World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
69
Citations
16915
World Ranking
2632
National Ranking
1243

Linda M. Bartoshuk publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda M. Bartoshuk sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Linda M. Bartoshuk D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda M. Bartoshuk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 2013 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 2003 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1976 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Linda M. Bartoshuk is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within neuroscience, focusing particularly on sensory systems and their biological and chemical underpinnings. Their scholarly output includes studies in the fields of sensory systems, nutrition and dietetics, plant science, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and biochemistry.

The primary research topics covered by Bartoshuk include:

  • Olfactory and sensory function studies
  • Biochemical analysis and sensing techniques
  • Neurobiology and insect physiology research
  • Postharvest quality and shelf life management
  • Berry genetics and cultivation research
  • Phytochemicals and antioxidant activities
  • Advanced chemical sensor technologies

Frequent collaborators in their work are Jeremy M. Wolfe, Dennis M. Levi, Lori L. Holt, Rachel S. Herz, and Daniel M. Merfeld. Bartoshuk has published across several venues including Chemical Senses, Journal of Food Science, Appetite, and Inference International Review of Science.

Recent publications include:

  • "Identifying Treatments for Taste and Smell Disorders: Gaps and Opportunities," 2020, Chemical Senses
  • "Manipulation of sensory characteristics and volatile compounds in strawberry fruit through the use of isolated wavelengths of light," 2020, Journal of Food Science
  • "Volatile-enhanced-sweetness: How to enhance sweet taste in the brain," 2021, Appetite
  • "The Scent of Flavor," 2022, Inference International Review of Science

In addition to journal articles, Bartoshuk has contributed to academic books, with a notable publication titled Sensation & Perception, published by Oxford University Press in 2024.

The recognition of Bartoshuk's contributions to scientific research includes several awards and honors such as the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology in 2019, fellowship status in the American Psychological Association (2018), the William James Fellow Award by the Association for Psychological Science in 2013, election to the National Academy of Sciences in 2003, fellowship of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences since 1995, and fellowship in the American Association for the Advancement of Science since 1976.

Best Publications

  • PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects

    Linda M. Bartoshuk;Valerie B. Duffy;Inglis J. Miller

  • Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.

    L.M Bartoshuk;V.B Duffy;V.B Duffy;B.G Green;H.J Hoffman

  • Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception

    Linda M. Bartoshuk

  • Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake.

    M.E. Dinehart;J.E. Hayes;J.E. Hayes;L.M. Bartoshuk;S.L. Lanier

  • Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives

    Linda M Bartoshuk;Valerie B Duffy;Valerie B Duffy;John E Hayes;Howard R Moskowitz

  • The psychophysics of taste.

    L M Bartoshuk

  • Bitter Receptor Gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) Bitterness and Alcohol Intake

    Valerie B. Duffy;Andrew C. Davidson;Judith R. Kidd;Kenneth K. Kidd

  • The chemical interactions underlying tomato flavor preferences.

    Denise Tieman;Peter Bliss;Lauren M. McIntyre;Adilia Blandon-Ubeda

  • Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste

    L.M Bartoshuk;V.B Duffy;V.B Duffy;K Fast;B.G Green

  • Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.

    Valerie B Duffy;Linda M Bartoshuk

  • Supertasting and PROP Bitterness Depends on More Than the TAS2R38 Gene

    John E. Hayes;Linda M. Bartoshuk;Judith R. Kidd;Valerie B. Duffy

  • Strawberry Flavor: Diverse Chemical Compositions, a Seasonal Influence, and Effects on Sensory Perception

    Michael L. Schwieterman;Thomas A. Colquhoun;Elizabeth A. Jaworski;Linda M. Bartoshuk

  • Taste mixtures: Is mixture suppression related to compression?

    Linda M. Bartoshuk

  • Mutual action of taste and olfaction.

    Claire Murphy;William S. Cain;Linda M. Bartoshuk

  • Bitter Taste of Saccharin Related to the Genetic Ability to Taste the Bitter Substance 6-n-Propylthiouracil

    Linda M. Bartoshuk

  • Children's food preferences and genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP).

    J A Anliker;L Bartoshuk;A M Ferris;L D Hooks

  • Taste and Aging

    L. M. Bartoshuk;B. Rifkin;L. E. Marks;P. Bars

  • The biological basis of food perception and acceptance

    Linda M. Bartoshuk

  • Capsaicin desensitization and recovery on the human tongue

    Tracy Karrer;Linda Bartoshuk

  • Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.

    John E. Hayes;Margaret R. Wallace;Valerie S. Knopik;Deborah M. Herbstman

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles A. Sims
Charles A. Sims University of Florida
William S. Cain
William S. Cain University of California, San Diego
Lawrence E. Marks
Lawrence E. Marks Yale University
Judith R. Kidd
Judith R. Kidd Yale University
Roger B. Fillingim
Roger B. Fillingim University of Florida
Howard R. Moskowitz
Howard R. Moskowitz United States Department of the Army
Harry J. Klee
Harry J. Klee University of Florida
Howard J. Hoffman
Howard J. Hoffman National Institutes of Health
Kenneth K. Kidd
Kenneth K. Kidd Yale University
Nicholas J. Timpson
Nicholas J. Timpson University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscience students benefit from understanding related fields and the flexible education pathways available online. For those interested in clinical psychology, pursuing online psyd programs accredited by apa can lead to a doctorate-level qualification with strong credentials. Another popular career route is marriage and family therapy, which can be accessed through online mft programs designed for accelerated learning and licensure preparation.

If you’re considering a foundation in science or psychology, an online bachelor's degree offers flexibility and the ability to finish your studies faster. Many students use these programs as a stepping stone to graduate school or professional work in neuroscience-related fields.

Thinking ahead about job prospects? It’s smart to be aware of the top degrees in the world for earning potential. Degrees in neuroscience, psychology, and the health sciences consistently rank well, opening doors to high-growth, high-impact careers.

Best Scientists Citing Linda M. Bartoshuk

Trending Scientists