World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 84 1228 1082 148 136 325 26265

Jonathan Evans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Evans between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Evans published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2013. 34 of the 460 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2013. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 36 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 13 publications
1991 2025

460 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Evans: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 6
1997 3
1998 2
1999 4
2000 12
2001 7
2002 6
2003 15
2004 6
2005 9
2006 9
2007 8
2008 13
2009 27
2010 18
2011 18
2012 16
2013 38
2014 36
2015 18
2016 24
2017 24
2018 23
2019 13
2020 22
2021 23
2022 12
2023 9
2024 21
2025 13
Total 460
Download as CSV

Jonathan Evans publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Evans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 325 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 325
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Evans D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Evans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 84
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan Evans is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, and Oncology.

The main topics of Jonathan Evans's work cover several areas of clinical and cognitive research:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Jonathan Evans include:

  • "Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies" (2020), published in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "Assessment of Neurocognitive Functions, Olfaction, Taste, Mental, and Psychosocial Health in COVID-19 in Adults: Recommendations for Harmonization of Research and Implications for Clinical Practice" (2021), published in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • "Social isolation after acquired brain injury: Exploring the relationship between network size, functional support, loneliness and mental health" (2021), published in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • "The need for reporting guidelines for early phase dose-finding trials: Dose-Finding CONSORT Extension" (2022), published in Nature Medicine
  • "Working memory updating training promotes plasticity & behavioural gains: A systematic review & meta-analysis" (2020), published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Jonathan Evans frequently collaborates with several researchers in their field. Key co-authors include:

  • Breda Cullen
  • Heather McClelland
  • Alasdair M. J. MacLullich
  • Zoë Tieges
  • Rory C. O'Connor

Their work is often published in specific academic venues and journals where they have multiple contributions. These publication venues include:

  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • Clinical Rehabilitation

Best Publications

  • Cohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth

    Jonathan Evans;Jon Heron;Helen Francomb;Sarah Oke

  • The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample.

    Jonathan Heron;Thomas G O'Connor;Jonathan Evans;Jean Golding

  • Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome

    Barbara A. Wilson;Jonathan J. Evans;Nick Alderman;Paul W. Burgess

  • The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement†

    Robyn L. Tate;Michael Perdices;Ulrike Rosenkoetter;William Shadish

  • A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment

    Breda Cullen;Brian O'Neill;Jonathan J Evans;Robert F Coen

  • Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people

    Barbara A. Wilson;Alan Baddeley;Jonathan Evans;Agnes Shiel

  • Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: A randomised control crossover study

    B A Wilson;H C Emslie;K Quirk;J J Evans

  • Progressive prosopagnosia associated with selective right temporal lobe atrophy. A new syndrome

    J. J. Evans;A. J. Heggs;N. Antoun;J. R. Hodges

  • Genome-wide association study of cognitive functions and educational attainment in UK Biobank ( N =112 151)

    G. Davies;R. E. Marioni;R. E. Marioni;D. C. Liewald;W. D. Hill

  • Prevalence and characteristics of probable major depression and bipolar disorder within UK biobank: cross-sectional study of 172,751 participants

    Daniel J Smith;Barbara I. Nicholl;Breda Cullen;Daniel Martin

  • Common variation in the DIO2 gene predicts baseline psychological well-being and response to combination thyroxine plus triiodothyronine therapy in hypothyroid patients.

    Vijay Panicker;Ponnusamy Saravanan;Ponnusamy Saravanan;Bijay Vaidya;Jonathan Evans

  • The Development of an Ecologically Valid Test for Assessing Patients with a Dysexecutive Syndrome

    Barbara A. Wilson;Jonathan J. Evans;Hazel Emslie;Nick Alderman

  • Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

    Heather McClelland;Jonathan J. Evans;Rebecca Nowland;Eamonn Ferguson

  • Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid

    Barbara A Wilson;Jonathan J Evans;Hazel Emslie;Vlastimil Malinek

  • Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide.

    Agata Krasny-Pacini;Jonathan Evans

  • A Comparison of ''Errorless'' and ''Trial-and-error'' Learning Methods for Teaching Individuals with Acquired Memory Deficits

    Jonathan J. Evans;Barbara A. Wilson;Uwe Schuri;Jackie Andrade

  • Previous prenatal loss as a predictor of perinatal depression and anxiety

    Emma Robertson Blackmore;Denise Côté-Arsenault;Wan Tang;Vivette Glover

  • The effects of pre- and postnatal depression in fathers: a natural experiment comparing the effects of exposure to depression on offspring

    Paul G Ramchandani;Thomas G O'Connor;Jonathan Evans;Jon E Heron

  • Association of Adult Body Mass Index and Height with Anxiety, Depression, and Suicide in the General Population The HUNT Study

    Ottar Bjerkeset;Ottar Bjerkeset;Pål Romundstad;Jonathan Evans;David Gunnell

  • Cognitive Test Scores in UK Biobank: Data Reduction in 480,416 Participants and Longitudinal Stability in 20,346 Participants.

    Donald M Lyall;Breda Cullen;Michael Allerhand;Daniel J Smith

  • Assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome in schizophrenia

    J. J. Evans;S. E. Chua;P. J. McKENNA;B. A. Wilson

  • Evidence, lack of evidence, controversy, and debate in the provision and performance of the surgery of acute type A aortic dissection

    Robert S. Bonser;Robert S. Bonser;Aaron M. Ranasinghe;Aaron M. Ranasinghe;Mahmoud Loubani;Jonathan D. Evans

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara A. Wilson
Barbara A. Wilson St George's, University of London
David Gunnell
David Gunnell University of Bristol
Keith Hawton
Keith Hawton University of Oxford
Navneet Kapur
Navneet Kapur University of Manchester
Jill P. Pell
Jill P. Pell University of Glasgow
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London
Daniel J. Smith
Daniel J. Smith University of Edinburgh
Jon Heron
Jon Heron University of Bristol
David J. Stott
David J. Stott University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA can pave the way to diverse careers, particularly in fields like counseling, therapy, and social work. Many students opt for related online degrees in Social Work, Counseling, or Human Services, which offer flexibility and can help meet state-specific professional licensing requirements.

Each U.S. state has unique criteria for becoming a licensed social worker. For example, Ohio social work license requirements include completing an accredited degree program and passing exams. In Oklahoma, Oklahoma social work license requirements require applicants to undergo supervised practice hours in addition to their degree.

If you plan to practice in the Pacific Northwest, you should learn more about becoming a social worker in Oregon, where graduate education and clinical experience play a key role. Likewise, the requirements to be a social worker in Pennsylvania stress both education and examination.

Exploring these online degree options and understanding state-specific pathways will help prepare you for a fulfilling career in psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Evans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles