World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthias Laska

Matthias Laska

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
6196
World Ranking
7004
National Ranking
144

Matthias Laska publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Laska sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 154 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Matthias Laska D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Laska sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias Laska is affiliated with Linköping University in Sweden and has a research focus spanning neuroscience and psychology, with 19 publications in the former and 12 in the latter. Their work concentrates on multiple subfields including sensory systems, social psychology, nutrition and dietetics, endocrine and autonomic systems, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The scholar's research topics cover a range of areas such as olfactory and sensory function studies, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, primate behavior and ecology, regulation of appetite and obesity, neurobiology and insect physiology research, animal behavior and reproduction, and animal nutrition and physiology.

Recent significant papers include:

  • "Olfactory-based interspecific recognition of human emotions: Horses (Equus ferus caballus) can recognize fear and happiness body odour from humans (Homo sapiens)", 2020, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • "Food preferences and nutrient composition in zoo-housed ring-tailed lemurs, Lemur catta", 2020, Physiology & Behavior
  • "Does the number of functional olfactory receptor genes predict olfactory sensitivity and discrimination performance in mammals?", 2024, Journal of Evolutionary Biology
  • "Non-visual senses in fruit selection by the mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata)", 2022, Primates
  • "Taste responsiveness of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and black-handed spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) to eight substances tasting sweet to humans", 2021, Physiology & Behavior

Their frequent coauthors include Laura Teresa Hernández Salazar, Karem G. Sánchez-Solano, Jorge É. Morales-Mávil, Carlos Eduardo Ramírez Torres, and José Eduardo Reynoso-Cruz. The collaboration record shows particularly extensive coauthorship with Laura Teresa Hernández Salazar, featuring 13 joint publications.

Matthias Laska's research is published in diverse scientific journals, with multiple contributions to Primates, Physiology & Behavior, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Behavioural Processes, and PeerJ.

Best Publications

  • Differences in Perception of Everyday Odors: a Japanese-German Cross-cultural Study

    Saho Ayabe-Kanamura;Ina Schicker;Matthias Laska;Robyn Hudson

  • Odor Identification, Consistency of Label Use, Olfactory Threshold and their Relationships to Odor Memory over the Human Lifespan

    Johann P. Lehrner;Judith Glück;Matthias Laska

  • 'Microsmatic' primates revisited: olfactory sensitivity in the squirrel monkey.

    Matthias Laska;Alexandra Seibt;Andreas Weber

  • Trigeminal Perception of Odorant Quality in Congenitally Anosmic Subjects

    M. Laska;H. Distel;R. Hudson;R. Hudson

  • Olfactory Discrimination Ability and Odor Structure–Activity Relationships in Honeybees

    Matthias Laska;C. Giovanni Galizia;Martin Giurfa;Randolf Menzel

  • Olfactory Discrimination Ability of Human Subjects for Ten Pairs of Enantiomers

    Matthias Laska;Peter Teubner

  • A comparison of the detection thresholds of odour mixtures and their components

    Matthias Laska;Robyn Hudson

  • Olfactory discrimination ability for homologous series of aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes

    Matthias Laska;Peter Teubner

  • Odor structure-activity relationships of carboxylic acids correspond between squirrel monkeys and humans

    Matthias Laska;Peter Teubner

  • Discriminating parts from the whole: determinants of odor mixture perception in squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus.

    M. Laska;R. Hudson

  • Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic alcohols in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques.

    Matthias Laska;Alexandra Seibt

  • Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and humans.

    Matthias Laska;Daniela Freyer

  • Olfactory sensitivity to food odor components in the short-tailed fruit bat, Carollia perspicillata (Phyllostomatidae, Chiroptera)

    Matthias Laska

  • Olfactory Discrimination Ability of Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) for Structurally Related Odorants

    Alisa Rizvanovic;Mats Amundin;Matthias Laska

  • Which senses play a role in nonhuman primate food selection? A comparison between squirrel monkeys and spider monkeys

    Matthias Laska;Pamela Freist;Stephanie Krause

  • Unilateral olfactory perception and magical ideation

    Christine Mohr;Christina Maria Röhrenbach;Matthias Laska;Peter Brugger

  • Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques.

    Matthias Laska;Alexandra Seibt

  • Enantioselectivity of odor perception in squirrel monkeys and humans

    Matthias Laska;Anne Liesen;Peter Teubner

  • Detecting danger—or just another odorant? Olfactory sensitivity for the fox odor component 2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline in four species of mammals

    Matthias Laska;Markus Fendt;Alexandra Wieser;Thomas Endres

  • The Number of Functional Olfactory Receptor Genes and the Relative Size of Olfactory Brain Structures Are Poor Predictors of Olfactory Discrimination Performance with Enantiomers

    Matthias Laska;Daria Genzel;Alexandra Wieser

Frequent Co-Authors

Robyn Hudson
Robyn Hudson National Autonomous University of Mexico
Gordon M. Shepherd
Gordon M. Shepherd Yale School of Medicine
Johan N. Lundström
Johan N. Lundström Karolinska Institute
Christine Mohr
Christine Mohr University of Lausanne
Desire L. Massart
Desire L. Massart Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Travis Rayne Pickering
Travis Rayne Pickering University of Wisconsin–Madison
Peter Brugger
Peter Brugger University of Zurich
Manfred Ayasse
Manfred Ayasse University of Ulm
C. Giovanni Galizia
C. Giovanni Galizia University of Konstanz
Per Jensen
Per Jensen Linköping University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Laska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles