World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7273 6782 81 78 200 7524

Christine Mohr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christine Mohr between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christine Mohr published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2014. 5 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2014. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1999 2025

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christine Mohr: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 4
2002 3
2003 7
2004 4
2005 11
2006 5
2007 8
2008 3
2009 4
2010 4
2011 7
2012 12
2013 16
2014 23
2015 20
2016 15
2017 8
2018 11
2019 10
2020 11
2021 9
2022 5
2023 7
2024 2
2025 3
Total 213
Download as CSV

Christine Mohr publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Mohr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 200 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 200
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Christine Mohr D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Mohr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Christine Mohr is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple domains within psychology and neuroscience, focusing on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as social psychology. A significant portion of their work also contributes to the understanding of cognitive neuroscience and sensory systems.

Their research topics include:

  • Color perception and design
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Olfactory and sensory function studies
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • COVID-19 clinical research studies

Notable recent publications by Christine Mohr include:

  • "EEG microstates are a candidate endophenotype for schizophrenia" (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • "Universal Patterns in Color-Emotion Associations Are Further Shaped by Linguistic and Geographic Proximity" (2020), published in Psychological Science
  • "Feeling Blue or Seeing Red? Similar Patterns of Emotion Associations With Colour Patches and Colour Terms" (2020), published in i-Perception
  • "Comparison of characteristics, predictors and outcomes between the first and second COVID-19 waves in a tertiary care centre in Switzerland: an observational analysis" (2021), published in Swiss Medical Weekly
  • "English colour terms carry gender and valence biases: A corpus study using word embeddings" (2021), published in PLoS ONE

Frequent coauthors in their body of work include:

  • Domicelė Jonauskaitė
  • Déborah Epicoco
  • Éric Laurent
  • Mari Uusküla
  • Giulia F. M. Spagnulo

Christine Mohr's work has been featured in several recurring publication venues, including:

  • Color Research & Application
  • i-Perception
  • PLoS ONE
  • Nature Communications
  • Psychological Science

Their contributions to psychology and neuroscience involve exploring various perceptual and cognitive processes, with emphasis on how sensory integration and categorization influence human experience. The integration of EEG and brain-computer interface methodologies in some studies reflects interdisciplinary approaches combining neuroscience with experimental psychology.

Best Publications

  • Linking Out-of-Body Experience and Self Processing to Mental Own-Body Imagery at the Temporoparietal Junction

    Olaf Blanke;Christine Mohr;Christoph M Michel;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area

    Shahar Arzy;Gregor Thut;Christine Mohr;Christoph M. Michel

  • Out-of-body experience, heautoscopy, and autoscopic hallucination of neurological origin Implications for neurocognitive mechanisms of corporeal awareness and self-consciousness

    Olaf Blanke;Christine Mohr

  • Cognition and brain function in schizotypy: a selective review.

    Ulrich Ettinger;Christine Mohr;Diane C. Gooding;Alex S. Cohen

  • Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words.

    Stephanie Ortigue;Christoph M Michel;Micah M Murray;Christine Mohr

  • Associative processing and paranormal belief

    Lorena R. R. Gianotti;Christine Mohr;Diego Pizzagalli;Dietrich Lehmann

  • EEG microstates are a candidate endophenotype for schizophrenia.

    Janir Ramos da Cruz;Janir Ramos da Cruz;Ophélie Favrod;Maya Roinishvili;Eka Chkonia

  • Schizotypy—Do Not Worry, It Is Not All Worrisome

    Christine Mohr;Gordon Claridge

  • Loose but normal: a semantic association study.

    Christine Mohr;Roger E. Graves;Lorena R. R. Gianotti;Diego Pizzagalli

  • Motor control and cerebral hemispheric specialization in highly qualified judo wrestlers.

    Maxim Mikheev;Christine Mohr;Sergei Afanasiev;Theodor Landis

  • Schizotypy as an organizing framework for social and affective sciences.

    Alex S. Cohen;Christine Mohr;Ulrich Ettinger;Raymond C. K. Chan

  • Dopamine, paranormal belief, and the detection of meaningful stimuli

    Peter Krummenacher;Christine Mohr;Helene Haker;Peter Brugger

  • Psychometric schizotypy modulates levodopa effects on lateralized lexical decision performance.

    Christine Mohr;Peter Krummenacher;Theodor Landis;Peter S. Sandor

  • Opposite turning behavior in right-handers and non-right-handers suggests a link between handedness and cerebral dopamine asymmetries.

    C Mohr;T Landis;HS Bracha;P Brugger

  • Sex-related differences in vision are heterogeneous

    Albulena Shaqiri;Maya Roinishvili;Lukasz Grzeczkowski;Eka Chkonia

  • The paranormal mind: How the study of anomalous experiences and beliefs may inform cognitive neuroscience

    Peter Brugger;Christine Mohr

  • Hyperfamiliarity for unknown faces after left lateral temporo-occipital venous infarction: a double dissociation with prosopagnosia.

    Patrik Vuilleumier;Christine Mohr;Nathalie Valenza;Corinne Wetzel

  • Magical ideation modulates spatial behavior.

    Christine Mohr;H. Stefan Bracha;Peter Brugger

  • Unilateral olfactory perception and magical ideation

    Christine Mohr;Christina Maria Röhrenbach;Matthias Laska;Peter Brugger

  • The influence of sex and empathy on putting oneself in the shoes of others

    Christine Mohr;Angela C. Rowe;Olaf Blanke

  • Mentalizing skills do not differentiate believers from non-believers, but credibility enhancing displays do.

    David L. R. Maij;Frenk van Harreveld;Will M. Gervais;Yann Schrag

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael H. Herzog
Michael H. Herzog École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Peter Brugger
Peter Brugger University of Zurich
Theodor Landis
Theodor Landis University of Geneva
Olaf Blanke
Olaf Blanke École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Gustav Kuhn
Gustav Kuhn Plymouth University
Rhiannon Corcoran
Rhiannon Corcoran University of Liverpool
Christoph M. Michel
Christoph M. Michel University of Geneva
Richard Drake
Richard Drake University of Manchester
Jonathan Evans
Jonathan Evans University of Glasgow
Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology in the USA unlocks a variety of career opportunities—many of which are accessible through online programs. Popular pathways include clinical psychology, counseling, social work, and especially substance abuse counseling. These professions often require a blend of academic credentials and hands-on training, and requirements vary by state and city.

For those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Spokane, you’ll need to understand unique regional licensing rules and supervised experience requirements. If you plan to serve in a larger metropolitan area, the St. Louis substance abuse counselors education requirements offer another example of how criteria can differ. Likewise, the specific substance abuse counselor requirements in St. Petersburg highlight the importance of checking local standards before applying to a program.

Some regions, such as those focusing on becoming a substance abuse counselor in Stockton, may emphasize different aspects of education or clinical practice. Researching each location closely and choosing accredited online degrees will help ensure you meet the required qualifications wherever you launch your career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Christine Mohr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles