnitude Scale’ for Measuring Sensations of Taste and Smell

    Barry G. Green;Pamela Dalton;Beverly Cowart;Greg Shaffer

  • More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis.

    Valentina Parma;Kathrin Ohla;Maria G Veldhuizen;Masha Y Niv

  • The merging of the senses: integration of subthreshold taste and smell

    P. Dalton;N. Doolittle;H. Nagata;P.A.S. Breslin

  • Effect of Anatomy on Human Nasal Air Flow and Odorant Transport Patterns: Implications for Olfaction

    Kai Zhao;Peter W. Scherer;Shoreh A. Hajiloo;Pamela Dalton

  • Psychophysical and Behavioral Characteristics of Olfactory Adaptation

    Pamela Dalton

  • Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors.

    Pamela Dalton;Nadine Doolittle;Paul A.S. Breslin

  • Odor perception and beliefs about risk.

    Pamela Dalton

  • Numerical modeling of turbulent and laminar airflow and odorant transport during sniffing in the human and rat nose

    Kai Zhao;Pamela Dalton;Geoffery C. Yang;Peter W. Scherer

  • The influence of cognitive bias on the perceived odor, irritation and health symptoms from chemical exposure

    P. Dalton;Charles J. Wysocki;Michael J. Brody;Henry J. Lawley

  • The nature and duration of adaptation following long-term odor exposure

    Pamela Dalton;Charles J. Wysocki

  • Assessment of upper respiratory tract and ocular irritative effects of volatile chemicals in humans.

    Richard L Doty;J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz;Alfredo A Jalowayski;Pamela Dalton

  • The Effect of Emotion and Personality on Olfactory Perception

    Denise Chen;Pamela Dalton

  • Cognitive influences on health symptoms from acute chemical exposure.

    Pamela Dalton

  • Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency.

    Kai Zhao;Jianbo Jiang;Kara Blacker;Brian Lyman

  • Upper airway irritation, odor perception and health risk due to airborne chemicals.

    Pamela Dalton

  • Acetone Odor and Irritation Thresholds Obtained From Acetone-Exposed Factory Workers and From Control (Occupationally Unexposed) Subjects

    Charles J. Wysocki;Pamela Dalton;Michael J. Brody;Henry J. Lawley

  • Perceived odor, irritation, and health symptoms following short-term exposure to acetone.

    Pamela Dalton;Charles J. Wysocki;Michael J. Brody;Henry J. Lawley

  • Odor and Irritation Thresholds for Ammonia: A Comparison between Static and Dynamic Olfactometry

    Monique A.M. Smeets;Patricia J. Bulsing;Sanneke van Rooden;Ranjita Steinmann

  • Numerical modeling of nasal obstruction and endoscopic surgical intervention: outcome to airflow and olfaction.

    Kai Zhao;Edmund A. Pribitkin;Beverly J. Cowart;David Rosen

  • Chemosensory function and response in idiopathic environmental intolerance.

    P Dalton;T Hummel

  • Olfactory assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

    Pamela Dalton;Richard L. Doty;Claire Murphy;Robert Frank

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. S. Breslin
Paul A. S. Breslin Monell Chemical Senses Center
Monique A. M. Smeets
Monique A. M. Smeets Utrecht University
Noam A. Cohen
Noam A. Cohen University of Pennsylvania
Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Richard L. Doty
Richard L. Doty University of Pennsylvania
Julie A. Mennella
Julie A. Mennella Monell Chemical Senses Center
Alan Gelperin
Alan Gelperin Princeton University
Barry G. Green
Barry G. Green Yale University
Johan N. Lundström
Johan N. Lundström Karolinska Institute
Tian Xia
Tian Xia University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Pamela Dalton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles