World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7520 7227 2669 2484 131 5282

Joseph G. Alfieri publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joseph G. Alfieri between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joseph G. Alfieri published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2020. 13 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2020. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
2004 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joseph G. Alfieri: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 6
2008 2
2009 3
2010 0
2011 2
2012 12
2013 4
2014 3
2015 4
2016 9
2017 10
2018 4
2019 16
2020 21
2021 10
2022 18
2023 11
2024 7
2025 6
Total 149
Download as CSV

Joseph G. Alfieri publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph G. Alfieri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 131 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 131
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Joseph G. Alfieri D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph G. Alfieri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Joseph G. Alfieri is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with specific attention to subfields such as global and planetary change, plant science, soil science, ecology, and environmental engineering.

The main topics of Alfieri's work include plant water relations and carbon dynamics, horticultural and viticultural research, irrigation practices and water management, remote sensing in agriculture, hydrology and watershed management studies, urban heat island mitigation, and solar radiation and photovoltaics.

Frequent coauthors contributing to Alfieri's publications include William P. Kustas, John H. Prueger, María Mar Alsina, L. McKee, and Lawrence E. Hipps.

Alfieri has published extensively in various academic venues. The major publication venues featuring their work are:

  • Irrigation Science
  • Remote Sensing
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • HydroShare Resources
  • Remote Sensing of Environment

Some of Alfieri's recent papers are:

  • Interoperability of ECOSTRESS and Landsat for mapping evapotranspiration time series at sub-field scales, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Data assimilation of high-resolution thermal and radar remote sensing retrievals for soil moisture monitoring in a drip-irrigated vineyard, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Using high-spatiotemporal thermal satellite ET retrievals to monitor water use over California vineyards of different climate, vine variety and trellis design, 2020, Agricultural Water Management
  • Direct partitioning of eddy-covariance water and carbon dioxide fluxes into ground and plant components, 2022, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Soil Moisture-Evapotranspiration Overcoupling and L-Band Brightness Temperature Assimilation: Sources and Forecast Implications, 2020, Journal of Hydrometeorology

Best Publications

  • Toward mapping crop progress at field scales through fusion of Landsat and MODIS imagery

    Feng Gao;Martha C. Anderson;Xiaoyang Zhang;Zhengwei Yang

  • Description and Evaluation of the Characteristics of the NCAR High-Resolution Land Data Assimilation System

    Fei Chen;Kevin W. Manning;Margaret A. LeMone;Stanley B. Trier

  • Monitoring daily evapotranspiration over two California vineyards using Landsat 8 in a multi-sensor data fusion approach

    Kathryn A. Semmens;Martha C. Anderson;William P. Kustas;Feng Gao

  • Daily Mapping of 30 m LAI and NDVI for Grape Yield Prediction in California Vineyards

    Liang Sun;Feng Gao;Martha C. Anderson;William P. Kustas

  • Mapping daily evapotranspiration at Landsat spatial scales during the BEAREX’08 field campaign

    Martha C. Anderson;William P. Kustas;Joseph G. Alfieri;Feng Gao

  • Evapotranspiration estimates derived using thermal-based satellite remote sensing and data fusion for irrigation management in California vineyards

    Kyle R. Knipper;William P. Kustas;Martha C. Anderson;Joseph G. Alfieri

  • Interoperability of ECOSTRESS and Landsat for mapping evapotranspiration time series at sub-field scales

    Martha C. Anderson;Yang Yang;Jie Xue;Kyle R. Knipper

  • Evaluation of TSEB turbulent fluxes using different methods for the retrieval of soil and canopy component temperatures from UAV thermal and multispectral imagery

    Héctor Nieto;William P. Kustas;Alfonso F. Torres-Rúa;Joseph G. Alfieri

  • THE GRAPE REMOTE SENSING ATMOSPHERIC PROFILE AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION EXPERIMENT.

    William P. Kustas;Martha C. Anderson;Joseph G. Alfieri;Kyle Knipper

  • Influence of Land Cover and Soil Moisture on the Horizontal Distribution of Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes in Southeast Kansas during IHOP_2002 and CASES-97

    Margaret A. LeMone;Fei Chen;Joseph G. Alfieri;Mukul Tewari

  • On the discrepancy between eddy covariance and lysimetry-based surface flux measurements under strongly advective conditions ☆

    Joseph G. Alfieri;William P. Kustas;John H. Prueger;Lawrence E. Hipps

  • Evaporative loss from irrigated interrows in a highly advective semi-arid agricultural area☆

    Nurit Agam;Steven R. Evett;Judy A. Tolk;William P. Kustas

  • Mapping evapotranspiration with high-resolution aircraft imagery over vineyards using one- and two-source modeling schemes

    Ting Xia;Ting Xia;William P. Kustas;Martha C. Anderson;Joseph G. Alfieri

  • Field-scale mapping of evaporative stress indicators of crop yield: An application over Mead, NE, USA

    Yang Yang;Martha C. Anderson;Feng Gao;Brian D. Wardlow

  • Evaluation of the Noah Land Surface Model Using Data from a Fair-Weather IHOP_2002 Day with Heterogeneous Surface Fluxes

    Margaret A. LeMone;Mukul Tewari;Fei Chen;Joseph G. Alfieri

  • Revisiting the paper “Using radiometric surface temperature for surface energy flux estimation in Mediterranean drylands from a two-source perspective”

    William P. Kustas;Hector Nieto;Laura Morillas;Martha C. Anderson

  • Evaluating the two-source energy balance model using local thermal and surface flux observations in a strongly advective irrigated agricultural area

    William P. Kustas;Joseph G. Alfieri;Martha C. Anderson;Paul D. Colaizzi

  • Soil water content estimation using a remote sensing based hybrid evapotranspiration modeling approach

    Christopher M.U. Neale;Hatim M.E. Geli;William P. Kustas;Joseph G. Alfieri

  • Estimation of the Minimum Canopy Resistance for Croplands and Grasslands Using Data from the 2002 International H2O Project

    Joseph G. Alfieri;Dev Niyogi;Peter D. Blanken;Fei Chen

  • Data Assimilation of High-Resolution Thermal and Radar Remote Sensing Retrievals for Soil Moisture Monitoring in a Drip-Irrigated Vineyard.

    Fangni Lei;Fangni Lei;Wade T. Crow;William P. Kustas;Jianzhi Dong

  • Utility of the two-source energy balance (TSEB) model in vine and interrow flux partitioning over the growing season

    W. P. Kustas;J. G. Alfieri;H. Nieto;T. G. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

William P. Kustas
William P. Kustas Agricultural Research Service
John H. Prueger
John H. Prueger Agricultural Research Service
Martha C. Anderson
Martha C. Anderson Agricultural Research Service
Lawrence E. Hipps
Lawrence E. Hipps Utah State University
Héctor Nieto
Héctor Nieto Spanish National Research Council
Christopher Hain
Christopher Hain Marshall Space Flight Center
Andrew J. McElrone
Andrew J. McElrone United States Department of Agriculture
Steven R. Evett
Steven R. Evett Agricultural Research Service
Dev Niyogi
Dev Niyogi The University of Texas at Austin
Terry A. Howell
Terry A. Howell Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students start with an online general studies bachelor degree cheap as a flexible and budget-friendly option. This allows for a broad foundation before specializing in environmental topics or related fields.

Another popular route is the best online geology degree, which closely aligns with core environmental science disciplines. It equips students with vital knowledge in earth processes, essential for careers in sustainability, conservation, or resource management.

For those looking to advance further, especially in leadership or clinical roles, exploring fully funded dsw programs can be valuable. These programs combine social work expertise with environmental justice aspects, broadening career impact.

Lastly, individuals seeking an easier pathway to enhance qualifications may consider the easiest bachelor's degree options online. While these may not be direct environmental science degrees, they can provide complementary skills for diverse roles in environmental sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph G. Alfieri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles