World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
6916
World Ranking
5835
National Ranking
166

David G. Laing publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Laing sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David G. Laing D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Laing sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David G. Laing is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their recent research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields incorporating sensory systems, biomedical engineering, nutrition and dietetics, emergency medical services, and sociology and political science.

The main topics covered in their work involve olfactory and sensory function studies, advanced chemical sensor technologies, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, global health workforce issues, cultural competency in health care, and global health and surgery.

Among the recent papers authored by David G. Laing are:

  • Chemosensory Loss during a Traumatic Brain Injury Suggests a Central Pathway for the Rehabilitation of Anosmia (2021), published in Chemical Senses
  • The challenges and needs of international nurses who are assimilating to healthcare systems in the United Kingdom: Experience from the field (2024), published in International Nursing Review

Frequent coauthors in their research include Adrienne Epps, Anthony L Jinks, and Analisa Smythe. Their work has appeared predominantly in the journals Chemical Senses and International Nursing Review.

Best Publications

  • The capacity of humans to identify odors in mixtures

    David G. Laing;G. W. Francis

  • Infants' Consumption of a New Food Enhances Acceptance of Similar Foods

    Leann L. Birch;Lisa Gunder;Karen Grimm-Thomas;David G. Laing

  • Natural Sniffing Gives Optimum Odour Perception for Humans

    David G Laing

  • Quality and intensity of binary odor mixtures

    D.G. Laing;H. Panhuber;M.E. Willcox;E.A. Pittman

  • Influence of training and experience on the perception of multicomponent odor mixtures.

    Andrew Livermore;David G. Laing

  • The analysis of odor mixtures by humans : evidence for a configurational process

    Anthony L Jinks;David G. Laing

  • The human sense of smell

    David G. Laing;Richard L. Doty;Winrich Breipohl

  • Odour mixture suppression: evidence for a peripheral mechanism in human and rat.

    Graham A. Bell;David G. Laing;Helmut Panhuber

  • A limit in the processing of components in odour mixtures.

    Anthony Jinks;David G Laing

  • Rapid quantitative assessment of fungiform papillae density in the human tongue.

    Maryam Shahbake;Ian Hutchinson;David G. Laing;David G. Laing;Anthony L. Jinks

  • A Comparison of the Ability of 8–9-Year-Old Children and Adults to Detect Taste Stimuli

    Catherine E. James;David G. Laing;Nicholas Oram

  • The influence of odor type on the discrimination and identification of odorants in multicomponent odor mixtures.

    Andrew Livermore;D.G. Laing

  • A quantitative study of fungiform papillae and taste pore density in adults and children.

    Carolina Segovia;Ian Hutchinson;David G Laing;Anthony L Jinks

  • Relationship between molecular structure, concentration and odor qualities of oxygenated aliphatic molecules.

    David G. Laing;Prem Legha;Anthony L Jinks;Ian Hutchinson

  • The influence of chemical complexity on the perception of multicomponent odor mixtures.

    Andrew Livermore;David G. Laing

  • Perception of components in binary odour mixtures

    D.G. Laing;M.E. Willcox

  • Selective attention and the perceptual analysis of odor mixtures.

    D.G. Laing;A. Glemarec

  • Olfactory function in children assessed with psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques.

    Thomas Hummel;Moustafa Bensafi;Julia Nikolaus;Michael Knecht

  • Flavour perception mechanisms

    David G. Laing;Anthony Jinks

  • Perceptual characteristics of binary, trinary, and quaternary odor mixtures consisting of unpleasant constituents

    David G. Laing;Andrew Eddy;D. John Best

Frequent Co-Authors

Burton M. Slotnick
Burton M. Slotnick American University
Alan Mackay-Sim
Alan Mackay-Sim Griffith University
Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Richard L. Doty
Richard L. Doty University of Pennsylvania
John F. Prescott
John F. Prescott University of Guelph
Benoist Schaal
Benoist Schaal University of Burgundy
Claire E. Wakefield
Claire E. Wakefield University of New South Wales
Steven Nordin
Steven Nordin Umeå University
Garth A. Nicholson
Garth A. Nicholson University of Sydney
Hely Tuorila
Hely Tuorila University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David G. Laing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles