World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
4955
World Ranking
8440
National Ranking
3010

Lawrence E. Hipps publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence E. Hipps sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Lawrence E. Hipps D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence E. Hipps sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence E. Hipps is affiliated with Utah State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a significant number of publications contributing to these fields.

The scientist's subfields of study include global and planetary change, plant science, ecology, environmental engineering, and water science and technology. These areas reflect a broad engagement with environmental processes and their applications in natural and managed ecosystems.

The main topics covered by Lawrence E. Hipps's work involve plant water relations and carbon dynamics, horticultural and viticultural research, remote sensing in agriculture, hydrology and watershed management studies, irrigation practices and water management, urban heat island mitigation, and soil and unsaturated flow. This range indicates a strong emphasis on understanding and managing water and carbon fluxes within agricultural and environmental contexts.

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include William P. Kustas, Joseph G. Alfieri, John H. Prueger, L. McKee, and María Mar Alsina. These recurring partnerships suggest involvement in multidisciplinary and collaborative research efforts.

The scientist has published extensively in several venues, most notably in Irrigation Science with 15 publications, followed by Remote Sensing with 4, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology with 3, HydroShare Resources with 3, and Environmental Research Letters with 2 publications.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Direct partitioning of eddy-covariance water and carbon dioxide fluxes into ground and plant components, 2022, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Assessing Daily Evapotranspiration Methodologies from One-Time-of-Day sUAS and EC Information in the GRAPEX Project, 2021, Remote Sensing
  • Evapotranspiration uncertainty at micrometeorological scales: the impact of the eddy covariance energy imbalance and correction methods, 2022, Irrigation Science
  • Improving the spatiotemporal resolution of remotely sensed ET information for water management through Landsat, Sentinel-2, ECOSTRESS and VIIRS data fusion, 2022, Irrigation Science
  • Influence of Model Grid Size on the Estimation of Surface Fluxes Using the Two Source Energy Balance Model and sUAS Imagery in Vineyards, 2020, Remote Sensing

Best Publications

  • Probable causes of the abnormal ridge accompanying the 2013–2014 California drought: ENSO precursor and anthropogenic warming footprint

    S.‐Y. Simon Wang;Lawrence Hipps;Robert R Gillies;Jin‐Ho Yoon

  • Increasing water cycle extremes in California and in relation to ENSO cycle under global warming

    Jin Ho Yoon;S. Y. Simon Wang;Robert R. Gillies;Benjamin S. Kravitz

  • Variability in soil heat flux from a mesquite dune site.

    William P Kustas;John H Prueger;Jerry L Hatfield;Kalia Ramalingam

  • On coherent structures in turbulence above and within agricultural plant canopies

    Kyaw Tha Paw U;Yves Brunet;Serge Collineau;Roger H. Shaw

  • Evapotranspiration estimates derived using thermal-based satellite remote sensing and data fusion for irrigation management in California vineyards

    Kyle R. Knipper;William P. Kustas;Martha C. Anderson;Joseph G. Alfieri

  • An Interdisciplinary Field Study of the Energy and Water Fluxes in the Atmosphere–Biosphere System over Semiarid Rangelands: Description and Some Preliminary Results

    W. P. Kustas;T. J. Jackson;T. J. Schmugge;R. Parry

  • Assessing the interception of photosynthetically active radiation in winter wheat

    Unknown

  • Surface energy balance estimates at local and regional scales using optical remote sensing from an aircraft platform and atmospheric data collected over semiarid rangelands

    William P. Kustas;M.S. Moran;K.S. Humes;D.I. Stannard

  • Comparing Aircraft-Based Remotely Sensed Energy Balance Fluxes with Eddy Covariance Tower Data Using Heat Flux Source Area Functions

    José L. Chávez;Christopher M. U. Neale;Lawrence E. Hipps;John H. Prueger

  • THE GRAPE REMOTE SENSING ATMOSPHERIC PROFILE AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION EXPERIMENT.

    William P. Kustas;Martha C. Anderson;Joseph G. Alfieri;Kyle Knipper

  • On the discrepancy between eddy covariance and lysimetry-based surface flux measurements under strongly advective conditions ☆

    Joseph G. Alfieri;William P. Kustas;John H. Prueger;Lawrence E. Hipps

  • Tower and Aircraft Eddy Covariance Measurements of Water Vapor, Energy, and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes during SMACEX

    J. H. Prueger;J. L. Hatfield;W. P. Kustas;L. E. Hipps

  • Comparison of Eddy Covariance, Chamber, and Gradient Methods of Measuring Soil CO2 Efflux in an Annual Semi-Arid Grass, Bromus tectorum

    M. C. Myklebust;L. E. Hipps;Ronald J. Ryel

  • The infrared emissivities of soil and Artemisia tridentata and subsequent temperature corrections in a shrub-steppe ecosystem☆

    Lawrence E. Hipps

  • Extreme Fire Season in California: A Glimpse Into the Future?

    Jin-Ho Yoon;Ben Kravitz;Philip J. Rasch;S.-Y. Simon Wang

  • Revisiting the paper “Using radiometric surface temperature for surface energy flux estimation in Mediterranean drylands from a two-source perspective”

    William P. Kustas;Hector Nieto;Laura Morillas;Martha C. Anderson

  • Coherence between the Great Salt Lake Level and the Pacific Quasi-Decadal Oscillation

    Shih-Yu Wang;Robert R. Gillies;Jiming Jin;Lawrence E. Hipps

  • Evaporation and the development of the local boundary layer over an irrigated surface in an arid region

    J.H. Prueger;L.E. Hipps;D.I. Cooper

  • Evaluating the two-source energy balance model using local thermal and surface flux observations in a strongly advective irrigated agricultural area

    William P. Kustas;Joseph G. Alfieri;Martha C. Anderson;Paul D. Colaizzi

  • Wind dispersal and subsequent establishment of VA mycorrhizal fungi across a successional arid landscape

    Michael F. Allen;Lawrence E. Hipps;Gene L. Wooldridge

  • The boardman regional flux experiment

    J. C. Doran;F. J. Barnes;R. L. Coulter;T. L. Crawford

Frequent Co-Authors

John H. Prueger
John H. Prueger Agricultural Research Service
William P. Kustas
William P. Kustas Agricultural Research Service
Joseph G. Alfieri
Joseph G. Alfieri Agricultural Research Service
Héctor Nieto
Héctor Nieto Spanish National Research Council
Christopher M. U. Neale
Christopher M. U. Neale University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Martha C. Anderson
Martha C. Anderson Agricultural Research Service
Shih-Yu Wang
Shih-Yu Wang Utah State University
Robert R. Gillies
Robert R. Gillies Utah State University
Andrew J. McElrone
Andrew J. McElrone United States Department of Agriculture
Jerry L. Hatfield
Jerry L. Hatfield Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs like the online dsw programs in social work equip graduates to address environmental justice issues by integrating social work principles with ecological awareness.

Those seeking a versatile foundation might consider the most affordable online general studies degree programs. These provide a broad knowledge base that can include environmental topics and prepare students for various interdisciplinary roles.

If flexibility and ease of completion are priorities, identifying the easiest degree to get related to natural sciences could help students balance studies with professional or personal commitments while still advancing their education.

For a more focused approach, the geology degrees online offer specialized knowledge that complements environmental science careers, especially in areas like resource management and environmental assessment.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence E. Hipps

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles