World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
76
Citations
25089
World Ranking
1335
National Ranking
702

Anthony Stentz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Stentz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 266 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anthony Stentz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Stentz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony Stentz is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with particular attention to subfields such as Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Developmental Biology, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics that include Speech and Audio Processing, Music and Audio Processing, Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior, Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Speech and Dialogue Systems, and AI-based Problem Solving and Planning.

Among recent publications, two papers illustrate the scope and variety of Anthony Stentz's research contributions:

  • Multiclass Terrain Classification using Sound and Vibration from Mobile Robot Terrain Interaction, 2021, presented at the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • Language Understanding for Field and Service Robots in a Priori Unknown Environments, 2021, published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators include Jacqueline Libby, Matthew R. Walter, Siddharth Patki, Andrea F. Daniele, and Ethan Fahnestock, reflecting a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach to their research.

Anthony Stentz's publications have appeared in venues such as the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) and arXiv (Cornell University), suggesting active engagement with both conference proceedings and preprint archives.

Best Publications

  • Autonomous driving in urban environments: Boss and the Urban Challenge

    Chris Urmson;Joshua Anhalt;Drew Bagnell;Christopher Baker

  • Optimal and efficient path planning for partially-known environments

    A. Stentz

  • The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning

    Anthony Stentz

  • Market-Based Multirobot Coordination: A Survey and Analysis

    M.B. Dias;R. Zlot;N. Kalra;A. Stentz

  • Multi-robot exploration controlled by a market economy

    R. Zlot;A. Stentz;M.B. Dias;S. Thayer

  • Anytime dynamic A*: an anytime, replanning algorithm

    Maxim Likhachev;Dave Ferguson;Geoff Gordon;Anthony Stentz

  • A comprehensive taxonomy for multi-robot task allocation

    G. Ayorkor Korsah;Anthony Stentz;M. Bernardine Dias

  • Using interpolation to improve path planning: The Field D* algorithm

    Dave Ferguson;Anthony Stentz

  • Optimal and Efficient Path Planning for Unknown and Dynamic Environments

    Anthony Stentz

  • A Robotic Excavator for Autonomous Truck Loading

    Anthony Stentz;John Bares;Sanjiv Singh;Patrick Rowe

  • A complete navigation system for goal acquisition in unknown environments

    A. Stentz;M. Hebert

  • Replanning with RRTs

    D. Ferguson;N. Kalra;A. Stentz

  • Recent progress in local and global traversability for planetary rovers

    S. Singh;R. Simmons;T. Smith;A. Stentz

  • Field D*: An Interpolation-Based Path Planner and Replanner

    Dave Ferguson;Anthony Stentz

  • Toward Reliable Off Road Autonomous Vehicles Operating in Challenging Environments

    Alonzo Kelly;Anthony Stentz;Omead Amidi;Mike Bode

  • A Guide to Heuristic-based Path Planning

    Dave Ferguson;Maxim Likhachev;Anthony Stentz

  • A Free Market Architecture for Distributed Control of a Multirobot System

    M. Bernardine Dias;Anthony Stentz

  • Anytime search in dynamic graphs

    Maxim Likhachev;Dave Ferguson;Geoff Gordon;Anthony Stentz

  • Market-based Multirobot Coordination for Complex Tasks

    Robert Zlot;Anthony Stentz

  • First results in robot road-following

    Richard Wallace;Anthony Stentz;Charles Thorpe;Hans Maravec

Frequent Co-Authors

Martial Hebert
Martial Hebert Carnegie Mellon University
Alonzo Kelly
Alonzo Kelly Carnegie Mellon University
J. Andrew Bagnell
J. Andrew Bagnell Carnegie Mellon University
Sanjiv Singh
Sanjiv Singh Carnegie Mellon University
William Whittaker
William Whittaker Carnegie Mellon University
Maxim Likhachev
Maxim Likhachev Carnegie Mellon University
Charles E. Thorpe
Charles E. Thorpe Carnegie Mellon University
Reid Simmons
Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon University
Sebastian Thrun
Sebastian Thrun Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology continues to shape the job market, exploring alternative pathways in computer science is more popular than ever. Many students now consider fastest online degree options to quickly enter high-demand tech careers. These accelerated programs can help you gain practical skills and start earning sooner.

For those interested in cutting-edge fields, degrees in ai are becoming increasingly valuable. Artificial intelligence impacts everything from healthcare to finance, making AI expertise a sought-after asset for the future workforce.

Choosing a major is also crucial. Many students look for guidance on the top 10 best majors for the future to align their education with promising career prospects. With online learning, you can customize your education while balancing other responsibilities.

Interested in further advancement? Consider pursuing the easiest masters degree to get online for career growth without putting your current work on hold. These online degrees open doors to leadership roles in a flexible and accessible way.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony Stentz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles