World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
9979
World Ranking
12377
National Ranking
5016

Terrence Fong publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terrence Fong sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Terrence Fong D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terrence Fong sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Terrence Fong is affiliated with the Ames Research Center in the United States. Their research encompasses multiple fields, with a focus on engineering, computer science, and psychology, supported by publications spanning those domains.

Their work involves subfields such as social psychology, artificial intelligence, control and systems engineering, human-computer interaction, and aerospace engineering.

Main topics in Terrence Fong's research include:

  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Space Exploration and Technology
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • AI in Service Interactions

Frequent publication venues where Terrence Fong has contributed include:

  • Current Robotics Reports
  • 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Modern Health Science

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Terrence Fong are:

  • Kimberly Hambuchen
  • Jessica J. Márquez
  • Samantha Reig
  • Elizabeth Carter
  • Aaron Steinfeld

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Terrence Fong include:

  • A Review of NASA Human-Robot Interaction in Space, 2021, Current Robotics Reports
  • Perceptions of Explicitly vs. Implicitly Relayed Commands Between a Robot and Smart Speaker, 2022, 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • Efficient Dynamics Estimation With Adaptive Model Sets, 2021, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Affordance Template Registration via Human-in-the-loop Corrections, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • An AI Fusion Model Based on Molecular Docking and Large Language Models-- Used to Predict the Interaction Between Traditional Chinese Medicine and Disease, 2025, Modern Health Science

Best Publications

  • A survey of socially interactive robots

    Terrence Fong;Terrence Fong;Illah R. Nourbakhsh;Kerstin Dautenhahn

  • Common metrics for human-robot interaction

    Aaron Steinfeld;Terrence Fong;David Kaber;Michael Lewis

  • Vehicle Teleoperation Interfaces

    Terrence Fong;Charles Thorpe

  • Collaboration, Dialogue, Human-Robot Interaction

    Terrence Fong;Terrence Fong;Charles E. Thorpe;Charles Baur

  • Multi-robot remote driving with collaborative control

    T. Fong;C. Thorpe;C. Baur

  • A Survey of Methods for Safe Human-Robot Interaction

    Przemyslaw A. Lasota;Terrence Fong;Julie A. Shah

  • Collaborative control: a robot-centric model for vehicle teleoperation

    Terrence W. Fong;Charles Thorpe

  • A non-contact mouse for surgeon-computer interaction

    C. Grätzel;T. Fong;S. Grange;C. Baur

  • Advanced Interfaces for Vehicle Teleoperation: Collaborative Control, Sensor Fusion Displays, and Remote Driving Tools

    Terrence Fong;Charles Thorpe;Charles Baur

  • Communicating Directionality in Flying Robots

    Daniel Szafir;Bilge Mutlu;Terrence Fong

  • Robot, asker of questions

    Terrence Fong;Terrence Fong;Charles E. Thorpe;Charles Baur

  • Novel Interfaces for Remote Driving: Gesture, Haptic and PDA

    Terrence W. Fong;Francois Conti;Sebastien Grange;Charles Baur

  • Communication of intent in assistive free flyers

    Daniel Szafir;Bilge Mutlu;Terrence Fong

  • Vehicle detection from aerial imagery

    Joshua Gleason;Ara V. Nefian;Xavier Bouyssounousse;Terry Fong

  • The human-robot interaction operating system

    Terrence Fong;Clayton Kunz;Laura M. Hiatt;Magda Bugajska

  • Interaction challenges in human-robot space exploration

    Terrence Fong;Illah Nourbakhsh

  • The Peer-to-Peer Human-Robot Interaction Project

    Terrence Fong;Illah Nourbakhsh;Clayton Kunz;John Schreiner

  • A Survey of Nonverbal Signaling Methods for Non-Humanoid Robots

    Elizabeth Cha;Yunkyung Kim;Terrence Fong;Maja J. Mataric

  • Astrobee: Developing a Free Flying Robot for the International Space Station

    Maria Bualat;Jonathan Barlow;Terrence Fong;Chris Provencher

  • Robot as Partner: Vehicle Teleoperation with Collaborative Control

    Terrence Fong;Charles Thorpe;Charles Baur

  • Effective vehicle teleoperation on the World Wide Web

    S. Grange;T. Fong;C. Baur

  • PdaDriver: A Handheld System for Remote Driving

    T. Fong;C. Thorpe;B. Glass

  • Common metrics for human-robot interaction

    T. Fong;D. Kaber;M. Lewis;J. Scholtz

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles E. Thorpe
Charles E. Thorpe Carnegie Mellon University
Kip V. Hodges
Kip V. Hodges Arizona State University
Aaron Steinfeld
Aaron Steinfeld Carnegie Mellon University
Maja J. Matarić
Maja J. Matarić University of Southern California
Illah Nourbakhsh
Illah Nourbakhsh Carnegie Mellon University
Jean Scholtz
Jean Scholtz Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Alan C. Schultz
Alan C. Schultz United States Naval Research Laboratory
David Wettergreen
David Wettergreen Carnegie Mellon University
David B. Kaber
David B. Kaber University of Florida
Bilge Mutlu
Bilge Mutlu University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science isn't limited to traditional study paths. There are many related online degrees and specialized programs designed for different career goals. For those looking to fast-track their education, a computer science accelerated program offers intensive coursework and a quicker route to graduation, making it ideal for career changers or motivated students.

Computer science also opens opportunities in related STEM fields. Students interested in the intersection between technology and the environment may consider an environmental engineering degree to develop skills in sustainable systems and solutions. Engineering fundamentals can further be explored with an online degree in mechanical engineering, which emphasizes critical thinking and technical innovation.

For those curious about the fundamentals of the universe and technical problem solving, pursuing the best online physics degree can be a strong foundation for a wide range of tech and research roles. Each of these degrees provides unique career pathways and skillsets, helping learners match their studies to their professional ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Terrence Fong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles