World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
USA
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
96
Citations
37493
World Ranking
437
National Ranking
242

Peter Stone publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Stone sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 756 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter Stone D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Stone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Peter Stone is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on the intersection of computer science, artificial intelligence, and robotics.

The main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

Their research delves into significant subfields of computer science, such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Social Psychology

Key topics addressed in their work feature:

  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI

Among their recent papers are the following notable publications:

  • "Outracing champion Gran Turismo drivers with deep reinforcement learning," 2022, Nature
  • "Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Framework and Survey," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Motion planning and control for mobile robot navigation using machine learning: a survey," 2022, Autonomous Robots
  • "A Lifelong Learning Approach to Mobile Robot Navigation," 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "Coopernaut: End-to-End Driving with Cooperative Perception for Networked Vehicles," 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter Stone include:

  • Xuesu Xiao
  • Garrett Warnell
  • Haresh Karnan
  • Joydeep Biswas
  • Zizhao Wang

Their research is regularly published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Autonomous Robots
  • 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Best Publications

  • Transfer Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Survey

    Matthew E. Taylor;Peter Stone

  • Multiagent Systems: A Survey from a Machine Learning Perspective

    Peter Stone;Manuela Veloso

  • Efficacy of climate forcings

    J. Hansen;J. Hansen;M. Sato;R. Ruedy;L. Nazarenko

  • Climate Sensitivity: Analysis of Feedback Mechanisms

    J. Hansen;A. Lacis;D. Rind;G. Russell

  • A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management

    Kurt Dresner;Peter Stone

  • Efficient Three-Dimensional Global Models for Climate Studies: Models I and II

    J. Hansen;G. Russell;D. Rind;P. Stone

  • Global climate changes as forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies three-dimensional model

    J. Hansen;I. Fung;A. Lacis;D. Rind

  • Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data

    Gavin A. Schmidt;Reto Ruedy;James E. Hansen;Igor Aleinov

  • Policy gradient reinforcement learning for fast quadrupedal locomotion

    N. Kohl;P. Stone

  • Layered Learning in Multiagent Systems: A Winning Approach to Robotic Soccer

    Peter Stone

  • Earth system models of intermediate complexity: closing the gap in the spectrum of climate system models

    M. Claussen;LA Mysak;AJ Weaver;Michel Crucifix

  • Multiagent Traffic Management: A Reservation-Based Intersection Control Mechanism

    Kurt Dresner;Peter Stone

  • Layered Learning

    Peter Stone;Manuela M. Veloso

  • Task decomposition, dynamic role assignment, and low-bandwidth communication for real-time strategic teamwork

    Peter Stone;Manuela Veloso

  • Quantifying Uncertainties in Climate System Properties with the Use of Recent Climate Observations

    Chris E. Forest;Peter H. Stone;Andrei P. Sokolov;Myles R. Allen

  • The RoboCup Synthetic Agent Challenge 97

    Hiroaki Kitano;Milind Tambe;Peter Stone;Manuela M. Veloso

  • Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol

    John M. Reilly;Ronald G. Prinn;Jochen. Harnisch;Jean. Fitzmaurice

  • Outracing champion Gran Turismo drivers with deep reinforcement learning

    Unknown

  • Interactively shaping agents via human reinforcement: the TAMER framework

    W. Bradley Knox;Peter Stone

  • A Simplified Radiative-Dynamical Model for the Static Stability of Rotating Atmospheres

    Peter H. Stone

  • On Non-Geostrophic Baroclinic Stability

    Peter H. Stone

  • Autonomous Agents Modelling Other Agents: A Comprehensive Survey and Open Problems

    Stefano V. Albrecht;Peter Stone

  • Climate forcings in Goddard Institute for Space Studies SI2000 simulations

    J. Hansen;M. Sato;M. Sato;L. Nazarenko;L. Nazarenko;R. Ruedy

  • Multiagent traffic management: an improved intersection control mechanism

    Kurt Dresner;Peter Stone

  • Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPs

    Matthew Hausknecht;Peter Stone

  • Ad hoc autonomous agent teams: collaboration without pre-coordination

    Peter Stone;Gal A. Kaminka;Sarit Kraus;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Evolutionary Function Approximation for Reinforcement Learning

    Shimon Whiteson;Peter Stone

  • Layered learning in multiagent systems

    Peter Stone

  • PAC Subset Selection in Stochastic Multi-armed Bandits

    Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan;Ambuj Tewari;Peter Auer;Peter Stone

  • Auction-based autonomous intersection management

    Dustin Carlino;Stephen D. Boyles;Peter Stone

  • Transfer Learning via Inter-Task Mappings for Temporal Difference Learning

    Matthew E. Taylor;Peter Stone;Yaxin Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Manuela Veloso
Manuela Veloso Carnegie Mellon University
Shimon Whiteson
Shimon Whiteson University of Oxford
Michael P. Wellman
Michael P. Wellman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sarit Kraus
Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University
Raymond J. Mooney
Raymond J. Mooney The University of Texas at Austin
Minoru Asada
Minoru Asada Osaka University
Michael L. Littman
Michael L. Littman Brown University
Tucker Balch
Tucker Balch Emory University
Satinder Singh
Satinder Singh DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Risto Miikkulainen
Risto Miikkulainen The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degree options and career pathways. From emerging fields to specialized management, online programs make advanced education accessible and flexible for busy students and professionals.

Those interested in the digital finance revolution can consider a masters in crypto. This degree is ideal for tech enthusiasts wanting to build expertise in blockchain, cryptocurrency, and fintech sectors.

For individuals who have a passion for both sports and business, a sports management degree online offers a fast-track way into sports marketing, event management, and facility operations—often with accelerated options.

Urban growth and modernization have also spurred the demand for skilled planners. With urban planning masters programs online, students can specialize in community development, environmental design, and infrastructure planning.

If time is of the essence, you may want to look into 6 month master's degree online programs. These intensive programs allow professionals to enhance their credentials or shift career directions quickly.

Whatever your background, online degrees in these fields offer flexible, practical ways to advance your education and career in today's dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles