World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Manfred Tscheligi

Manfred Tscheligi

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
12801
World Ranking
4532
National Ranking
29

Manfred Tscheligi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manfred Tscheligi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 670 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Manfred Tscheligi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manfred Tscheligi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Manfred Tscheligi is affiliated with the University of Salzburg in Austria and has an extensive publication record spanning multiple fields, predominantly in psychology, computer science, and engineering. Their research integrates perspectives from social psychology, human-computer interaction, and industrial and manufacturing engineering, with additional work in developmental and educational psychology as well as applied psychology.

Their work focuses on topics including human-automation interaction and safety, virtual and augmented reality applications, digital transformation in industry, surgical simulation and training, behavioral health and interventions, and simulation-based education in healthcare.

Recent publications by Manfred Tscheligi include:

  • Work gamification: Effects on enjoyment, productivity and the role of leadership (2020), Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
  • Enhancing Operational Police Training in High Stress Situations with Virtual Reality: Experiences, Tools and Guidelines (2023), Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
  • User-centred design and evaluation of a tele-operated echocardiography robot (2020), Health and Technology
  • Everyday automation experience: a research agenda (2020), Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
  • Toward human-centered intelligent assistance system in manufacturing: challenges and potentials for operator 5.0 (2024), Procedia Computer Science

Manfred Tscheligi has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, most notably Helmut Schrom-Feiertag and Peter Fröhlich, each with 11 collaborative works, Olivia Zechner and Jakob Carl Uhl with 8 collaborations each, and Alexander G. Mirnig with 7.

Their research findings have been disseminated in multiple publication venues with repeated appearances in Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Metrology for Extended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE).

Best Publications

  • Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience

    Christina Rödel;Susanne Stadler;Alexander Meschtscherjakov;Manfred Tscheligi

  • Paper prototyping - what is it good for?: a comparison of paper- and computer-based low-fidelity prototyping

    Reinhard Sefelin;Manfred Tscheligi;Verena Giller

  • Being there again Presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability and user experience using a mobile navigation task

    Jennifer Brade;Mario Lorenz;Marc Busch;Niels Hammer

  • Predicting information technology usage in the car: towards a car technology acceptance model

    Sebastian Osswald;Daniela Wurhofer;Sandra Trösterer;Elke Beck

  • Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Elizabeth Dykstra-Erickson;Manfred Tscheligi

  • To Err Is Robot: How Humans Assess and Act toward an Erroneous Social Robot

    Nicole Mirnig;Gerald Stollnberger;Markus Miksch;Susanne Stadler

  • Joking, storytelling, artsharing, expressing affection: a field trial of how children and their social network communicate with digital images in leisure time

    Ann Mäkelä;Verena Giller;Manfred Tscheligi;Reinhard Sefelin

  • Acceptance of future persuasive in-car interfaces towards a more economic driving behaviour

    Alexander Meschtscherjakov;David Wilfinger;Thomas Scherndl;Manfred Tscheligi

  • Toward an Information Society for All: HCI Challenges and R&D Recommendations

    Constantine Stephanidis;Gavriel Salvendy;Demosthenes Akoumianakis;Albert Arnold

  • The USUS Evaluation Framework for Human-Robot Interaction

    Astrid Weiss;Regina Bernhaupt;Michael Lankes;Manfred Tscheligi

  • Interactive TV for the Home: An Ethnographic Study on Users' Requirements and Experiences

    Marianna Obrist;Regina Bernhaupt;Manfred Tscheligi

  • Persuasive Technology

    Unknown

  • Semantically structured tag clouds: an empirical evaluation of clustered presentation approaches

    Johann Schrammel;Michael Leitner;Manfred Tscheligi

  • Trends in the living room and beyond: results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing

    Regina Bernhaupt;Marianna Obrist;Astrid Weiss;Elke Beck

  • Personality traits, usage patterns and information disclosure in online communities

    Johann Schrammel;Christina Köffel;Manfred Tscheligi

  • “I Love This Dog”—Children’s Emotional Attachment to the Robotic Dog AIBO

    Astrid Weiss;Daniela Wurhofer;Manfred Tscheligi

  • A methodological variation for acceptance evaluation of Human-Robot Interaction in public places

    A. Weiss;R. Bernhaupt;M. Tscheligi;D. Wollherr

  • Using Heuristics to Evaluate the Overall User Experience of Video Games and Advanced Interaction Games

    Christina Koeffel;Wolfgang Hochleitner;Jakob Leitner;Michael Haller

  • Evaluating user experiences in games

    Regina Bernhaupt;Wijand Ijsselsteijn;Florian 'Floyd' Mueller;Manfred Tscheligi

  • Robots asking for directions: the willingness of passers-by to support robots

    Astrid Weiss;Judith Igelsbock;Manfred Tscheligi;Andrea Bauer

  • How much do you tell?: information disclosure behaviour indifferent types of online communities

    Johann Schrammel;Christina Köffel;Manfred Tscheligi

  • Methods for evaluating games: how to measure usability and user experience in games?

    Regina Bernhaupt;Manfred Eckschlager;Manfred Tscheligi

  • Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

    Bilge Mutlu;Manfred Tscheligi;Astrid Weiss;James E. Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Marianna Obrist
Marianna Obrist University College London
Philippe Palanque
Philippe Palanque Paul Sabatier University
Martin Buss
Martin Buss Technical University of Munich
Thomas Engel
Thomas Engel University of Luxembourg
Panos Markopoulos
Panos Markopoulos Eindhoven University of Technology
Andreas Uhl
Andreas Uhl University of Salzburg
Fabio Paternò
Fabio Paternò National Research Council (CNR)
Bilge Mutlu
Bilge Mutlu University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael Muller
Michael Muller IBM (United States)
Volker Wulf
Volker Wulf University of Siegen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of specialized online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students value flexibility and affordability—qualities you’ll find at the most respected online university programs. These institutions offer accredited, high-quality courses suitable for working professionals and remote learners.

The tech industry is vast, with exciting areas like gaming and security. If you’re interested in designing innovative games, consider a game design online masters. This path combines technology, creativity, and storytelling. Alternatively, digital safety is in high demand. An online cyber security degree can lead to roles protecting organizations from digital threats.

Beyond traditional tech roles, computer science skills are valuable in fields like project management and industry oversight. For example, an online construction management degree equips graduates to lead tech-driven construction projects and infrastructure development.

No matter your interest, online degrees can help you tailor your computer science education to meet your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Manfred Tscheligi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles