World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
New Zealand
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 51 5248 5101 12 10 230 13885

Christoph Bartneck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christoph Bartneck between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christoph Bartneck published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2021. 11 of the 281 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2021. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
1998 2025

281 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christoph Bartneck: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 0
2000 0
2001 7
2002 4
2003 5
2004 7
2005 8
2006 9
2007 17
2008 16
2009 21
2010 15
2011 10
2012 5
2013 12
2014 8
2015 9
2016 13
2017 11
2018 9
2019 23
2020 17
2021 35
2022 3
2023 4
2024 6
2025 5
Total 281
Download as CSV

Christoph Bartneck publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christoph Bartneck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 222–231 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 230 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437 230
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Christoph Bartneck D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christoph Bartneck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543 51
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in New Zealand Leader Award

Overview

Christoph Bartneck is affiliated with the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. Their research spans multiple fields, with significant contributions to psychology, social sciences, and neuroscience. Within these main fields, their work notably includes social psychology, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, and artificial intelligence.

The primary topics of their research involve social robot interaction and human-robot interaction (HRI), the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, ethics and social impacts of artificial intelligence, AI in service interactions, death anxiety and social exclusion, language, metaphor and cognition, and action observation and synchronization.

Bartneck has been a frequent contributor to several publication venues. These include:

  • International Journal of Social Robotics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Human-Robot Interaction
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics

Their recent papers include:

  • "The morality of abusing a robot" (2020), published in Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics
  • "Robot Likeability and Reciprocity in Human Robot Interaction: Using Ultimatum Game to determinate Reciprocal Likeable Robot Strategies" (2020), International Journal of Social Robotics
  • "The Doors of Social Robot Perception: The Influence of Implicit Self-theories" (2021), International Journal of Social Robotics
  • "Detecting the corruption of online questionnaires by artificial intelligence" (2024), Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • "What's to bullying a bot?" (2021), Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems

Bartneck has several frequent co-authors, indicating collaborative work with researchers including Friederike Eyssel, Merel Keijsers, Tony Belpaeme, Takayuki Kanda, and Selma Šabanović.

In addition to articles, Bartneck has contributed to academic books published by notable presses. These include:

  • Two editions of "Human-Robot Interaction" (2020 and 2024) published by Cambridge University Press
  • "An Introduction to Ethics in Robotics and AI" (2020) published by Springer International Publishing
  • "Robots in Education: An Introduction to High-Tech Social Agents, Intelligent Tutors, and Curricular Tools" (2021) published by Ghent University

Best Publications

  • Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots

    Christoph Bartneck;Dana Kulic;Elizabeth A. Croft;Susana Zoghbi

  • A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction

    C. Bartneck;J. Forlizzi

  • Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and Challenges in Human-Robot Interaction

    Jakub Złotowski;Diane Proudfoot;Kumar Yogeeswaran;Christoph Bartneck

  • Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor

    Martin Saerbeck;Tom Schut;Christoph Bartneck;Maddy D. Janse

  • Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources

    Jakub Złotowski;Kumar Yogeeswaran;Christoph Bartneck

  • Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment.

    Christoph Bartneck;Andreas Duenser;Elena Moltchanova;Karolina Zawieska

  • Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis

    Christoph Bartneck;Servaas Kokkelmans

  • Is The Uncanny Valley An Uncanny Cliff

    C. Bartneck;T. Kanda;H. Ishiguro;N. Hagita

  • Integrating the OCC model of emotions in embodied characters

    Christoph Bartneck

  • Does the Design of a Robot Influence Its Animacy and Perceived Intelligence

    Christoph Bartneck;Takayuki Kanda;Omar Mubin;Abdullah Al Mahmud

  • My robotic doppelgänger - a critical look at the Uncanny Valley

    Christoph Bartneck;Takayuki Kanda;Hiroshi Ishiguro;Norihiro Hagita

  • Perception of affect elicited by robot motion

    Martin Saerbeck;Christoph Bartneck

  • An Introduction to Ethics in Robotics and AI

    Christoph Bartneck;Christoph Lütge;Alan Wagner;Sean Welsh

  • Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots

    Christoph Bartneck;Dana Kulic;Elizabeth Croft

  • Interacting with an embodied emotional character

    Christoph Bartneck

  • Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed Questionnaire Series

    Astrid Weiss;Christoph Bartneck

  • Reciprocity in Human-Robot Interaction: A Quantitative Approach Through the Prisoner’s Dilemma and the Ultimatum Game

    Eduardo Benítez Sandoval;Jürgen Brandstetter;Mohammad Obaid;Christoph Bartneck

  • The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research

    Kumar Yogeeswaran;Jakub Złotowski;Megan Livingstone;Christoph Bartneck

  • "Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do!": switching off a robot

    Christoph Bartneck;Michel van der Hoek;Omar Mubin;Abdullah Al Mahmud

  • To kill a mockingbird robot

    Christoph Bartneck;Marcel Verbunt;Omar Mubin;Abdullah Al Mahmud

  • Human-Robot Interaction: An Introduction

    Christoph Bartneck;Tony Belpaeme;Friederike Eyssel;Takayuki Kanda

  • How Convincing is Mr. Data's Smile: Affective Expressions of Machines

    Christoph Bartneck

Frequent Co-Authors

Takayuki Kanda
Takayuki Kanda Kyoto University
Hiroshi Ishiguro
Hiroshi Ishiguro Osaka University
Mark Billinghurst
Mark Billinghurst University of South Australia
Matthias Rauterberg
Matthias Rauterberg Eindhoven University of Technology
Tony Belpaeme
Tony Belpaeme Ghent University
Tim B. F. Woodfield
Tim B. F. Woodfield University of Otago
Kumar Yogeeswaran
Kumar Yogeeswaran University of Canterbury
Gun A. Lee
Gun A. Lee University of South Australia
Norihiro Hagita
Norihiro Hagita Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International
John C. Dalrymple-Alford
John C. Dalrymple-Alford University of Canterbury

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science education in the USA opens up numerous flexible and affordable online degree options. For those looking to fast-track their careers, there are quick masters degrees online that allow you to earn your credentials in as little as 12 months. These accelerated programs are ideal if you want to upskill rapidly and enter the workforce sooner.

If job security and market demand are your priorities, consider enrolling in one of the most in demand masters degrees. Specializations like artificial intelligence, data science, and cybersecurity not only enhance your technical expertise but also boost your employability across industries.

For students just starting their academic journey, associates degrees online offer a budget-friendly path to develop foundational skills. These programs provide a stepping stone to bachelor’s or master’s study, or directly to entry-level tech roles.

Affordability is a crucial factor for many learners. Fortunately, there is a growing number of cheap online colleges that provide high-quality computer science education without breaking the bank. These institutions make it easier to pursue your dream tech career while managing costs.

Best Scientists Citing Christoph Bartneck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles