World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3041 2798 1729 1555 122 35835

Phoebe C. Ellsworth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Phoebe C. Ellsworth between 1967 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Phoebe C. Ellsworth published across 58 years, from 1967 to 2024, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2012. 1 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2012. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 5 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 6 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 5 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1967 2024

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Phoebe C. Ellsworth: publications per year, 1967 to 2024
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 1
1969 1
1970 0
1971 1
1972 5
1973 1
1974 2
1975 3
1976 1
1977 1
1978 3
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 6
1985 1
1986 0
1987 2
1988 3
1989 3
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 5
1995 2
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 3
2000 4
2001 4
2002 1
2003 6
2004 2
2005 0
2006 3
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 4
2011 6
2012 7
2013 6
2014 3
2015 6
2016 5
2017 1
2018 5
2019 2
2020 2
2021 3
2022 3
2023 0
2024 1
Total 138
Download as CSV

Phoebe C. Ellsworth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phoebe C. Ellsworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 122
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Phoebe C. Ellsworth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phoebe C. Ellsworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science
  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1978 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Phoebe C. Ellsworth is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences, focusing notably on psychology, social psychology, sociology, political science, law, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist has contributed to key topics including emotions and moral behavior, cultural differences and values, social and intergroup psychology, legal education and practice innovations, jury decision-making processes, child and animal learning development, and face recognition and perception.

Frequent co-authors in their work include Daniel Dukes, Kathryn Abrams, Ralph Adolphs, Kent Berridge, and Susan Broomhall.

Publication venues where their work appears regularly include:

  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Japanese Psychological Research
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)

Notable recent papers by Phoebe C. Ellsworth are:

  • "The rise of affectivism" (2021), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration" (2022), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Sharing and Non-sharing Happiness: Evidence from Cross-Cultural Studies in the United States and Japan" (2021), published in Japanese Psychological Research
  • "Truth and Advocacy: Reducing Bias in Policy-Related Research" (2021), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Jury Reform at the End of the Century: Real Agreement, Real Changes" (2025), published in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Awards received by Phoebe C. Ellsworth include the James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 2016, Fellowship of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1992, and Fellowship of the American Psychological Association since 1978.

Best Publications

  • Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings

    Paul Ekman;Wallace V. Friesen;Phoebe Ellsworth

  • Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion

    Craig A. Smith;Phoebe C. Ellsworth

  • Appraisal processes in emotion.

    Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Klaus R. Scherer

  • Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development

    Agnes Moors;Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Klaus R. Scherer;Nico H. Frijda

  • The world of emotions is not two-dimensional.

    Johnny R.J. Fontaine;Klaus R. Scherer;Etienne B. Roesch;Phoebe C. Ellsworth

  • Beyond simple pessimism: effects of sadness and anger on social perception.

    Dacher Keltner;Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Kari Edwards

  • From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings.

    Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Craig A. Smith

  • Placing the face in context: cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion.

    Takahiko Masuda;Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Batja Mesquita;Janxin Leu

  • Shades of Joy: Patterns of Appraisal Differentiating Pleasant Emotions

    Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Craig A. Smith

  • Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam.

    Craig A. Smith;Phoebe C. Ellsworth

  • Evolution, emotions, and emotional disorders.

    Randolph M. Nesse;Phoebe C. Ellsworth

  • Sentimental Stereotypes: Emotional Expectations for High-and Low-Status Group Members:

    Larissa Z. Tiedens;Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Batja Mesquita

  • Hardening of the Attitudes: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty

    Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Samuel R. Gross

  • White Juror Bias: An Investigation of Prejudice Against Black Defendants in the American Courtroom

    Samuel R. Sommers;Phoebe C. Ellsworth

  • Race in the Courtroom: Perceptions of Guilt and Dispositional Attributions

    Samuel R. Sommers;Phoebe C. Ellsworth

  • Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities.

    Sandra L. Murray;John G. Holmes;Geoff MacDonald;Phoebe C. Ellsworth

  • The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation

    Claudia L. Cowan;William C. Thompson;Phoebe C. Ellsworth

  • The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts.

    Saul M. Kassin;Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Vicki L. Smith

  • Are Manipulation Checks Necessary

    David J. Hauser;Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Richard Gonzalez

  • Public Opinion and Capital Punishment: A Close Examination of the Views of Abolitionists and Retentionists:

    Phoebe C. Ellsworth;Lee Ross

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Gonzalez
Richard Gonzalez University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Samuel R. Sommers
Samuel R. Sommers Tufts University
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Craig A. Smith
Craig A. Smith Vanderbilt University
Klaus R. Scherer
Klaus R. Scherer University of Geneva
Samuel R. Gross
Samuel R. Gross University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Wallace V. Friesen
Wallace V. Friesen University of California, San Francisco
Igor Grossmann
Igor Grossmann University of Waterloo
Sandra L. Murray
Sandra L. Murray University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is a versatile field that connects closely with several related areas, especially social work. Students interested in making a difference through direct support and advocacy may consider online social work degrees, which open doors to diverse career opportunities in counseling, healthcare, education, and community leadership.

Many top social work programs in Houston are designed to equip graduates with the practical skills necessary for addressing real-world mental health and social issues. If you are in the Northwest, the best social work degree programs in Idaho offer flexible learning options and a curriculum rooted in community engagement.

For those living in the South, both the best social work programs in Jackson and the top social work degrees in Louisiana provide pathways for earning accredited credentials. These programs often include online courses and field placements, making them ideal for working professionals or students balancing multiple responsibilities.

Combining psychology and social work studies can significantly expand your professional potential, preparing you for roles in therapy, case management, social service administration, and more. Explore these related online degrees to discover pathways that match your passion and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Phoebe C. Ellsworth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles