World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
14010
World Ranking
3618
National Ranking
1736

Charles E. Thorpe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Thorpe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 163 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Charles E. Thorpe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Thorpe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For contributions to outdoor autonomous robots, including development of the highly successful Navlab vehicles.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision
  • Algorithm

Charles E. Thorpe focuses on Mobile robot, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Robot and Human–computer interaction. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Control engineering, Embedded system and Motion planning. Charles E. Thorpe performs integrative Artificial intelligence and Obstacle research in his work.

His Computer vision research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Probabilistic logic and Robotics. His study in Simulation extends to Robot with its themes. Charles E. Thorpe usually deals with Human–computer interaction and limits it to topics linked to Teleoperation and Human–robot interaction.

His most cited work include:

  • Vision and navigation for the Carnegie-Mellon Navlab (728 citations)
  • Simultaneous Localization, Mapping and Moving Object Tracking (478 citations)
  • Stereo- and neural network-based pedestrian detection (347 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Mobile robot, Robot and Human–computer interaction are his primary areas of study. Charles E. Thorpe incorporates Artificial intelligence and Obstacle in his research. His Object detection, Tracking and Image processing study, which is part of a larger body of work in Computer vision, is frequently linked to Geography, bridging the gap between disciplines.

The Mobile robot study combines topics in areas such as Control engineering, Teleoperation and Motion planning. The Teleoperation study which covers Embedded system that intersects with Sensor fusion. His study looks at the relationship between Robot and fields such as Simulation, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (50.60%)
  • Computer vision (39.29%)
  • Mobile robot (36.90%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1998-2013)?

  • Artificial intelligence (50.60%)
  • Computer vision (39.29%)
  • Mobile robot (36.90%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Charles E. Thorpe spends much of his time researching Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Mobile robot, Robot and Teleoperation. Charles E. Thorpe integrates Artificial intelligence and Obstacle in his studies. In general Computer vision study, his work on Object detection and Tracking often relates to the realm of Geography, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

His Mobile robot research integrates issues from Value, Image sensor, Human–robot interaction and Human–computer interaction. His study in the field of Robot control is also linked to topics like Operating environment. His Teleoperation research incorporates elements of Control engineering, Simulation, Embedded system and Sensor fusion.

Between 1998 and 2013, his most popular works were:

  • Simultaneous Localization, Mapping and Moving Object Tracking (478 citations)
  • Stereo- and neural network-based pedestrian detection (347 citations)
  • Vehicle Teleoperation Interfaces (342 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision
  • Algorithm

His main research concerns Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Mobile robot, Robot and Teleoperation. His work deals with themes such as Pedestrian detection and Algorithm, which intersect with Artificial intelligence. The various areas that he examines in his Computer vision study include Artificial neural network and Probabilistic logic.

His research brings together the fields of Real-time computing and Mobile robot. The concepts of his Teleoperation study are interwoven with issues in Human–robot interaction, Human–computer interaction, Control engineering and Robot control, Social robot. As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Object detection, focusing on Tracking and, on occasion, Simultaneous localization and mapping, Robotics, Structure and Motion modeling.

Best Publications

  • Vision and navigation for the Carnegie-Mellon Navlab

    C. Thorpe;M.H. Hebert;T. Kanade;S.A. Shafer

  • Simultaneous Localization, Mapping and Moving Object Tracking

    Chieh-Chih Wang;Charles Thorpe;Sebastian Thrun;Martial Hebert

  • Stereo- and neural network-based pedestrian detection

    L. Zhao;C.E. Thorpe

  • Vehicle Teleoperation Interfaces

    Terrence Fong;Charles Thorpe

  • Online simultaneous localization and mapping with detection and tracking of moving objects: theory and results from a ground vehicle in crowded urban areas

    Chieh-Chih Wang;C. Thorpe;S. Thrun

  • Structure from motion without correspondence

    F. Dellaert;S.M. Seitz;C.E. Thorpe;S. Thrun

  • Collaboration, Dialogue, Human-Robot Interaction

    Terrence Fong;Terrence Fong;Charles E. Thorpe;Charles Baur

  • Integrated path planning and dynamic steering control for autonomous vehicles

    B. Krogh;C. Thorpe

  • Simultaneous localization and mapping with detection and tracking of moving objects

    Chieh-Chih Wang;C. Thorpe

  • Integrated mobile robot control

    Omead Amidi;Chuck E. Thorpe

  • SCARF: a color vision system that tracks roads and intersections

    J.D. Crisman;C.E. Thorpe

  • First results in robot road-following

    Richard Wallace;Anthony Stentz;Charles Thorpe;Hans Maravec

  • Multi-robot remote driving with collaborative control

    T. Fong;C. Thorpe;C. Baur

  • Collaborative control: a robot-centric model for vehicle teleoperation

    Terrence W. Fong;Charles Thorpe

  • An architecture for sensor fusion in a mobile robot

    S. Shafer;A. Stentz;C. Thorpe

  • Path Relaxation: Path Planning for a Mobile Robot

    C. Thorpe;L. Matthies

  • Dressed human modeling, detection, and parts localization

    Charles E. Thorpe;Liang Zhao

  • UNSCARF-a color vision system for the detection of unstructured roads

    J.D. Crisman;C.E. Thorpe

  • Advanced Interfaces for Vehicle Teleoperation: Collaborative Control, Sensor Fusion Displays, and Remote Driving Tools

    Terrence Fong;Charles Thorpe;Charles Baur

  • Robot, asker of questions

    Terrence Fong;Terrence Fong;Charles E. Thorpe;Charles Baur

Frequent Co-Authors

Takeo Kanade
Takeo Kanade Carnegie Mellon University
Terrence Fong
Terrence Fong Ames Research Center
Martial Hebert
Martial Hebert Carnegie Mellon University
Frank Dellaert
Frank Dellaert Georgia Institute of Technology
Rahul Sukthankar
Rahul Sukthankar Google (United States)
Sebastian Thrun
Sebastian Thrun Stanford University
Anthony Stentz
Anthony Stentz Carnegie Mellon University
David Wettergreen
David Wettergreen Carnegie Mellon University
Larry Matthies
Larry Matthies Jet Propulsion Lab

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to diverse tech-driven fields. Many students also consider related online degrees that can strengthen career prospects and broaden job opportunities across multiple industries.

If you have an interest in law and public service, a look into cheapest online criminal justice degrees may reveal highly affordable pathways for exploring legal technology and cybersecurity roles. Those with a passion for business and data analysis may benefit from enrolling in a cheap online accounting degree to build financial, auditing, and managerial expertise.

For tech professionals seeking advanced credentials, the best masters in data science online programs can empower students with skills in AI, big data, and machine learning—perfect for a rapidly evolving tech landscape. Alternatively, if you’re interested in managing technology-forward projects, an accelerated construction management degree online can take your leadership potential further in smart infrastructure and project delivery.

Each of these program choices can complement a background in Computer Science, creating strong foundations for specialized, high-demand careers.

Best Scientists Citing Charles E. Thorpe

Recently Published Articles